A Comparative Report on Appraisal of Public Finance Management of Ghana and Malawi

{"title":"A Comparative Report on Appraisal of Public Finance Management of Ghana and\nMalawi","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/jhss.03.02.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To assist with assessment and improvement in Public Finance management (PFM), the 2016 Public Expenditure\nFinancial Accountability (PEFA) was used to measure 2018 PFM performance of all countries. This report compares\nand assesses the 2018 PFM performance of Ghana and Malawi. A detailed assessment of performance in terms of the\nseven pillars of the PFM system was done which provided analysis and measurement of results in terms of the 31\nperformance indicators (PIs) of PFM performance. Assessing all the seven (7) pillars with their indicators and\ndimensions together, it was realized that on an ordinal scale, Malawi’s PFM performance is higher than that of Ghana.\nThus, Malawi is appraised with having a higher PFM performance than Ghana. It is therefore recommended that\nfurther investigation is done to identify the loopholes and leakages in the PFM of Ghana and duly sealed for the\ncountry’s PFM to be more reliable.","PeriodicalId":32779,"journal":{"name":"Mizoram University Journal of Humanities Social Sciences","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mizoram University Journal of Humanities Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/jhss.03.02.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To assist with assessment and improvement in Public Finance management (PFM), the 2016 Public Expenditure Financial Accountability (PEFA) was used to measure 2018 PFM performance of all countries. This report compares and assesses the 2018 PFM performance of Ghana and Malawi. A detailed assessment of performance in terms of the seven pillars of the PFM system was done which provided analysis and measurement of results in terms of the 31 performance indicators (PIs) of PFM performance. Assessing all the seven (7) pillars with their indicators and dimensions together, it was realized that on an ordinal scale, Malawi’s PFM performance is higher than that of Ghana. Thus, Malawi is appraised with having a higher PFM performance than Ghana. It is therefore recommended that further investigation is done to identify the loopholes and leakages in the PFM of Ghana and duly sealed for the country’s PFM to be more reliable.
加纳与马拉维公共财政管理评估比较报告
为了协助评估和改进公共财政管理,2016年公共支出财务问责制(PEFA)用于衡量所有国家2018年公共财政管理的绩效。本报告比较和评估了加纳和马拉维2018年的减贫基金绩效。根据PFM系统的七个支柱进行了详细的绩效评估,并根据PFM性能的31个绩效指标(pi)对结果进行了分析和测量。综合评估所有七(7)个支柱的指标和维度,人们意识到,在序数尺度上,马拉维的PFM表现高于加纳。因此,马拉维被评价具有比加纳更高的PFM绩效。因此,建议进行进一步调查,以确定加纳PFM的漏洞和泄漏,并适当密封,使该国的PFM更加可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信