Ardy Setiawan, Juanita A. Gunawan, Selviana Wulansari, Didi Nugroho
{"title":"Effect of Nanofilled Resin-Based Coating on the Compressive Strength of Glass Ionomer Cement – in vitro","authors":"Ardy Setiawan, Juanita A. Gunawan, Selviana Wulansari, Didi Nugroho","doi":"10.22146/majkedgiind.65512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Glass ionomer cement as one of the restoration materials requires high compressive strength so it can last during functional activity. The latest glass ionomer cement comes with glass hybrid technology and a nanofilled resin-based protective coating which is said to increase the compressive strength of glass ionomer cement. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of nanofilled resin-based coating and the types of glass ionomer cement materials on their compressive strength. Two types of commercial glass ionomer cement material were used; conventional (Fuji IX GP Extra), and hybrid (EQUIA Forte Fill) glass ionomer cement. Forty cylindrical (4 x 6 mm) samples were prepared in each group. The main group was divided into 4 subgroups (n=10) based on the protective coating used (EQUIA Forte Coat, Varnish, Control, Water + EQUIA Forte Coat). Eight subgroups were immersed in 37 °C distilled water for 7 days, then a compressive strength test was performed using a universal testing machine. The data analysis showed no significant difference in the compressive strength between the two types of glass ionomer cement materials (p>0.05). The use of a protective coating was associated with a significant decrease in the compressive strength (p<0.05). The use of glass ionomer cement without the application of a protective coating was considered to be quite good because the compressive strength value of the restoration still met the standards of the American Dental Association.","PeriodicalId":31262,"journal":{"name":"Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/majkedgiind.65512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Glass ionomer cement as one of the restoration materials requires high compressive strength so it can last during functional activity. The latest glass ionomer cement comes with glass hybrid technology and a nanofilled resin-based protective coating which is said to increase the compressive strength of glass ionomer cement. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of nanofilled resin-based coating and the types of glass ionomer cement materials on their compressive strength. Two types of commercial glass ionomer cement material were used; conventional (Fuji IX GP Extra), and hybrid (EQUIA Forte Fill) glass ionomer cement. Forty cylindrical (4 x 6 mm) samples were prepared in each group. The main group was divided into 4 subgroups (n=10) based on the protective coating used (EQUIA Forte Coat, Varnish, Control, Water + EQUIA Forte Coat). Eight subgroups were immersed in 37 °C distilled water for 7 days, then a compressive strength test was performed using a universal testing machine. The data analysis showed no significant difference in the compressive strength between the two types of glass ionomer cement materials (p>0.05). The use of a protective coating was associated with a significant decrease in the compressive strength (p<0.05). The use of glass ionomer cement without the application of a protective coating was considered to be quite good because the compressive strength value of the restoration still met the standards of the American Dental Association.
玻璃离子水门合剂作为一种修复材料,要求具有较高的抗压强度,以保证其在功能活动中持续存在。最新的玻璃离子水泥采用了玻璃混合技术和纳米填充树脂基保护涂层,据说可以提高玻璃离子水泥的抗压强度。本研究的目的是分析纳米填充树脂基涂层和玻璃离子水泥材料的类型对其抗压强度的影响。采用了两种商用玻璃离子水泥材料;常规(Fuji IX GP Extra)和混合(EQUIA Forte Fill)玻璃离子水泥。每组制备40个圆柱形(4 × 6 mm)样品。根据使用的保护涂层(EQUIA Forte Coat, Varnish, Control, Water + EQUIA Forte Coat)将主组分为4个亚组(n=10)。8个亚组在37℃蒸馏水中浸泡7天,然后使用万能试验机进行抗压强度试验。数据分析显示,两种玻璃离子水门汀材料抗压强度差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。防护涂层的使用与抗压强度的显著降低相关(p<0.05)。使用玻璃离聚体水泥而不使用保护涂层被认为是相当好的,因为修复的抗压强度值仍然符合美国牙科协会的标准。