To Update or Not to Update: Insights From a Two-Year Study of Android App Evolution

Vincent F. Taylor, I. Martinovic
{"title":"To Update or Not to Update: Insights From a Two-Year Study of Android App Evolution","authors":"Vincent F. Taylor, I. Martinovic","doi":"10.1145/3052973.3052990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although there are over 1,900,000 third-party Android apps in the Google Play Store, little is understood about how their security and privacy characteristics, such as dangerous permission usage and the vulnerabilities they contain, have evolved over time. Our research is two-fold: we take quarterly snapshots of the Google Play Store over a two-year period to understand how permission usage by apps has changed; and we analyse 30,000 apps to understand how their security and privacy characteristics have changed over the same two-year period. Extrapolating our findings, we estimate that over 35,000 apps in the Google Play Store ask for additional dangerous permissions every three months. Our statistically significant observations suggest that free apps and popular apps are more likely to ask for additional dangerous permissions when they are updated. Worryingly, we discover that Android apps are not getting safer as they are updated. In many cases, app updates serve to increase the number of distinct vulnerabilities contained within apps, especially for popular apps. We conclude with recommendations to stakeholders for improving the security of the Android ecosystem.","PeriodicalId":20540,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"51","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3052973.3052990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 51

Abstract

Although there are over 1,900,000 third-party Android apps in the Google Play Store, little is understood about how their security and privacy characteristics, such as dangerous permission usage and the vulnerabilities they contain, have evolved over time. Our research is two-fold: we take quarterly snapshots of the Google Play Store over a two-year period to understand how permission usage by apps has changed; and we analyse 30,000 apps to understand how their security and privacy characteristics have changed over the same two-year period. Extrapolating our findings, we estimate that over 35,000 apps in the Google Play Store ask for additional dangerous permissions every three months. Our statistically significant observations suggest that free apps and popular apps are more likely to ask for additional dangerous permissions when they are updated. Worryingly, we discover that Android apps are not getting safer as they are updated. In many cases, app updates serve to increase the number of distinct vulnerabilities contained within apps, especially for popular apps. We conclude with recommendations to stakeholders for improving the security of the Android ecosystem.
更新还是不更新:来自Android应用演变的两年研究见解
尽管b谷歌Play Store中有超过1,900,000个第三方Android应用程序,但人们对它们的安全和隐私特征(如危险的权限使用和它们包含的漏洞)如何随着时间的推移而演变知之甚少。我们的研究是双重的:我们在两年的时间里,每季度对b谷歌Play Store进行快照,以了解应用程序的使用权限是如何变化的;我们分析了3万个应用程序,以了解它们的安全和隐私特征在两年内是如何变化的。根据我们的调查结果,我们估计b谷歌Play Store中每三个月就有超过35,000个应用请求额外的危险权限。我们的统计数据表明,免费应用和流行应用在更新时更有可能要求额外的危险权限。令人担忧的是,我们发现Android应用程序并没有随着更新而变得更安全。在许多情况下,应用程序更新会增加应用程序中包含的不同漏洞的数量,特别是对于流行的应用程序。最后,我们向利益相关者提出了改善Android生态系统安全性的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信