Management of paediatric ectopia lentis at an Indonesian referral hospital: A retrospective review

Julie D. Barliana, D. Yulia, Diajeng A. Soeharto
{"title":"Management of paediatric ectopia lentis at an Indonesian referral hospital: A retrospective review","authors":"Julie D. Barliana, D. Yulia, Diajeng A. Soeharto","doi":"10.4102/aveh.v81i1.768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ectopia lentis in children is rare and often associated with systemic conditions. Left untreated, it can lead to visually debilitating complications. Although there are various techniques available, no current consensus for treatment of paediatric ectopia lentis exists.Aim: To describe the management and visual outcomes of paediatric ectopia lentis in an academic referral hospital.Setting: This study was conducted at Cipto Mangunkusumo National Central General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on the medical records of all paediatric ectopia lentis patients treated at our hospital, from 2011 to 2020. Primary outcomes include uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), treatment, surgical technique, selection of intraocular lens (IOL), and postoperative complications.Results: This study included 66 eyes of 39 patients. Average age at initial presentation was 7.8 (2–17) years. Aetiology was mostly non-traumatic, whilst four were secondary to trauma. All eyes except one underwent surgery, and IOLs were inserted in 57.4% of the non-traumatic cohort, with iris-claw IOL as the most popular choice (85.7%). Uncorrected visual acuity and BCVA significantly improved in pseudophakic and aphakic groups (p  0.05). Nearly 60% achieved a BCVA of 6/12 or greater, and the proportion was higher amongst pseudophakic group. Ten eyes had post-operative complications, with a median onset of 393 (1–1095) days after surgery.Conclusion: With varied techniques used to manage paediatric ectopia lentis, the choice of technique was dependent on individual patient condition and surgeon preference. Whilst the proportion of eyes with BCVA of ≥ 6/12 was higher amongst the pseudophakic eyes than aphakic eyes, IOL implantation entails the risk of complications, whereas no complications occurred in those left aphakic. Therefore, no particular technique can be considered marginally superior to the other, and larger studies are needed.","PeriodicalId":7694,"journal":{"name":"African Vision and Eye Health","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Vision and Eye Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/aveh.v81i1.768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ectopia lentis in children is rare and often associated with systemic conditions. Left untreated, it can lead to visually debilitating complications. Although there are various techniques available, no current consensus for treatment of paediatric ectopia lentis exists.Aim: To describe the management and visual outcomes of paediatric ectopia lentis in an academic referral hospital.Setting: This study was conducted at Cipto Mangunkusumo National Central General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on the medical records of all paediatric ectopia lentis patients treated at our hospital, from 2011 to 2020. Primary outcomes include uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), treatment, surgical technique, selection of intraocular lens (IOL), and postoperative complications.Results: This study included 66 eyes of 39 patients. Average age at initial presentation was 7.8 (2–17) years. Aetiology was mostly non-traumatic, whilst four were secondary to trauma. All eyes except one underwent surgery, and IOLs were inserted in 57.4% of the non-traumatic cohort, with iris-claw IOL as the most popular choice (85.7%). Uncorrected visual acuity and BCVA significantly improved in pseudophakic and aphakic groups (p  0.05). Nearly 60% achieved a BCVA of 6/12 or greater, and the proportion was higher amongst pseudophakic group. Ten eyes had post-operative complications, with a median onset of 393 (1–1095) days after surgery.Conclusion: With varied techniques used to manage paediatric ectopia lentis, the choice of technique was dependent on individual patient condition and surgeon preference. Whilst the proportion of eyes with BCVA of ≥ 6/12 was higher amongst the pseudophakic eyes than aphakic eyes, IOL implantation entails the risk of complications, whereas no complications occurred in those left aphakic. Therefore, no particular technique can be considered marginally superior to the other, and larger studies are needed.
印度尼西亚一家转诊医院的儿童异位晶状体的处理:一项回顾性审查
背景:儿童晶状体异位是罕见的,通常与全身性疾病有关。如果不及时治疗,它会导致视力衰弱的并发症。虽然有各种可用的技术,目前没有共识的治疗儿童异位的晶状体存在。目的:介绍某学术转诊医院对儿童异位晶状体的处理及视力结果。背景:本研究在印度尼西亚雅加达Cipto Mangunkusumo国立中央综合医院进行。方法:回顾性分析我院2011年至2020年收治的所有小儿晶状体异位患者的病历。主要结局包括未矫正视力(UCVA)、最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、治疗方法、手术技术、人工晶状体(IOL)的选择和术后并发症。结果:本研究纳入39例66只眼。初次发病的平均年龄为7.8岁(2-17岁)。病因主要是非创伤性的,而4例继发于创伤。除一只眼睛外,所有的眼睛都接受了手术,非创伤队列中有57.4%的人植入了人工晶状体,虹膜-爪形人工晶状体是最受欢迎的选择(85.7%)。假晶状体组和无晶状体组未矫正视力和BCVA明显改善(p < 0.05)。近60%的患者BCVA达到6/12或更高,其中假性近视组的比例更高。10只眼出现术后并发症,中位发病时间为术后393(1-1095)天。结论:采用多种技术处理小儿晶状体异位,技术的选择取决于个体患者的情况和外科医生的偏好。假性晶状体眼中BCVA≥6/12的比例高于无晶状体眼,但人工晶状体植入术存在并发症风险,而无晶状体眼无并发症发生。因此,没有哪一种技术可以被认为比另一种技术略微优越,需要进行更大规模的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Vision and Eye Health
African Vision and Eye Health Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信