Thermodynamic cycle analysis of Mobile Air Conditioning system using HFO-1234yf as an alternative replacement of HFC-134a

Jignesh Gohel, R. Kapadia
{"title":"Thermodynamic cycle analysis of Mobile Air Conditioning system using HFO-1234yf as an alternative replacement of HFC-134a","authors":"Jignesh Gohel, R. Kapadia","doi":"10.4172/2167-7670.1000129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents thermodynamic cycle analysis of mobile air conditioning system using HFO1234yf as alternative replacement for HFC-134a. Under a wide range of working conditions (Varying Condensing temperature, Evaporating temperature, Sub cooling and sub heating with Internal heat exchanger (IHX) and without internal heat exchanger) on simple vapor compression system, we compare the energy performance of both refrigerants - R134a and HFO1234yf. Result shows that without using an Internal heat exchanger, At lower condensing temperature (35oC), Mass flow rate increases about 27-32%, refrigerating effect decreases 22-25%, co mpressor work increases 4-6% and COP decreases about 3-5%. While at higher condensing temperature (55oC), mass flow rate increases about 35-42%, refrigerating capacity decreases 27-30%, and compressor work increases 8-13% and COP decreases 7-10%. Using an internal heat exchanger (IHX), these differences in the energy performance are significantly reduced. At lower condensing temperature (35oC), mass flow rate decreases about 18-22%, refrigerating capacity decreases 15-18%, compressor work increases 1-3% and COP decreases about 2-3% and At higher condensing temperature (55oC), mass flow rate decreases 23-28%, refrigerating capacity decreases 18-22%, compressor work increases 5-8% and COP decreases about 4-7%. The energy performance parameters of HFO1234yf are close to those obtained with HFC-134a at Low condensing temperature and making use of an IHX. Even though the values of performance parameters for HFO1234yf are smaller than that of HFC-134a, but difference is small so it can be a good alternative to HFC-134a because of its environmental friendly properties with introducing IHX.","PeriodicalId":7286,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Automobile Engineering","volume":"40 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Automobile Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-7670.1000129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper presents thermodynamic cycle analysis of mobile air conditioning system using HFO1234yf as alternative replacement for HFC-134a. Under a wide range of working conditions (Varying Condensing temperature, Evaporating temperature, Sub cooling and sub heating with Internal heat exchanger (IHX) and without internal heat exchanger) on simple vapor compression system, we compare the energy performance of both refrigerants - R134a and HFO1234yf. Result shows that without using an Internal heat exchanger, At lower condensing temperature (35oC), Mass flow rate increases about 27-32%, refrigerating effect decreases 22-25%, co mpressor work increases 4-6% and COP decreases about 3-5%. While at higher condensing temperature (55oC), mass flow rate increases about 35-42%, refrigerating capacity decreases 27-30%, and compressor work increases 8-13% and COP decreases 7-10%. Using an internal heat exchanger (IHX), these differences in the energy performance are significantly reduced. At lower condensing temperature (35oC), mass flow rate decreases about 18-22%, refrigerating capacity decreases 15-18%, compressor work increases 1-3% and COP decreases about 2-3% and At higher condensing temperature (55oC), mass flow rate decreases 23-28%, refrigerating capacity decreases 18-22%, compressor work increases 5-8% and COP decreases about 4-7%. The energy performance parameters of HFO1234yf are close to those obtained with HFC-134a at Low condensing temperature and making use of an IHX. Even though the values of performance parameters for HFO1234yf are smaller than that of HFC-134a, but difference is small so it can be a good alternative to HFC-134a because of its environmental friendly properties with introducing IHX.
HFO-1234yf替代HFC-134a移动空调系统热力循环分析
本文对HFO1234yf作为HFC-134a替代材料的移动空调系统进行了热力循环分析。在简单蒸汽压缩系统的多种工况下(不同的冷凝温度、蒸发温度、带内热交换器(IHX)和不带内热交换器),对R134a和HFO1234yf两种制冷剂的能量性能进行了比较。结果表明,在较低的冷凝温度(35℃)下,无内换热时,质量流量增加约27-32%,制冷效果降低22-25%,压缩机功增加4-6%,COP降低约3-5%。在较高的冷凝温度(55℃)下,质量流量增加35 ~ 42%,制冷量减少27 ~ 30%,压缩机功增加8 ~ 13%,COP降低7 ~ 10%。使用内部热交换器(IHX),这些差异在能源性能显著减少。在较低的冷凝温度(35℃)下,质量流量下降约18-22%,制冷量下降15-18%,压缩机功增加1-3%,COP下降约2-3%;在较高的冷凝温度(55℃)下,质量流量下降23-28%,制冷量下降18-22%,压缩机功增加5-8%,COP下降约4-7%。HFO1234yf的能量性能参数与HFC-134a在低冷凝温度下使用IHX获得的能量性能参数接近。虽然HFO1234yf的性能参数值比HFC-134a小,但由于其引入IHX后的环保性,可以很好地替代HFC-134a。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信