Comparison of outcome between traditional open haemorrhoidectomy and stapled haemorrhoidectomy operation

Farjana Haque Shumi, Md Omar Ali, Md. Akram Hossain
{"title":"Comparison of outcome between traditional open haemorrhoidectomy and stapled haemorrhoidectomy operation","authors":"Farjana Haque Shumi, Md Omar Ali, Md. Akram Hossain","doi":"10.3329/jss.v21i2.43917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Haemorrhoidectomy is a surgical excision and removal of the hemorrhoid used primarily only in severe cases. There are many different types of haemorrhoidectomy like open haemorrhoidectomy and stapled haemorrhoidectomy. \nObjective: To compare the outcome of stapled haemorrhoidectomy and traditional open haemorrhoidectomy. Methods: This is a cross sectional study of 72 cases who underwent open and stapled haemorrhoidectomy operation for symptomatic 2nd, 3rd and 4th degree hemorrhoids. Binomial probability pre-posttest were used for statistical analysis, p value less than 0.05 was taken as significant. \nResults: : Among 72 patients, 34 patients of conventional haemorrhoidectomy and 38 of stapled haemorrhoidectomy at 3 months post-surgery in conventional group 1 patient was unsatisfied, 12 patients were satisfied and 4 patients stated their condition good. In stapled group 14 patients stated their condition excellent and 5 patients stated their condition good. Statistical analysis shows that level of satisfaction at 3 months post-surgery in conventional group and stapled group was statistically significant(p-value<.001). \nConclusion: Stapled haemorrhoidectomy is a relatively new procedure. Stapled haemorrhoidectomy is a safe procedure, less pain and disabled than the conventional haemorrhoidectomy. \nJournal of Surgical Sciences (2017) Vol. 21 (2): 99-104","PeriodicalId":33248,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Sciences","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jss.v21i2.43917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Haemorrhoidectomy is a surgical excision and removal of the hemorrhoid used primarily only in severe cases. There are many different types of haemorrhoidectomy like open haemorrhoidectomy and stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Objective: To compare the outcome of stapled haemorrhoidectomy and traditional open haemorrhoidectomy. Methods: This is a cross sectional study of 72 cases who underwent open and stapled haemorrhoidectomy operation for symptomatic 2nd, 3rd and 4th degree hemorrhoids. Binomial probability pre-posttest were used for statistical analysis, p value less than 0.05 was taken as significant. Results: : Among 72 patients, 34 patients of conventional haemorrhoidectomy and 38 of stapled haemorrhoidectomy at 3 months post-surgery in conventional group 1 patient was unsatisfied, 12 patients were satisfied and 4 patients stated their condition good. In stapled group 14 patients stated their condition excellent and 5 patients stated their condition good. Statistical analysis shows that level of satisfaction at 3 months post-surgery in conventional group and stapled group was statistically significant(p-value<.001). Conclusion: Stapled haemorrhoidectomy is a relatively new procedure. Stapled haemorrhoidectomy is a safe procedure, less pain and disabled than the conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Journal of Surgical Sciences (2017) Vol. 21 (2): 99-104
传统切开痔切除术与缝合痔切除术疗效比较
背景:痔疮切除术是一种主要用于严重病例的手术切除和移除痔疮。有许多不同类型的痔疮切除术,如开放式痔疮切除术和缝合式痔疮切除术。目的:比较缝合痔切除术与传统切开痔切除术的疗效。方法:对72例有症状的二度、三度和四度痔疮行切开和缝合痔切除术的患者进行横断面研究。采用二项概率前后检验进行统计学分析,以p值< 0.05为显著性。结果:72例患者中,常规组术后3个月常规痔切除术34例,缝合痔切除术38例,不满意1例,满意12例,良好4例。缝合组14例表现良好,5例表现良好。统计分析显示,常规组与钉书钉组术后3个月满意度差异有统计学意义(p值< 0.001)。结论:痔钉切除术是一种较新的手术方法。吻合器痔切除术是一种安全的手术,比传统的痔切除术疼痛和残疾更少。外科杂志(2017)Vol. 21 (2): 99-104
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信