A Disciplined Freedom: The Paradox of Labour Rights in Post-Reformasi Indonesia

R. Azhiim, Gema Ramadhan Bastari
{"title":"A Disciplined Freedom: The Paradox of Labour Rights in Post-Reformasi Indonesia","authors":"R. Azhiim, Gema Ramadhan Bastari","doi":"10.22146/PCD.36026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper will discuss the paradox of labour rights in Indonesia after the beginning of Reformasi in 1998. Despite workers having been provided with better regulations that uphold all of their essential rights, labour protests remain prevalent with the same demands every year. To explain this paradox, this paper will employ Foucault's concept of biopower to argue, that instead of bringing prosperity to workers, these new regulations have actually disciplined them. New regulations and freedoms have dictated and limited the kinds of actions that workers can undertake, constructing their logic and becoming internalised to the point that some do not realise that they are ironically being constrained by the very laws that were supposed to free them. As such, workers have unknowingly become trapped in a cycle of protest–new government policy–protest ad infinitum. This paper concludes that \"Reformasi\" has not done much to improve workers' prosperity. The Manpower Law and freedom of association have failed to guarantee the fulfilment of labour rights, instead giving a false sense of freedom. To escape this trap, the labour movement must find a way to fight outside of the logic provided by the Manpower Law by beginning to imagine a system where labour exploitation can no longer exist.","PeriodicalId":32712,"journal":{"name":"PCD Online Journal","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PCD Online Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/PCD.36026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

This paper will discuss the paradox of labour rights in Indonesia after the beginning of Reformasi in 1998. Despite workers having been provided with better regulations that uphold all of their essential rights, labour protests remain prevalent with the same demands every year. To explain this paradox, this paper will employ Foucault's concept of biopower to argue, that instead of bringing prosperity to workers, these new regulations have actually disciplined them. New regulations and freedoms have dictated and limited the kinds of actions that workers can undertake, constructing their logic and becoming internalised to the point that some do not realise that they are ironically being constrained by the very laws that were supposed to free them. As such, workers have unknowingly become trapped in a cycle of protest–new government policy–protest ad infinitum. This paper concludes that "Reformasi" has not done much to improve workers' prosperity. The Manpower Law and freedom of association have failed to guarantee the fulfilment of labour rights, instead giving a false sense of freedom. To escape this trap, the labour movement must find a way to fight outside of the logic provided by the Manpower Law by beginning to imagine a system where labour exploitation can no longer exist.
有纪律的自由:改革后印尼劳工权利的悖论
本文将讨论1998年印尼改革开始后劳工权利的悖论。尽管为工人提供了维护其所有基本权利的更好的法规,但劳工抗议仍然普遍存在,每年都提出同样的要求。为了解释这一悖论,本文将运用福柯的生物权力概念来论证,这些新的法规并没有给工人带来繁荣,反而约束了他们。新的法规和自由规定并限制了工人可以采取的各种行动,构建了他们的逻辑,并变得内化,以至于一些人没有意识到,具有讽刺意味的是,他们受到了本应使他们自由的法律的约束。因此,工人们不知不觉地陷入了抗议-新政府政策-抗议的循环中。本文的结论是,“改革”对提高工人的富裕程度没有多大作用。《人力法》和结社自由并没有保障劳工权利的实现,反而给人一种虚假的自由感。为了摆脱这个陷阱,劳工运动必须找到一种方法,在《人力法》提供的逻辑之外进行斗争,开始想象一种不再存在劳动剥削的制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信