The Effect of Dialysis Solution Temperature and Stepwise Ultrafiltration Profile on Dialysis Adequacy and Pruritus in Hemodialysis Patients: A Quasi-experimental Study

Abdolhamid Jamshidzehi, F. Kiyani, Salahuddin Boya, H. Askari, Farshid Saeedinezhad
{"title":"The Effect of Dialysis Solution Temperature and Stepwise Ultrafiltration Profile on Dialysis Adequacy and Pruritus in Hemodialysis Patients: A Quasi-experimental Study","authors":"Abdolhamid Jamshidzehi, F. Kiyani, Salahuddin Boya, H. Askari, Farshid Saeedinezhad","doi":"10.5812/MSNJ.114664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patients with renal insufficiency who receive hemodialysis should be continuously monitored to avoid possible complications, as they are at increased risk of several problems, including pruritus, as one of the most annoying problems. It seems that dialysis adequacy affects the pruritus of hemodialysis patients. Objective: The current study aimed to investigate the effect of dialysis solution temperature and stepwise ultrafiltration profile on dialysis adequacy and pruritus of hemodialysis patients. Methods: Following a single group quasi-experimental design, 34 eligible hemodialysis patients admitted to the hemodialysis ward of Zahedan Medical Center (Iran) in 2020 were recruited using the convenience sampling technique. All patients attended three standard dialysis sessions (at a temperature of 37°C) and three cold dialysis sessions (36°C) with a stepwise dialysis ultrafiltration profile. Dialysis adequacy was measured at the end of each session, and Yosipovitch’s Pruritus Severity Scale (PSS) was filled before and after each dialysis session. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics (i.e., frequency, mean, and standard deviation). Mean scores before and after dialysis were paired by t-test using SPSS version 22. Statistical significance was considered when P-value < 0.05. Results: The mean and standard deviation of dialysis adequacy in both standard dialysis and cold dialysis techniques with stepwise ultrafiltration profile were 1.18 ± 0.36 and 1.44 ± 0.48, respectively, indicating that dialysis adequacy of the cold dialysis method with stepwise ultrafiltration profile was significantly higher (P = 0.001). Besides, the mean pruritus scores in the standard dialysis and cold dialysis methods with stepwise ultrafiltration profile were -0.73 ± 0.80 and -1.73 ± 1.16, respectively, showing a significant difference (P = 0.001). Conclusions: Cold hemodialysis with a stepwise ultrafiltration profile can be used as a simple and low-cost technique to improve both dialysis adequacy and relieve pruritus in hemodialysis patients.","PeriodicalId":18480,"journal":{"name":"Medical-Surgical Nursing Journal","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical-Surgical Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/MSNJ.114664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with renal insufficiency who receive hemodialysis should be continuously monitored to avoid possible complications, as they are at increased risk of several problems, including pruritus, as one of the most annoying problems. It seems that dialysis adequacy affects the pruritus of hemodialysis patients. Objective: The current study aimed to investigate the effect of dialysis solution temperature and stepwise ultrafiltration profile on dialysis adequacy and pruritus of hemodialysis patients. Methods: Following a single group quasi-experimental design, 34 eligible hemodialysis patients admitted to the hemodialysis ward of Zahedan Medical Center (Iran) in 2020 were recruited using the convenience sampling technique. All patients attended three standard dialysis sessions (at a temperature of 37°C) and three cold dialysis sessions (36°C) with a stepwise dialysis ultrafiltration profile. Dialysis adequacy was measured at the end of each session, and Yosipovitch’s Pruritus Severity Scale (PSS) was filled before and after each dialysis session. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics (i.e., frequency, mean, and standard deviation). Mean scores before and after dialysis were paired by t-test using SPSS version 22. Statistical significance was considered when P-value < 0.05. Results: The mean and standard deviation of dialysis adequacy in both standard dialysis and cold dialysis techniques with stepwise ultrafiltration profile were 1.18 ± 0.36 and 1.44 ± 0.48, respectively, indicating that dialysis adequacy of the cold dialysis method with stepwise ultrafiltration profile was significantly higher (P = 0.001). Besides, the mean pruritus scores in the standard dialysis and cold dialysis methods with stepwise ultrafiltration profile were -0.73 ± 0.80 and -1.73 ± 1.16, respectively, showing a significant difference (P = 0.001). Conclusions: Cold hemodialysis with a stepwise ultrafiltration profile can be used as a simple and low-cost technique to improve both dialysis adequacy and relieve pruritus in hemodialysis patients.
透析液温度和逐级超滤对血液透析患者透析充分性和瘙痒的影响:一项准实验研究
背景:接受血液透析的肾功能不全患者应持续监测以避免可能的并发症,因为他们有几种问题的风险增加,包括瘙痒,这是最令人烦恼的问题之一。似乎透析充分性影响血液透析患者的瘙痒。目的:探讨透析液温度和超滤分级对血液透析患者透析充分性和皮肤瘙痒的影响。方法:采用单组准实验设计,采用方便抽样技术,招募2020年在伊朗扎黑丹医疗中心血透病房就诊的34例符合条件的血液透析患者。所有患者都参加了三次标准透析(温度为37°C)和三次冷透析(36°C),并进行了逐步透析超滤。在每次透析结束时测量透析充分性,并在每次透析前后填写Yosipovitch瘙痒严重程度量表(PSS)。使用描述性统计(即频率、平均值和标准差)对数据进行汇总。采用SPSS 22对透析前后平均评分进行配对t检验。当p值< 0.05时,认为有统计学意义。结果:标准透析和逐步超滤冷透析方法的透析充分性的平均值和标准差分别为1.18±0.36和1.44±0.48,表明逐步超滤冷透析方法的透析充分性显著更高(P = 0.001)。标准透析法与冷透析法的瘙痒评分平均值分别为-0.73±0.80分和-1.73±1.16分,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.001)。结论:逐级超滤冷透技术可作为一种简单、低成本的技术,改善血液透析患者的透析充分性和缓解皮肤瘙痒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信