Perceived Legibility and Aesthetic Pleasingness of Light and Ultralight Fonts

T. Zlokazova, Ivan Burmistrov
{"title":"Perceived Legibility and Aesthetic Pleasingness of Light and Ultralight Fonts","authors":"T. Zlokazova, Ivan Burmistrov","doi":"10.1145/3121283.3121296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last five years the use of light and ultralight fonts has become the new norm in the user interface design of most digital products. Our previous research, based on performance measures, showed that lightweight fonts have negative effects on text legibility and cognitive load when performing word search tasks. However, objective data and subjective perceptions of legibility and aesthetic appeal of fonts do not always correspond. In this paper we present the results of a subjective evaluation study of four variations of the Helvetica Neue typeface (ultralight, light, normal and bold) presented with high vs. low contrast and positive vs. negative polarity. 63 subjects volunteered in a pairwise comparison survey aimed at evaluating the preferences of respondents with regard to perceived legibility and aesthetic pleasingness of sixteen combinations of font weight, contrast and polarity. The results suggest that users of different ages evaluate the legibility of ultralight font as being very low, but younger users may perceive ultralight fonts as more aesthetically appealing than do older users. Based on our study, we provide recommendations on the use of lightweight fonts in user interface design.","PeriodicalId":93284,"journal":{"name":"ECCE ... : proceedings of the ... European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ECCE ... : proceedings of the ... European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3121283.3121296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the last five years the use of light and ultralight fonts has become the new norm in the user interface design of most digital products. Our previous research, based on performance measures, showed that lightweight fonts have negative effects on text legibility and cognitive load when performing word search tasks. However, objective data and subjective perceptions of legibility and aesthetic appeal of fonts do not always correspond. In this paper we present the results of a subjective evaluation study of four variations of the Helvetica Neue typeface (ultralight, light, normal and bold) presented with high vs. low contrast and positive vs. negative polarity. 63 subjects volunteered in a pairwise comparison survey aimed at evaluating the preferences of respondents with regard to perceived legibility and aesthetic pleasingness of sixteen combinations of font weight, contrast and polarity. The results suggest that users of different ages evaluate the legibility of ultralight font as being very low, but younger users may perceive ultralight fonts as more aesthetically appealing than do older users. Based on our study, we provide recommendations on the use of lightweight fonts in user interface design.
轻字体和超轻字体的易读性和审美愉悦感
在过去的五年中,使用轻字体和超轻字体已经成为大多数数字产品用户界面设计的新规范。我们之前的研究基于性能测量,表明轻量级字体在执行单词搜索任务时对文本的易读性和认知负荷有负面影响。然而,客观数据和主观感知的易读性和审美吸引力的字体并不总是对应的。在本文中,我们提出了对Helvetica Neue字体(超轻、轻、正常和粗体)的四种变体进行主观评估研究的结果,这些变体具有高对比度与低对比度以及正极性与负极性。63名受试者自愿参加了一项两两比较调查,旨在评估受访者对16种字体粗细、对比度和极性组合的易读性和审美愉悦度的偏好。结果表明,不同年龄的用户对超轻字体的易读性评价非常低,但年轻用户可能认为超轻字体比年长用户更具审美吸引力。基于我们的研究,我们提出了在用户界面设计中使用轻量级字体的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信