{"title":"A Comparative Report on Appraisal of Public Finance Management of Ghana and\nMalawi","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/jhss.03.02.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To assist with assessment and improvement in Public Finance management (PFM), the 2016 Public Expenditure\nFinancial Accountability (PEFA) was used to measure 2018 PFM performance of all countries. This report compares\nand assesses the 2018 PFM performance of Ghana and Malawi. A detailed assessment of performance in terms of the\nseven pillars of the PFM system was done which provided analysis and measurement of results in terms of the 31\nperformance indicators (PIs) of PFM performance. Assessing all the seven (7) pillars with their indicators and\ndimensions together, it was realized that on an ordinal scale, Malawi’s PFM performance is higher than that of Ghana.\nThus, Malawi is appraised with having a higher PFM performance than Ghana. It is therefore recommended that\nfurther investigation is done to identify the loopholes and leakages in the PFM of Ghana and duly sealed for the\ncountry’s PFM to be more reliable.","PeriodicalId":32779,"journal":{"name":"Mizoram University Journal of Humanities Social Sciences","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mizoram University Journal of Humanities Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/jhss.03.02.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To assist with assessment and improvement in Public Finance management (PFM), the 2016 Public Expenditure
Financial Accountability (PEFA) was used to measure 2018 PFM performance of all countries. This report compares
and assesses the 2018 PFM performance of Ghana and Malawi. A detailed assessment of performance in terms of the
seven pillars of the PFM system was done which provided analysis and measurement of results in terms of the 31
performance indicators (PIs) of PFM performance. Assessing all the seven (7) pillars with their indicators and
dimensions together, it was realized that on an ordinal scale, Malawi’s PFM performance is higher than that of Ghana.
Thus, Malawi is appraised with having a higher PFM performance than Ghana. It is therefore recommended that
further investigation is done to identify the loopholes and leakages in the PFM of Ghana and duly sealed for the
country’s PFM to be more reliable.