Retrospective evaluation of fiber-reinforced periodontal splints and resin bridges in the anterior region

IF 0.2 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
N. Ünlü, Nurdan Altınbilek, Mehmet Semih Velioğlu
{"title":"Retrospective evaluation of fiber-reinforced periodontal splints and resin bridges in the anterior region","authors":"N. Ünlü, Nurdan Altınbilek, Mehmet Semih Velioğlu","doi":"10.5577/INTDENTRES.2021.VOL11.SUPPL1.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of fiber-reinforced periodontal splints (FRSs) and adhesive bridges (FRBs) in treating anterior single-tooth defects. \nMethodology: Sixty-five patients who received FRSs and FRBs from 2001 to 2012 were recalled and evaluated clinically. The FRS and FRB restorations of the patients were clinically evaluated in terms of anatomical form, marginal adaptation, marginal coloration, secondary caries, and retention, according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. The current restoration statuses of the patients from 5 to 10 years post-treatment were photographed and recorded. Patient satisfaction level was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS), and periodontal pocket depth was measured. Clinical follow-up data were obtained and analyzed with the Chi-squared test (p<0.05). \nResults: When each of the modified USPHS criteria was compared with the baseline values, statistically significant differences were observed between the groups. There were statistically significant differences when the categories were evaluated according to initial values (p<0.05). When the clinical evaluation criteria were compared with each other, no statistically significant differences were found (p>0.05). While the most successful results were obtained in the FRB group, most of the restoration losses and repairs occurred in the FRS group. According to the data obtained, 38% of restorations were lost and all restorations had been intact for at least 5 years. All lost restorations were in FGS restorations. The recall rate was 49% (n=32). Twenty (62.5%) of 32 patients rated their satisfaction with the restorations as being between 90 and 100, 8 (25%) as being between 80 and 90, and 4 (12.5%) as being between 70 and 80 on the VAS scale. The pocket depths of the patients at 5- and 10-years post-restoration were 2.3–3.8 mm and 2.4–5.2 mm, respectively. \nConclusion: Fiber-reinforced restorations performed due to the loss of anterior single teeth and periodontal tissue can serve patients clinically for at least 5 years. FGK and FGS restorations can be considered alternative treatments that can further delay the more expensive implant and prosthetic treatment options for years. \n  \nHow to cite this article: Ünlü N, Altınbilek N, Velioğlu MS. Retrospective evaluation of fiber-reinforced periodontal splints and resin bridges in the anterior region. Int Dent Res 2021;11(Suppl.1):122-7. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.suppl1.19 \n  \nLinguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.","PeriodicalId":31322,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5577/INTDENTRES.2021.VOL11.SUPPL1.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of fiber-reinforced periodontal splints (FRSs) and adhesive bridges (FRBs) in treating anterior single-tooth defects. Methodology: Sixty-five patients who received FRSs and FRBs from 2001 to 2012 were recalled and evaluated clinically. The FRS and FRB restorations of the patients were clinically evaluated in terms of anatomical form, marginal adaptation, marginal coloration, secondary caries, and retention, according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. The current restoration statuses of the patients from 5 to 10 years post-treatment were photographed and recorded. Patient satisfaction level was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS), and periodontal pocket depth was measured. Clinical follow-up data were obtained and analyzed with the Chi-squared test (p<0.05). Results: When each of the modified USPHS criteria was compared with the baseline values, statistically significant differences were observed between the groups. There were statistically significant differences when the categories were evaluated according to initial values (p<0.05). When the clinical evaluation criteria were compared with each other, no statistically significant differences were found (p>0.05). While the most successful results were obtained in the FRB group, most of the restoration losses and repairs occurred in the FRS group. According to the data obtained, 38% of restorations were lost and all restorations had been intact for at least 5 years. All lost restorations were in FGS restorations. The recall rate was 49% (n=32). Twenty (62.5%) of 32 patients rated their satisfaction with the restorations as being between 90 and 100, 8 (25%) as being between 80 and 90, and 4 (12.5%) as being between 70 and 80 on the VAS scale. The pocket depths of the patients at 5- and 10-years post-restoration were 2.3–3.8 mm and 2.4–5.2 mm, respectively. Conclusion: Fiber-reinforced restorations performed due to the loss of anterior single teeth and periodontal tissue can serve patients clinically for at least 5 years. FGK and FGS restorations can be considered alternative treatments that can further delay the more expensive implant and prosthetic treatment options for years.   How to cite this article: Ünlü N, Altınbilek N, Velioğlu MS. Retrospective evaluation of fiber-reinforced periodontal splints and resin bridges in the anterior region. Int Dent Res 2021;11(Suppl.1):122-7. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.suppl1.19   Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.
纤维增强牙周夹板和树脂桥在前牙区的回顾性评价
目的:评价纤维增强牙周夹板(FRSs)和粘接桥(FRBs)治疗前牙单牙缺损的临床效果。方法:回顾性分析2001 ~ 2012年接受frs和frb治疗的65例患者,并进行临床评价。根据修改后的美国公共卫生服务(USPHS)标准,对患者的FRS和FRB修复体的解剖形态、边缘适应、边缘着色、继发龋和固位进行临床评估。对患者治疗后5 ~ 10年的恢复现状进行拍照和记录。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估患者满意度,并测量牙周袋深度。获得临床随访资料,采用卡方检验(p0.05)进行分析。虽然在FRB组获得了最成功的结果,但大多数修复损失和修复发生在FRS组。根据获得的数据,38%的修复体丢失,所有修复体完好无损至少5年。所有丢失的修复都在FGS修复中。召回率为49% (n=32)。在32名患者中,20名(62.5%)患者对修复体的满意度在90 - 100分之间,8名(25%)患者在80 - 90分之间,4名(12.5%)患者在70 - 80分之间。患者修复后5年和10年的袋深分别为2.3 ~ 3.8 mm和2.4 ~ 5.2 mm。结论:因前单牙及牙周组织缺失而行纤维增强修复的患者临床至少可使用5年。FGK和FGS修复体可以被认为是替代治疗方法,可以进一步推迟更昂贵的种植体和假体治疗选择数年。本文来源:Ünlü N, Altınbilek N, Velioğlu MS.纤维增强牙周夹板和树脂桥在前牙区的回顾性评价。国际医学杂志,2021;11(增刊1):122-7。https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.suppl1.19语言修改:本手稿中的英语已由至少两名专业编辑检查,他们都是英语母语者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信