{"title":"Single-Actuator Vibrotactile Numeric Information Delivery in the Face of Distraction","authors":"Jeffrey R. Blum, J. Cooperstock","doi":"10.1109/WHC.2019.8816082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We test ActiVibe, a previously reported method for communicating numeric values between 1 and 10, to determine whether it remains optimal under conditions reflective of more challenging potential real-world use cases. We thus consider vibrotactile communication in conjunction with an audio distractor task, and when conveying not just one, but three numeric values in succession. Results of a user study comparing three different rendering methods indicate that ActiVibe maintains both accuracy and subjective preference advantages vs. two different duration-based methods when conveying a single value, but largely loses these advantages when presenting three sequential values. Under conditions similar to the most difficult ones we test, a more concise duration-only approach may be preferable for some applications, requiring less power consumption and demanding attention for less total time.","PeriodicalId":6702,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC)","volume":"109 1","pages":"461-466"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WHC.2019.8816082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
We test ActiVibe, a previously reported method for communicating numeric values between 1 and 10, to determine whether it remains optimal under conditions reflective of more challenging potential real-world use cases. We thus consider vibrotactile communication in conjunction with an audio distractor task, and when conveying not just one, but three numeric values in succession. Results of a user study comparing three different rendering methods indicate that ActiVibe maintains both accuracy and subjective preference advantages vs. two different duration-based methods when conveying a single value, but largely loses these advantages when presenting three sequential values. Under conditions similar to the most difficult ones we test, a more concise duration-only approach may be preferable for some applications, requiring less power consumption and demanding attention for less total time.