{"title":"Early New Testament Manuscripts and Their Dates A Critique of Theological Palaeography","authors":"P. Orsini, W. Clarysse","doi":"10.2143/ETL.88.4.2957937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"— The date of the earliest New Testament papyri is nearly always based on palaeographical criteria. A consensus among papyrologists, palaeographers and New Testament scholars is presented in the edition of NESTLE–ALAND, 1994. In the last twenty years several New Testament scholars (THIEDE, COMFORT–BARRETT, 1999, 2001 and JAROS, 2006) have argued for an earlier date of most of these texts. The present article analyzes the date of the earliest New Testament papyri on the basis of comparative palaeography and a clear distinction between different types of literary scripts. There are no first-century New Testament papyri and only very few papyri can be attributed to the (second half of the) second century. It is only in the third and fourth centuries that New Testament manuscripts become more common, but here too the dates proposed by COMFORT–BARRETT, 1999, 2001, and JAROS, 2006 are often too early. 96013_ETL_2012-4_07.indd 467 29/01/13 14:25 468 P. ORSINI – W. CLARYSSE","PeriodicalId":42509,"journal":{"name":"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses","volume":"118 1","pages":"443-474"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"43","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/ETL.88.4.2957937","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43
Abstract
— The date of the earliest New Testament papyri is nearly always based on palaeographical criteria. A consensus among papyrologists, palaeographers and New Testament scholars is presented in the edition of NESTLE–ALAND, 1994. In the last twenty years several New Testament scholars (THIEDE, COMFORT–BARRETT, 1999, 2001 and JAROS, 2006) have argued for an earlier date of most of these texts. The present article analyzes the date of the earliest New Testament papyri on the basis of comparative palaeography and a clear distinction between different types of literary scripts. There are no first-century New Testament papyri and only very few papyri can be attributed to the (second half of the) second century. It is only in the third and fourth centuries that New Testament manuscripts become more common, but here too the dates proposed by COMFORT–BARRETT, 1999, 2001, and JAROS, 2006 are often too early. 96013_ETL_2012-4_07.indd 467 29/01/13 14:25 468 P. ORSINI – W. CLARYSSE
-最早的新约莎草纸的日期几乎总是基于古地学标准。纸莎草学家、古抄写家和新约学者之间的共识在雀巢-奥兰1994年版中提出。在过去的二十年里,一些新约学者(THIEDE, COMFORT-BARRETT, 1999,2001和JAROS, 2006)认为这些文本的日期更早。本文在比较古学和明确区分不同类型的文学手稿的基础上,分析了最早的新约莎草纸的日期。没有第一世纪的新约莎草纸,只有很少的莎草纸可以归因于第二世纪(下半叶)。直到第三和第四世纪,新约手抄本才变得更加普遍,但是COMFORT-BARRETT(1999年、2001年)和JAROS(2006年)提出的日期也往往太早了。96013 _etl_2012-4_07。2013年1月29日:468 P. ORSINI - W. CLARYSSE
期刊介绍:
Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses (ETL), founded in 1924, is a quarterly publication by professors of Theology and Canon Law at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and the Université catholique de Louvain (Louvain-la-Neuve). Each volume totals ca. 1300 pages. Issues 1 (April) and 4 (December) contain articles, book reviews and chronicles in various languages (English, French, German). Issue 2-3 (September) represents the annual Elenchus Bibliographicus, an extensive bibliography of books and articles that appeared during the preceding year. The bibliography (ca. 15,000 entries) covers the entire field of Theology and Canon Law: History of Theology, History of Religions.