P798 Understanding anti-TNF treatment failure: mechanisms and management of loss of response to anti-TNF therapy, three-year data from the PANTS study

N. Chanchlani, S. Lin, B. Hamilton, C. Bewshea, A. Thomas, R. Smith, C. Roberts, R. Nice, T. Mcdonald, J. Goodhand, T. Ahmad, N. Kennedy
{"title":"P798 Understanding anti-TNF treatment failure: mechanisms and management of loss of response to anti-TNF therapy, three-year data from the PANTS study","authors":"N. Chanchlani, S. Lin, B. Hamilton, C. Bewshea, A. Thomas, R. Smith, C. Roberts, R. Nice, T. Mcdonald, J. Goodhand, T. Ahmad, N. Kennedy","doi":"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac190.0928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n PANTS (Personalised Anti-TNF Therapy in Crohn’s disease) is a prospective observational UK-wide study investigating the effectiveness of infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADL) in active luminal Crohn’s disease. Here we report remission rates through three years of follow up; rates of and the factors that predicted loss of response (LOR); and the effect of dose intensification on drug persistence.\n \n \n \n Remission was defined as CRP of ≤3 mg/L and HBI of ≤4 points (sPCDAI ≤15 in children), without corticosteroid therapy or exit for treatment failure.\n LOR was defined in patients who initially responded to anti-TNF therapy at week 14 and continued in the PANTS extension, by symptomatic IBD activity that warranted an escalation of corticosteroids, immunomodulatory or anti-TNF therapy, resectional surgery, or exit due to adverse events.\n The effect of dose intensification at the time of LOR on drug persistence was stratified by optimal anti-TNF drug level (IFX 7, ADL 12) (mg/L) and presence of antibodies (anti-IFX 9, anti-ADL 6) (AU/mL), measured using IDKmonitor® ELISA assays.\n \n \n \n Between March 2013 and July 2016, 1610 patients were included in PANTS: 358/955 (37%) treated with IFX (221/358 [62%] originator and 137/358 [38%] with biosimilar) and 187/655 (29%) treated with ADL, who had not exited for treatment failure at the end of year 1, opted to enrol in the extension.\n Overall, 41.8%, 39.4%, and 41.3% of IFX- and 38.2%, 39.7%, and 39.2% of ADL-treated patients were in remission at year 1, 2 and 3, respectively. For both drugs, we observed a dose response association between week 14 drug concentration and remission status at the later timepoints (A).\n 34.3%, 54.0%, and 60.3% of IFX-, and 31.9%, 47.3%, and 69.0% of ADL-treated patients lost response at year 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Multivariable regression analyses showed that low drug concentration was the major independent risk factor associated with LOR for both drugs (B).\n In patients who developed immunogenicity, factors associated with subsequent drug clearance were lower week 14 drug level (p<0.01), non-immunomodulator use (p=0.04), and obesity (p<0.01), but not carriage of HLA-DQA1*05 (p<0.34).\n In the setting of LOR (n = 686 episodes), 42% patients had their anti-TNF dose intensified and 29% exited the study without further action (C). Compared to patients who experienced LOR with optimal drug levels, dose intensification was associated with lower rates of drug persistence in patients with immunogenic-pharmacokinetic and non-immunogenic pharmacokinetic treatment failure in patients treated with IFX, but not ADL (D).\n \n \n \n Long term remission was observed in about 40% of patients treated with IFX and ADL. Loss of response and non-remission was predicted by low drug levels.\n \n \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":15453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crohn's and Colitis","volume":"95 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crohn's and Colitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac190.0928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PANTS (Personalised Anti-TNF Therapy in Crohn’s disease) is a prospective observational UK-wide study investigating the effectiveness of infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADL) in active luminal Crohn’s disease. Here we report remission rates through three years of follow up; rates of and the factors that predicted loss of response (LOR); and the effect of dose intensification on drug persistence. Remission was defined as CRP of ≤3 mg/L and HBI of ≤4 points (sPCDAI ≤15 in children), without corticosteroid therapy or exit for treatment failure. LOR was defined in patients who initially responded to anti-TNF therapy at week 14 and continued in the PANTS extension, by symptomatic IBD activity that warranted an escalation of corticosteroids, immunomodulatory or anti-TNF therapy, resectional surgery, or exit due to adverse events. The effect of dose intensification at the time of LOR on drug persistence was stratified by optimal anti-TNF drug level (IFX 7, ADL 12) (mg/L) and presence of antibodies (anti-IFX 9, anti-ADL 6) (AU/mL), measured using IDKmonitor® ELISA assays. Between March 2013 and July 2016, 1610 patients were included in PANTS: 358/955 (37%) treated with IFX (221/358 [62%] originator and 137/358 [38%] with biosimilar) and 187/655 (29%) treated with ADL, who had not exited for treatment failure at the end of year 1, opted to enrol in the extension. Overall, 41.8%, 39.4%, and 41.3% of IFX- and 38.2%, 39.7%, and 39.2% of ADL-treated patients were in remission at year 1, 2 and 3, respectively. For both drugs, we observed a dose response association between week 14 drug concentration and remission status at the later timepoints (A). 34.3%, 54.0%, and 60.3% of IFX-, and 31.9%, 47.3%, and 69.0% of ADL-treated patients lost response at year 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Multivariable regression analyses showed that low drug concentration was the major independent risk factor associated with LOR for both drugs (B). In patients who developed immunogenicity, factors associated with subsequent drug clearance were lower week 14 drug level (p<0.01), non-immunomodulator use (p=0.04), and obesity (p<0.01), but not carriage of HLA-DQA1*05 (p<0.34). In the setting of LOR (n = 686 episodes), 42% patients had their anti-TNF dose intensified and 29% exited the study without further action (C). Compared to patients who experienced LOR with optimal drug levels, dose intensification was associated with lower rates of drug persistence in patients with immunogenic-pharmacokinetic and non-immunogenic pharmacokinetic treatment failure in patients treated with IFX, but not ADL (D). Long term remission was observed in about 40% of patients treated with IFX and ADL. Loss of response and non-remission was predicted by low drug levels.
P798了解抗肿瘤坏死因子治疗失败:抗肿瘤坏死因子治疗反应丧失的机制和管理,来自PANTS研究的三年数据
PANTS(个体化抗肿瘤坏死因子治疗克罗恩病)是一项英国范围内的前瞻性观察性研究,旨在调查英夫利昔单抗(IFX)和阿达木单抗(ADL)治疗活动期管腔性克罗恩病的有效性。在这里,我们报告了三年随访期间的缓解率;反应丧失率和预测反应丧失的因素;以及剂量强化对药物持久性的影响。缓解定义为CRP≤3mg /L, HBI≤4分(儿童sPCDAI≤15分),无需皮质类固醇治疗或因治疗失败退出。LOR定义为在第14周开始对抗tnf治疗有反应并在PANTS延长期继续的患者,有症状的IBD活性,需要增加皮质类固醇、免疫调节或抗tnf治疗、切除手术或因不良事件退出。采用IDKmonitor®酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA),以最佳抗肿瘤坏死因子药物水平(IFX 7、ADL 12) (mg/L)和抗体(抗IFX 9、抗ADL 6) (AU/mL)进行分层,观察LOR时剂量强化对药物持续性的影响。在2013年3月至2016年7月期间,1610名患者被纳入PANTS: 358/955(37%)患者接受IFX治疗(221/358[62%]原药,137/358[38%]使用生物仿制药)和187/655(29%)患者接受ADL治疗,在第一年末未因治疗失败退出,选择参加延期试验。总体而言,IFX治疗患者的41.8%、39.4%和41.3%以及adl治疗患者的38.2%、39.7%和39.2%分别在第1年、第2年和第3年缓解。对于这两种药物,我们观察到第14周药物浓度与后期时间点缓解状态之间的剂量反应相关性(a)。IFX-的34.3%,54.0%和60.3%,adl治疗的患者分别在第1年,第2年和第3年失去反应。多变量回归分析显示,低药物浓度是两种药物发生LOR的主要独立危险因素(B)。在发生免疫原性的患者中,与随后的药物清除率相关的因素是第14周药物水平较低(p<0.01)、非免疫调节剂使用(p=0.04)和肥胖(p<0.01),但与HLA-DQA1*05携带者无关(p<0.34)。在LOR (n = 686次)的情况下,42%的患者加强了抗tnf剂量,29%的患者在没有进一步治疗的情况下退出了研究(C)。与经历过最佳药物水平的LOR的患者相比,剂量加强与IFX治疗中免疫原药代动力学和非免疫原药代动力学治疗失败的患者的药物持久性较低相关。但没有ADL (D)。约40%的患者接受IFX和ADL治疗后出现长期缓解。低药物水平预测反应丧失和非缓解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信