The Dichotomy of Intimate Garments: Women’s Stays and Pockets in Georgian Britain

Olivia Cotton Cornwall
{"title":"The Dichotomy of Intimate Garments: Women’s Stays and Pockets in Georgian Britain","authors":"Olivia Cotton Cornwall","doi":"10.21971/pi29375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In John Collet’s 1777 print, Tight Lacing, or Fashion Before Ease a woman is depicted holding onto a bed poster as her maid and husband strain to tighten the lacing on her stays. Meanwhile, a large tie-on pocket can be seen hanging from the woman’s waist. Although they were worn closely together on the female body stays and pockets have been studied independently from each other. This is understandable, as at first glance, they appear incomparable. Stays were the precursor to nineteenth century corsets and they moulded the body into the desired and fashionable shape. Pockets on the other hand were utilitarian bags meant for carrying necessary items; separate from women’s clothing they were tied around the waist with string and were hidden under the skirts. Despite the initial differences, these garments did not function independently from each other. Using caricatures, etiquette books, and physical examples found in museum collections, this study demonstrates that when examined in tandem it becomes apparent that stays and pockets served distinct, yet overlapping functions in women’s lives. They informed women’s relationships with their surrounding environments, strengthened women’s connection to the domestic realm, yet also gave women freedom to move outside the home and participate within the public sphere. Furthermore, both items also acted as private spaces, which allowed women to actively partake in romantic courtship and sexual flirtations in a gender appropriate way. By juxtaposing stays and pockets this study contributes to the growing historical discussion surrounding these items, but also begins to piece together a larger picture of the role undergarments, as a whole, played in women’s lives.","PeriodicalId":93671,"journal":{"name":"Past imperfect (Edmonton, Alta.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Past imperfect (Edmonton, Alta.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21971/pi29375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In John Collet’s 1777 print, Tight Lacing, or Fashion Before Ease a woman is depicted holding onto a bed poster as her maid and husband strain to tighten the lacing on her stays. Meanwhile, a large tie-on pocket can be seen hanging from the woman’s waist. Although they were worn closely together on the female body stays and pockets have been studied independently from each other. This is understandable, as at first glance, they appear incomparable. Stays were the precursor to nineteenth century corsets and they moulded the body into the desired and fashionable shape. Pockets on the other hand were utilitarian bags meant for carrying necessary items; separate from women’s clothing they were tied around the waist with string and were hidden under the skirts. Despite the initial differences, these garments did not function independently from each other. Using caricatures, etiquette books, and physical examples found in museum collections, this study demonstrates that when examined in tandem it becomes apparent that stays and pockets served distinct, yet overlapping functions in women’s lives. They informed women’s relationships with their surrounding environments, strengthened women’s connection to the domestic realm, yet also gave women freedom to move outside the home and participate within the public sphere. Furthermore, both items also acted as private spaces, which allowed women to actively partake in romantic courtship and sexual flirtations in a gender appropriate way. By juxtaposing stays and pockets this study contributes to the growing historical discussion surrounding these items, but also begins to piece together a larger picture of the role undergarments, as a whole, played in women’s lives.
内衣的二分法:格鲁吉亚时期英国妇女的衣襟和口袋
约翰·科莱(John Collet)在1777年创作的版画《紧系鞋带,或时尚先于安逸》(Tight lace, or Fashion Before Ease)中,描绘了一个女人抓着一张床上的海报,她的女仆和丈夫正努力给她系紧腰带。同时,可以看到一个大的领带口袋挂在女人的腰上。尽管女性身上的衣襟和口袋是紧密相连的,但研究人员对它们进行了独立研究。这是可以理解的,因为乍一看,它们似乎是无与伦比的。紧身胸衣是19世纪紧身胸衣的前身,它们将身体塑造成理想的时尚形状。另一方面,口袋是实用的袋子,用来装必需品;它们与女性的衣服分开,用绳子系在腰上,藏在裙子下面。尽管最初存在差异,但这些服装并不是彼此独立运作的。通过使用漫画、礼仪书籍和博物馆藏品中的实物样本,这项研究表明,当把它们放在一起研究时,很明显,上衣和口袋在女性生活中扮演着截然不同的角色,但又有重叠的功能。它们为妇女与周围环境的关系提供了信息,加强了妇女与家庭领域的联系,同时也给了妇女走出家庭、参与公共领域的自由。此外,这两件物品也作为私人空间,允许女性以性别合适的方式积极参与浪漫的求爱和性调情。通过将内衣和口袋放在一起,这项研究有助于围绕这些物品进行越来越多的历史讨论,但也开始拼凑出一幅更大的画面,即内衣作为一个整体,在女性生活中所扮演的角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信