Utilization Method and Effect Evaluation of Systems Thinking in Future Design: Comparative Analysis of Policy-Making Workshops in Local Governments

Yutaka Nomaguchi, Ryotaro Senoo, Shinya Fukutomi, K. Hara, K. Fujita
{"title":"Utilization Method and Effect Evaluation of Systems Thinking in Future Design: Comparative Analysis of Policy-Making Workshops in Local Governments","authors":"Yutaka Nomaguchi, Ryotaro Senoo, Shinya Fukutomi, K. Hara, K. Fujita","doi":"10.20965/ijat.2023.p0183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Future Design (FD) workshop (FDWS) is a discussion framework based on FD. The aim of FD is to activate a human trait called futurability, considering the preferences of future generations. Previous FD practices with the theme of policy-making in local governments have demonstrated this possibility. However, creating concrete proposals might depend on workshop participants’ abilities and emotions to perceive future society. By comparing two case studies, this study examines the effects of a method for utilizing a causal loop diagram (CLD), a tool for systems thinking, in FDWS to systematically draw the future society and activate discussions among the participants. CLD is a qualitative system model that helps identify the factors that lead to systemic problems and analyze the guidelines for solving them. Its effects on the performance of the FDWS discussion activity are evaluated. They are quantified by text mining analysis using participants’ remark records. Two case studies conducted at policy-making workshops in the local governments of Japan are examined. One is the FDWS in Kyoto City which adopted the proposed CLD utilization method, and the other is the FDWS in Suita City without CLD. The comparative analysis demonstrates that the proposed method makes the discussion livelier, less divergent, and more developed in the FDWS.","PeriodicalId":13583,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Autom. Technol.","volume":"2 1","pages":"183-193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Autom. Technol.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2023.p0183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Future Design (FD) workshop (FDWS) is a discussion framework based on FD. The aim of FD is to activate a human trait called futurability, considering the preferences of future generations. Previous FD practices with the theme of policy-making in local governments have demonstrated this possibility. However, creating concrete proposals might depend on workshop participants’ abilities and emotions to perceive future society. By comparing two case studies, this study examines the effects of a method for utilizing a causal loop diagram (CLD), a tool for systems thinking, in FDWS to systematically draw the future society and activate discussions among the participants. CLD is a qualitative system model that helps identify the factors that lead to systemic problems and analyze the guidelines for solving them. Its effects on the performance of the FDWS discussion activity are evaluated. They are quantified by text mining analysis using participants’ remark records. Two case studies conducted at policy-making workshops in the local governments of Japan are examined. One is the FDWS in Kyoto City which adopted the proposed CLD utilization method, and the other is the FDWS in Suita City without CLD. The comparative analysis demonstrates that the proposed method makes the discussion livelier, less divergent, and more developed in the FDWS.
系统思维在未来设计中的运用方法与效果评价:地方政府决策研讨会的比较分析
未来设计研讨会(FDWS)是一个基于未来设计的讨论框架。FD的目的是激活一种被称为未来能力的人类特征,考虑后代的偏好。以往以地方政府决策为主题的FD实践已经证明了这种可能性。然而,提出具体的建议可能取决于研讨会参与者感知未来社会的能力和情绪。通过两个案例的比较,本研究考察了利用因果循环图(CLD)这一系统思维工具在FDWS中系统地描绘未来社会并激发参与者之间讨论的效果。CLD是一种定性的系统模型,它有助于识别导致系统问题的因素,并分析解决这些问题的指导方针。评估了其对FDWS讨论活动性能的影响。使用参与者的评论记录,通过文本挖掘分析对其进行量化。本文审查了在日本地方政府决策讲习班上进行的两个案例研究。一种是采用CLD利用方法的京都市FDWS,另一种是不采用CLD的水田市FDWS。对比分析表明,所提出的方法使FDWS的讨论更活跃、分歧更小、更发达。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信