Utilization and Perception of Telemedicine in Indonesia: Healthcare Providers Point of View

Silvalena Silvalena, Rizma Adlia Syakurah
{"title":"Utilization and Perception of Telemedicine in Indonesia: Healthcare Providers Point of View","authors":"Silvalena Silvalena, Rizma Adlia Syakurah","doi":"10.24893/jkma.v16i1.1044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The popularity of Telemedicine nowadays has started to bloom and increasingly becoming accepted practice in Indonesia. However, it is still vague whether the available telemedicine platforms in Indonesia have already met the standards and needs of the users. This study aimed to evaluate the utilization and perception of telemedicine users from the perspective of healthcare providers. One hundred and eighteen responses were gathered to see healthcare providers' point of view on the telemedicine platform they used using a social-media broadcasted questionnaire. This questionnaire was adapted from the mHealth Application Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ) to see healthcare providers' points of view on the telemedicine platform they used. Data obtained from 16th - 29th June 2020 were analyzed descriptively then presented in a distribution table. Four telemedicine platforms mainly used were Alodokter, Halodoc, Mobile JKN, and Hospital-linked Telemedicine. Three-forth of respondents stated that they used the telemedicine platform due to the flexible working hours (75.4%), as an alternative during the pandemic and easy to use (71.2%), widespread in the society (50.8%), and most healthcare services have consultation sessions (93.2%). The majority of respondents prioritized doctor-patient communication during practice (89.0%). SehatPedia had the highest average score among platforms users. Majority of healthcare providers feel the benefits of using telemedicine. The quality of healthcare service served by healthcare providers does not diminish compared to in-person healthcare service, and that Telemedicine should further be developed.","PeriodicalId":55665,"journal":{"name":"JKMA Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Andalas Andalas Journal of Public Health","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JKMA Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Andalas Andalas Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24893/jkma.v16i1.1044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The popularity of Telemedicine nowadays has started to bloom and increasingly becoming accepted practice in Indonesia. However, it is still vague whether the available telemedicine platforms in Indonesia have already met the standards and needs of the users. This study aimed to evaluate the utilization and perception of telemedicine users from the perspective of healthcare providers. One hundred and eighteen responses were gathered to see healthcare providers' point of view on the telemedicine platform they used using a social-media broadcasted questionnaire. This questionnaire was adapted from the mHealth Application Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ) to see healthcare providers' points of view on the telemedicine platform they used. Data obtained from 16th - 29th June 2020 were analyzed descriptively then presented in a distribution table. Four telemedicine platforms mainly used were Alodokter, Halodoc, Mobile JKN, and Hospital-linked Telemedicine. Three-forth of respondents stated that they used the telemedicine platform due to the flexible working hours (75.4%), as an alternative during the pandemic and easy to use (71.2%), widespread in the society (50.8%), and most healthcare services have consultation sessions (93.2%). The majority of respondents prioritized doctor-patient communication during practice (89.0%). SehatPedia had the highest average score among platforms users. Majority of healthcare providers feel the benefits of using telemedicine. The quality of healthcare service served by healthcare providers does not diminish compared to in-person healthcare service, and that Telemedicine should further be developed.
印度尼西亚远程医疗的利用和感知:医疗保健提供者的观点
如今,远程医疗的普及已经开始在印度尼西亚蓬勃发展,并越来越多地成为人们接受的做法。然而,印度尼西亚现有的远程医疗平台是否已经满足了用户的标准和需求仍然是模糊的。本研究旨在从医疗服务提供者的角度,评估远程医疗使用者的使用与认知。收集了118份答复,以了解医疗保健提供者对他们使用的远程医疗平台的看法,并使用社交媒体广播问卷。这份调查问卷改编自移动医疗应用可用性调查问卷(MAUQ),以了解医疗保健提供者对他们使用的远程医疗平台的看法。对2020年6月16日至29日获得的数据进行描述性分析,然后在分布表中列出。主要使用的四个远程医疗平台是Alodokter、Halodoc、Mobile JKN和医院联网远程医疗。四分之三的受访者表示,使用远程医疗平台的原因是工作时间灵活(75.4%),作为疫情期间的替代选择且易于使用(71.2%),在社会中广泛存在(50.8%),大多数医疗服务都有会诊(93.2%)。大多数受访者在实践中优先考虑医患沟通(89.0%)。SehatPedia在平台用户中平均得分最高。大多数医疗保健提供者都感受到使用远程医疗的好处。与面对面的医疗服务相比,医疗服务提供者提供的医疗服务质量并没有下降,远程医疗应该进一步发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信