Ambrosiaster and Damasus: A Presbyter’s Perspective on Clerical Misconduct

Q3 Arts and Humanities
D. Hunter
{"title":"Ambrosiaster and Damasus: A Presbyter’s Perspective on Clerical Misconduct","authors":"D. Hunter","doi":"10.1484/j.se.5.119455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay examines the comments of the fourth-century Roman exegete, now called “Ambrosiaster”, on the problem of misconduct of the clergy. In a manner that anticipated Augustine’s arguments against the Donatists, Ambrosiaster argued that the authority of a church office could not be demeaned by the misconduct of any individual cleric. I argue that one context of Ambrosiaster’s thinking on the problem of clerical misconduct was the troubled pontificate of Damasus and the numerous criticisms of the clergy that emerged at this time.","PeriodicalId":39610,"journal":{"name":"Sacris Erudiri","volume":"364 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sacris Erudiri","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1484/j.se.5.119455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay examines the comments of the fourth-century Roman exegete, now called “Ambrosiaster”, on the problem of misconduct of the clergy. In a manner that anticipated Augustine’s arguments against the Donatists, Ambrosiaster argued that the authority of a church office could not be demeaned by the misconduct of any individual cleric. I argue that one context of Ambrosiaster’s thinking on the problem of clerical misconduct was the troubled pontificate of Damasus and the numerous criticisms of the clergy that emerged at this time.
安布罗西亚斯特和达玛斯:一位长老对神职人员不当行为的看法
本文考察了四世纪罗马注释家的评论,现在被称为“Ambrosiaster”,关于神职人员不当行为的问题。以一种预见到奥古斯丁反对多纳派的观点的方式,安布罗西亚斯特认为,教会的权威不能被任何神职人员的不当行为所贬低。我认为,Ambrosiaster思考神职人员不当行为问题的一个背景是,达玛斯的教皇任期陷入困境,以及当时出现的对神职人员的众多批评。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sacris Erudiri
Sacris Erudiri Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Sacris Erudiri is an international journal of religious sciences in its broadest sense. Studies published refer mainly to the history of the Church, the history of liturgy and patristics. Whilst excluding nothing, the topics addressed refer more to factual and institutional history than to doctrinal history. These articles often represent preliminary analyses for later critical editions of patristic and medieval texts to be published in various series of the Corpus Christianorum. Articles are published in English, French, German, Italian and Spanish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信