The Digital Critical Apparatus: Thoughts from the Field

IF 0.1 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
Samuel J. Huskey, Hugh Cayless
{"title":"The Digital Critical Apparatus: Thoughts from the Field","authors":"Samuel J. Huskey, Hugh Cayless","doi":"10.1353/tcj.2022.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In this article, we continue the discussion about the future of critical editions begun in volume 112 of The Classical Journal by Keeline and continued in volume 114 by Olson. Written from the point of view of two scholars working in the field of digital philology, the article affirms some elements of Keeline's vision and addresses Olson's concerns about that vision. Concrete examples from an active project that seeks to translate the visual elements of traditional critical editions into machine-readable data reveal that Keeline and Olson's views are not as far apart as they seem.","PeriodicalId":35668,"journal":{"name":"CLASSICAL JOURNAL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CLASSICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tcj.2022.0003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:In this article, we continue the discussion about the future of critical editions begun in volume 112 of The Classical Journal by Keeline and continued in volume 114 by Olson. Written from the point of view of two scholars working in the field of digital philology, the article affirms some elements of Keeline's vision and addresses Olson's concerns about that vision. Concrete examples from an active project that seeks to translate the visual elements of traditional critical editions into machine-readable data reveal that Keeline and Olson's views are not as far apart as they seem.
数字批判仪器:来自现场的思考
摘要:本文将继续讨论Keeline的《古典期刊》(the Classical Journal)第112卷和Olson的《古典期刊》(the Classical Journal)第114卷中批判版本的未来。这篇文章是从数字文献学领域的两位学者的观点出发,肯定了Keeline愿景的一些元素,并解决了Olson对该愿景的担忧。一个正在进行的项目试图将传统批评版本的视觉元素转化为机器可读的数据,其中的具体例子表明,Keeline和Olson的观点并不像他们看起来那么遥远。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CLASSICAL JOURNAL
CLASSICAL JOURNAL Arts and Humanities-Classics
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Classical Journal (ISSN 0009–8353) is published by the Classical Association of the Middle West and South (CAMWS), the largest regional classics association in the United States and Canada, and is now over a century old. All members of CAMWS receive the journal as a benefit of membership; non-member and library subscriptions are also available. CJ appears four times a year (October–November, December–January, February–March, April–May); each issue consists of about 100 pages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信