Evaluation of the accuracy of light polymerizing tray material for splinting in open tray implant impressions: An In-vitro 3D Spatial Analysis.

Manisha Sharma, Nitasha Gandhi, Nirmal Kurian, Kevin George Varghese, Nishanth A sudharson, Nitika Gupta
{"title":"Evaluation of the accuracy of light polymerizing tray material for splinting in open tray implant impressions: An In-vitro 3D Spatial Analysis.","authors":"Manisha Sharma, Nitasha Gandhi, Nirmal Kurian, Kevin George Varghese, Nishanth A sudharson, Nitika Gupta","doi":"10.21276//ujds.2023.9.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims and objective: Precise reproduction of the intra-oral spatial relationship of implants with an impression becomes the first step in achieving an accurate, passively fitting prosthesis. This in vitro study aims to compare the dimensional accuracy of dental implants in casts obtained from open tray splinted implant impression techniques using two different splinting materials. \nMethods and Material: A mandibular acrylic model with four implant analogues was used as a reference model. Open tray impression copings were attached to the implant analogues and were splinted using two different materials. Group I-splinted with pattern resin, sectioned and re-joined and Group II- splinted with light cure tray material. Eight polyether impressions were made for each group and poured in type IV dental stone. The casts retrieved from each group were three-dimensionally analysed using coordinate measuring machine with 0.001 mm accuracy. A one-way ANOVA and post hoc test was done to calculate the statistically significant difference between the groups. \nResults: The present study revealed no significant difference in the inter-implant distances obtained from pattern resin splinted group, whereas, significant difference in z-axis  was found in light polymerising tray resin splinted group when compared to the values obtained from the reference model. \nConclusions: Casts obtained from splinting the impression copings using pattern resin before making implant impression were found to be more accurate than splinting with light cure tray material.","PeriodicalId":100856,"journal":{"name":"King Saud University Journal of Dental Sciences","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"King Saud University Journal of Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21276//ujds.2023.9.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims and objective: Precise reproduction of the intra-oral spatial relationship of implants with an impression becomes the first step in achieving an accurate, passively fitting prosthesis. This in vitro study aims to compare the dimensional accuracy of dental implants in casts obtained from open tray splinted implant impression techniques using two different splinting materials. Methods and Material: A mandibular acrylic model with four implant analogues was used as a reference model. Open tray impression copings were attached to the implant analogues and were splinted using two different materials. Group I-splinted with pattern resin, sectioned and re-joined and Group II- splinted with light cure tray material. Eight polyether impressions were made for each group and poured in type IV dental stone. The casts retrieved from each group were three-dimensionally analysed using coordinate measuring machine with 0.001 mm accuracy. A one-way ANOVA and post hoc test was done to calculate the statistically significant difference between the groups. Results: The present study revealed no significant difference in the inter-implant distances obtained from pattern resin splinted group, whereas, significant difference in z-axis  was found in light polymerising tray resin splinted group when compared to the values obtained from the reference model. Conclusions: Casts obtained from splinting the impression copings using pattern resin before making implant impression were found to be more accurate than splinting with light cure tray material.
评估轻聚合托盘材料的准确性夹板在开放托盘种植印象:一个体外三维空间分析。
目的和目的:准确再现种植体与印模的口腔内空间关系是实现准确,被动拟合假体的第一步。这项体外研究的目的是比较两种不同的夹板材料使用开盘夹板种植体印模技术获得的牙种植体的尺寸精度。方法和材料:采用丙烯酸树脂下颌骨模型和四种种植体类似物作为参考模型。开盘印模覆盖物附着在植入物类似物上,并使用两种不同的材料夹板固定。i组夹板采用模板树脂,切片再连接;II组夹板采用光固化托盘材料。每组8个聚醚印模,倒入IV型牙石。使用三坐标测量机对每组铸件进行三维分析,精度为0.001 mm。采用单因素方差分析和事后检验来计算组间的统计学显著差异。结果:本研究显示,模式树脂夹板组获得的种植体间距离无显著差异,而轻聚合托盘树脂夹板组与参考模型获得的值相比,z轴有显著差异。结论:种植体印模前用模板树脂夹板压模后获得的铸型比光固化托盘材料夹板获得的铸型更准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信