The Involvement Of Austin's Ideas In Semantics

Dimjati Ahmadin
{"title":"The Involvement Of Austin's Ideas In Semantics","authors":"Dimjati Ahmadin","doi":"10.18860/ua.v5i1.6142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are instructions from the theory of speech acts that in the initial period, there were differences of opinion among experts. Philosophy, just like the difference between Ibnu Sina and Thomas Hobbes, the first time to examine the problem firmly and complete namely research conducted by J.L. Austin (linguist). This library research intends to study whether two prominent writers in the field semantics namely John Lyons in his book \"Linguistic Semantics\" and Ruth Kempson in his book \"Semantic Theory\" involves Austin's ideas in discussion they. Based on the data obtained and the discussions that have been carried out, it can be concluded that the two semantic experts involved Austin ideas in their discussion in semantics. However, the way they involve ideas Austin in their discussion varies from one another, ha / this is in line with the development of social sciences which have never been constant including semantics, as mentioned in previous discussions. Furthermore, it can also be concluded that the two semantic experts took advantage of Austin's ideas in their discussion, even though sometimes their opinions are different from Austin.","PeriodicalId":53390,"journal":{"name":"Ulul Albab Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulul Albab Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v5i1.6142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are instructions from the theory of speech acts that in the initial period, there were differences of opinion among experts. Philosophy, just like the difference between Ibnu Sina and Thomas Hobbes, the first time to examine the problem firmly and complete namely research conducted by J.L. Austin (linguist). This library research intends to study whether two prominent writers in the field semantics namely John Lyons in his book "Linguistic Semantics" and Ruth Kempson in his book "Semantic Theory" involves Austin's ideas in discussion they. Based on the data obtained and the discussions that have been carried out, it can be concluded that the two semantic experts involved Austin ideas in their discussion in semantics. However, the way they involve ideas Austin in their discussion varies from one another, ha / this is in line with the development of social sciences which have never been constant including semantics, as mentioned in previous discussions. Furthermore, it can also be concluded that the two semantic experts took advantage of Austin's ideas in their discussion, even though sometimes their opinions are different from Austin.
奥斯丁思想在语义学中的介入
从言语行为理论来看,在最初的阶段,专家之间存在着意见分歧。哲学,就像伊布·西那和托马斯·霍布斯之间的差异一样,第一次坚定地审视这个问题并完成的即是J.L.奥斯汀(语言学家)所进行的研究。本图书馆研究旨在研究语义学领域的两位杰出作家,即约翰·莱昂斯(John Lyons)的《语言语义学》(Linguistic semantics)和露丝·肯普森(Ruth Kempson)的《语义理论》(Semantic Theory),是否在讨论中涉及奥斯汀的观点。根据获得的数据和已经进行的讨论,可以得出结论,两位语义专家在他们的语义讨论中涉及了奥斯汀思想。然而,他们在讨论中涉及思想的方式各不相同,这与社会科学的发展是一致的,社会科学从来都不是恒定的,包括语义学,正如前面的讨论所提到的。此外,我们还可以得出结论,这两位语义专家在他们的讨论中利用了奥斯汀的观点,尽管有时他们的观点与奥斯汀不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信