Early Versus Late Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients With Underlying Sinus Node Dysfunction

Muhammad Umer Butt, N. Okumus, A. Jabri, Charles L Thomas, Y. Tarabichi, Saima Karim
{"title":"Early Versus Late Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients With Underlying Sinus Node Dysfunction","authors":"Muhammad Umer Butt, N. Okumus, A. Jabri, Charles L Thomas, Y. Tarabichi, Saima Karim","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.121.023333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with anatomical and electrical remodeling. Some patients with AF have concomitant sick sinus syndrome and may need permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. Association between catheter ablation of AF timing and need for PPM in sick sinus syndrome has not been assessed. Methods and Results We used pooled electronic health data to perform retrospective cross‐sectional analysis of 66, 595 patients with AF and sick sinus syndrome to assess the need of PPM implantation temporally, with AF performed divided into earlier within 5 years (group 1), 5 to 10 years (group 2), or beyond 10 years (group 3) of diagnosis. PPM implantation was lowest among those who had catheter ablation within 5 years of sick sinus syndrome diagnosis: group 1 versus group 2 (18.15% versus 27.21%) and group 1 versus group 3 (18.15% versus 27.22%). Interestingly, there was no difference in risk of PPM between group 2 and group 3 (27.21% versus 27.22%; odds ratio [OR], 1.00 [95% CI, 0.85–1.20]). Conclusions Even after controlling known risk factors that increase the need for pacemaker implantation, timing of AF ablation was the strongest predictor for need for PPM. Patients adjusted OR of PPM was lower if patients had catheter ablation within 5 years of diagnosis compared with later than 5 years (adjusted OR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.59–0.70]).","PeriodicalId":17189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.023333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with anatomical and electrical remodeling. Some patients with AF have concomitant sick sinus syndrome and may need permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. Association between catheter ablation of AF timing and need for PPM in sick sinus syndrome has not been assessed. Methods and Results We used pooled electronic health data to perform retrospective cross‐sectional analysis of 66, 595 patients with AF and sick sinus syndrome to assess the need of PPM implantation temporally, with AF performed divided into earlier within 5 years (group 1), 5 to 10 years (group 2), or beyond 10 years (group 3) of diagnosis. PPM implantation was lowest among those who had catheter ablation within 5 years of sick sinus syndrome diagnosis: group 1 versus group 2 (18.15% versus 27.21%) and group 1 versus group 3 (18.15% versus 27.22%). Interestingly, there was no difference in risk of PPM between group 2 and group 3 (27.21% versus 27.22%; odds ratio [OR], 1.00 [95% CI, 0.85–1.20]). Conclusions Even after controlling known risk factors that increase the need for pacemaker implantation, timing of AF ablation was the strongest predictor for need for PPM. Patients adjusted OR of PPM was lower if patients had catheter ablation within 5 years of diagnosis compared with later than 5 years (adjusted OR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.59–0.70]).
房颤早期与晚期导管消融与潜在窦房结功能障碍患者永久起搏器植入的风险
背景房颤(AF)与解剖和电重构有关。有些房颤患者伴有病窦综合征,可能需要植入永久性起搏器(PPM)。病窦综合征患者心房颤动时间导管消融与PPM需求之间的关系尚未得到评估。方法和结果我们使用汇总的电子健康数据对66,595例房颤合并病窦综合征患者进行回顾性横断面分析,以评估暂时植入PPM的必要性,将房颤患者分为诊断前5年(1组)、5至10年(2组)或10年以上(3组)。在诊断为病窦综合征的5年内行导管消融的患者中,PPM植入术的发生率最低:1组比2组(18.15%比27.21%),1组比3组(18.15%比27.22%)。有趣的是,2组和3组之间的PPM风险没有差异(27.21%对27.22%;优势比[OR], 1.00 [95% CI, 0.85-1.20])。结论:即使在控制了已知的增加起搏器植入需求的危险因素后,房颤消融时间仍是PPM需求的最强预测因子。诊断5年内行导管消融的患者校正OR低于诊断5年后的患者(校正OR为0.64 [95% CI, 0.59-0.70])。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信