Determination of Red Blood Cell Distribution Width in Patients with Primary Cutaneous Vasculitis Compared to Systemic Vasculitis

Q4 Medicine
Farhana Wahab, M. J. Uddin, A. Asaduzzaman, Mohammod Abu Hena Chowdhury, H. Mahmud, Rehnuma Nasim
{"title":"Determination of Red Blood Cell Distribution Width in Patients with Primary Cutaneous Vasculitis Compared to Systemic Vasculitis","authors":"Farhana Wahab, M. J. Uddin, A. Asaduzzaman, Mohammod Abu Hena Chowdhury, H. Mahmud, Rehnuma Nasim","doi":"10.3329/medtoday.v33i2.56049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) has been considered as an inflammatory marker in various disorders. Evaluation of RDW value can also be used as a novel and additional marker for differentiating systemic vasculitis from primary cutaneous vasculitis. Objective: To compare RDW value between patients with cutaneous vasculitis with systemic vasculitis, thereafter to find out it's role as an effective indicator to distinguish both forms of vasculitis.\nMaterials and Methods: This cross sectional observational study was conduct between from July 2016 to December 2017. Total of 48 patients were divided into primary cutaneous vasculitis and systemic vasculitis. Blood was collected in EDTA tube to measure RDW value. Patient’s disease activity also scored and plotted according to Birmingham vasculitis activity score. Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS.\nResults: Significantly high mean RDW were found in patients with systemic vasculitis compared to primary cutaneous vasculitis (15.09±0.92 vs. 13.48±1.1, p = 0.000). BVAS was significantly greater (13.93±5.10 vs. 4.87±2.69, p = < 0.001) in systemic vasculitis as well as in patients with high RDW group (11.73±5.71 vs. 5.37±3.96, p = < 0.001). Optimal RDW cut off point for differentiating systemic vasculitis from cutaneous vasculitis was 14.2 with 81.3% sensitivity and 81.2% specificity.\n Conclusion: Present study revealed importance of RDW monitoring along with disease activity in patients with any form of vasculitis. Systemic vasculitis had higher level of RDW. So RDW can be considered as a marker to discriminate systemic vasculitis from primary cutaneous vasculitis.\nMedicine Today 2021 Vol.33(2): 84-89","PeriodicalId":39348,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Today","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/medtoday.v33i2.56049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) has been considered as an inflammatory marker in various disorders. Evaluation of RDW value can also be used as a novel and additional marker for differentiating systemic vasculitis from primary cutaneous vasculitis. Objective: To compare RDW value between patients with cutaneous vasculitis with systemic vasculitis, thereafter to find out it's role as an effective indicator to distinguish both forms of vasculitis. Materials and Methods: This cross sectional observational study was conduct between from July 2016 to December 2017. Total of 48 patients were divided into primary cutaneous vasculitis and systemic vasculitis. Blood was collected in EDTA tube to measure RDW value. Patient’s disease activity also scored and plotted according to Birmingham vasculitis activity score. Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS. Results: Significantly high mean RDW were found in patients with systemic vasculitis compared to primary cutaneous vasculitis (15.09±0.92 vs. 13.48±1.1, p = 0.000). BVAS was significantly greater (13.93±5.10 vs. 4.87±2.69, p = < 0.001) in systemic vasculitis as well as in patients with high RDW group (11.73±5.71 vs. 5.37±3.96, p = < 0.001). Optimal RDW cut off point for differentiating systemic vasculitis from cutaneous vasculitis was 14.2 with 81.3% sensitivity and 81.2% specificity.  Conclusion: Present study revealed importance of RDW monitoring along with disease activity in patients with any form of vasculitis. Systemic vasculitis had higher level of RDW. So RDW can be considered as a marker to discriminate systemic vasculitis from primary cutaneous vasculitis. Medicine Today 2021 Vol.33(2): 84-89
原发性皮肤血管炎与全身性血管炎患者红细胞分布宽度的测定
红细胞分布宽度(RDW)被认为是各种疾病的炎症标志物。RDW值的评估也可以作为区分系统性血管炎和原发性皮肤血管炎的一种新的和额外的标志物。目的:比较皮肤血管炎与全身性血管炎患者的RDW值,探讨其作为区分两种血管炎的有效指标的作用。材料与方法:本横断面观察性研究于2016年7月至2017年12月进行。48例患者分为原发性皮肤血管炎和全身性血管炎。EDTA管采血测定RDW值。患者的疾病活动性也根据伯明翰血管炎活动性评分进行评分和绘图。采用SPSS软件进行统计学分析。结果:全身性血管炎患者的平均RDW明显高于原发性皮肤血管炎患者(15.09±0.92比13.48±1.1,p = 0.000)。全身性血管炎组BVAS(13.93±5.10比4.87±2.69,p = < 0.001)显著高于高RDW组(11.73±5.71比5.37±3.96,p = < 0.001)。鉴别全身血管炎与皮肤血管炎的最佳RDW分界点为14.2,敏感性81.3%,特异性81.2%。结论:本研究揭示了在任何形式的血管炎患者中监测RDW与疾病活动的重要性。全身性血管炎的RDW水平较高。因此,RDW可作为区分全身血管炎和原发性皮肤血管炎的标志。医学今日2021卷33(2):84-89
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicine Today
Medicine Today Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信