The Essential Role of Integrating Technology Content and Skills into University Principal Preparation Programs

Q4 Social Sciences
R. Moody, K. Dale, M. Slattery, R. Wieland
{"title":"The Essential Role of Integrating Technology Content and Skills into University Principal Preparation Programs","authors":"R. Moody, K. Dale, M. Slattery, R. Wieland","doi":"10.35608/RURALED.V29I1.940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Just-in-time\" delivery of goods and services was the call to action phrase of the 1990's, but in the 21st Century, just-in-time is too late. University leaders in principal preparation programs must not only respond to the call of the field, but also anticipate the needs even before school administrators recognize the content and skills necessary with which to lead. As building principals become increasingly accountable for integrating technology into instruction and infrastructure, principal preparation programs are more accountable to prepare principals to succeed in their leadership roles, acknowledge the impact of principals on student achievement and teacher performance, and accept our responsibility to reinvent preparation programs instead of just reforming them. Understanding the critical need for highly qualified administrators, today's preparation programs must contain essential technology content, be flexible and individualized, infused with real-world problem solving, based on current research, provide access through alternative delivery modes, and focus on state and national leadership standards. In the fall of 2004 the educational administration program faculty at Fort Hays State University (FHSU) embraced the call to action and began an extensive review of our principal preparation program. The resulting review of the literature and a program redesign sought to address me changing needs of prospective principals enrolled in our program. FHSU faculty considered the research that identified the principal as having an indirect positive impact on student learning through influencing the teacher (Quinn 2002). Faculty asked themselves what principals should know and be able to do in technology in light of the research that stated, \"The teacher is a key variable in technology implementation and effectiveness. Technology's impact on teachers and their practice should be considered as important as student effects, for students move on, but teachers remain to influence many generations of students\" (NCREL, p. 1). Although the redesign of the FHSU principal preparation program encompassed much more than technology, it was a key component of preparing our candidates adequately and helping them influence student achievement. This dedication to technology in the principal preparation program at FHSU is especially important when faculty considered the research finding of Kulik, Waxman, Connell, and Gray that identified technology, when used appropriately, as improving education in the effect-size range of between 0.30 and 0.40 (Valdez, 2004). The NCREL online document was a Critical Issue posting that was researched and written by Gilbert Valdez, Ph.D., senior advisor for technology and co-director of the North Central Eisenhower Mathematics and Science Consortium at Learning Point Associates. Research Questions In order to reinvent a program that reflected our program mission and core values of teaching and coaching ethical leaders of learning, the following research questions were asked: 1. How will we effectively teach and coach ethical leaders of learning so they are successful in leading, inspiring, and influencing students and teachers in the school? 2. What technology content and skills do our faculty and principal candidates need to know and be able to do, and how do we integrate die technology content and skills into the new program? This article examines current educational leadership literature, explains the methodology and model used to \"reinvent\" the FHSU Educational Administration program, and addresses the action steps taken to transform a traditional university program into a technology-rich principal preparation program, which helps new administrators better serve their teachers and students. Review of the Literature In reviewing current literature, the FHSU education administration faculty focused on connecting theory and action to transform a 30-year-old traditional principal preparation program. …","PeriodicalId":33740,"journal":{"name":"The Rural Educator","volume":"5 1","pages":"42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Rural Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35608/RURALED.V29I1.940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"Just-in-time" delivery of goods and services was the call to action phrase of the 1990's, but in the 21st Century, just-in-time is too late. University leaders in principal preparation programs must not only respond to the call of the field, but also anticipate the needs even before school administrators recognize the content and skills necessary with which to lead. As building principals become increasingly accountable for integrating technology into instruction and infrastructure, principal preparation programs are more accountable to prepare principals to succeed in their leadership roles, acknowledge the impact of principals on student achievement and teacher performance, and accept our responsibility to reinvent preparation programs instead of just reforming them. Understanding the critical need for highly qualified administrators, today's preparation programs must contain essential technology content, be flexible and individualized, infused with real-world problem solving, based on current research, provide access through alternative delivery modes, and focus on state and national leadership standards. In the fall of 2004 the educational administration program faculty at Fort Hays State University (FHSU) embraced the call to action and began an extensive review of our principal preparation program. The resulting review of the literature and a program redesign sought to address me changing needs of prospective principals enrolled in our program. FHSU faculty considered the research that identified the principal as having an indirect positive impact on student learning through influencing the teacher (Quinn 2002). Faculty asked themselves what principals should know and be able to do in technology in light of the research that stated, "The teacher is a key variable in technology implementation and effectiveness. Technology's impact on teachers and their practice should be considered as important as student effects, for students move on, but teachers remain to influence many generations of students" (NCREL, p. 1). Although the redesign of the FHSU principal preparation program encompassed much more than technology, it was a key component of preparing our candidates adequately and helping them influence student achievement. This dedication to technology in the principal preparation program at FHSU is especially important when faculty considered the research finding of Kulik, Waxman, Connell, and Gray that identified technology, when used appropriately, as improving education in the effect-size range of between 0.30 and 0.40 (Valdez, 2004). The NCREL online document was a Critical Issue posting that was researched and written by Gilbert Valdez, Ph.D., senior advisor for technology and co-director of the North Central Eisenhower Mathematics and Science Consortium at Learning Point Associates. Research Questions In order to reinvent a program that reflected our program mission and core values of teaching and coaching ethical leaders of learning, the following research questions were asked: 1. How will we effectively teach and coach ethical leaders of learning so they are successful in leading, inspiring, and influencing students and teachers in the school? 2. What technology content and skills do our faculty and principal candidates need to know and be able to do, and how do we integrate die technology content and skills into the new program? This article examines current educational leadership literature, explains the methodology and model used to "reinvent" the FHSU Educational Administration program, and addresses the action steps taken to transform a traditional university program into a technology-rich principal preparation program, which helps new administrators better serve their teachers and students. Review of the Literature In reviewing current literature, the FHSU education administration faculty focused on connecting theory and action to transform a 30-year-old traditional principal preparation program. …
将技术内容和技能整合到大学校长预备课程中的重要作用
“及时”交付商品和服务是20世纪90年代的行动口号,但在21世纪,“及时”已经太晚了。校长准备项目的大学领导不仅要对该领域的要求做出反应,还要在学校管理人员认识到领导所需的内容和技能之前就预测到需求。随着校长越来越有责任将技术融入教学和基础设施,校长准备项目更有责任让校长做好领导角色的准备,承认校长对学生成绩和教师表现的影响,并接受我们重塑准备项目的责任,而不仅仅是改革它们。了解对高素质管理人员的迫切需求,今天的准备课程必须包含基本的技术内容,灵活和个性化,融入现实世界的问题解决方案,以当前的研究为基础,通过替代交付模式提供访问,并关注州和国家领导标准。2004年秋天,海斯堡州立大学(FHSU)的教育管理项目教师响应号召,开始对我们的校长准备项目进行广泛的审查。通过对文献的回顾和对项目的重新设计,我们试图满足参加我们项目的潜在校长不断变化的需求。FHSU的教师认为,研究表明校长通过影响教师对学生的学习产生间接的积极影响(Quinn 2002)。教师们问他们自己,根据一项研究,“教师是技术实施和有效性的关键变量”,校长应该了解和能够做些什么。技术对教师及其实践的影响应被视为与学生影响一样重要,因为学生会继续前进,但教师仍然会影响许多代学生”(NCREL,第1页)。尽管重新设计FHSU校长准备计划所包含的内容远远超过技术,但它是充分准备我们的候选人并帮助他们影响学生成绩的关键组成部分。当教师们考虑到Kulik、Waxman、Connell和Gray的研究发现时,这种对技术的奉献在FHSU的主要准备项目中尤为重要,他们认为,如果使用得当,技术可以在0.30到0.40之间的效应量范围内改善教育(Valdez, 2004)。NCREL的在线文件是由Gilbert Valdez博士研究和撰写的关键问题帖子,他是学习点协会中北部艾森豪威尔数学和科学联盟的高级技术顾问和联合主任。为了重塑一个项目,以反映我们的项目使命和教学的核心价值,并指导学习的道德领袖,以下研究问题被问到:1。我们如何有效地教导和指导道德领袖,使他们能够成功地领导、激励和影响学校的学生和教师?2. 我们的教师和主要候选人需要了解和能够掌握哪些技术内容和技能,我们如何将模具技术内容和技能整合到新项目中?本文考察了当前的教育领导文献,解释了用于“重塑”FHSU教育管理计划的方法和模型,并阐述了将传统大学计划转变为技术丰富的校长准备计划所采取的行动步骤,这有助于新管理者更好地为教师和学生服务。在回顾现有文献的过程中,FHSU的教育管理人员专注于将理论与行动联系起来,以改变一个有30年历史的传统校长准备项目。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Rural Educator
The Rural Educator Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信