Outcome of Malleable Penile Implant and End Stage of Erectile Dysfunction Single Centre Experience

M. A. Jan, Ishan Khan, K. Tariq, S. Opal, Naveed Naveed, Ikram Samiullah
{"title":"Outcome of Malleable Penile Implant and End Stage of Erectile Dysfunction Single Centre Experience","authors":"M. A. Jan, Ishan Khan, K. Tariq, S. Opal, Naveed Naveed, Ikram Samiullah","doi":"10.47672/ajhmn.1011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) is typically the preferred implant for Peronei’s disease (PD) and malleable penile prostheses (MPPs) have been discouraged. \nObjective: To share experience of malleable penile implant in younger patients at institute of kidney disease Peshawar in a developing country. \nMaterials and Methods: Total of 24 Patients were included in this study who underwent malleable penile prosthesis surgery from July 2017 till June 2020 were included. They all counseled thoroughly regarding procedure, success statistics, possible complications and post-operative follow up. During follow up any problem if occurred and satisfaction documented. Data analysis done with SPSS version 22. \nResults: mean age of 31.7 (27-65) years were included. The most common etiology of ED was vasculogenic (n=10, 41.7%). The comorbidities found were diabetes mellitus and hypertension in 12.5% each (n=3), these patients had no comorbidities (n=18, 75%). The mean size of penile prosthesis was 11.79mm (ranged from 9.5-13mm). We had four patients (16.7%) with unconsummated marriage due to ED. The post-operative problems noted were penile numbness (n=4, 16.7%), retarded ejaculation (n=4, 16.7%), penile pain (n=3, 12.55), hematoma (n=1, 4.2%) and lower urinary tract symptoms (n=1, 4.2%). Most of these patients were fully satisfied (n=15, 62.5%), some were partially satisfied (n=7, 29.2%), only two patients were not satisfied (8.3%) while all patients had their partner satisfaction with malleable penile prosthesis. Inappropriately, patients had presented initially to urologist, rest of all 24 patients were initially treated by quacks, general practitioners, homeopaths, spiritual healers, dermatologists, gynecologists and psychiatrists. All patients had no sense about erectile dysfunction. Patients have idea about discussion of specific field consultant. Their doctor only deal with urology, kidney and bladder pathologies. \nConclusion: Malleable penile prosthesis has great success rate in end point erectile dysfunction with acceptable complication rate. E.D is a global problem. There has been an incredible ignorance in the public about proper referral and management of Sexual dysfunction. Herbal medications are marginally effective and management of erectile dysfunction.","PeriodicalId":7672,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing Practice","volume":"242 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47672/ajhmn.1011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) is typically the preferred implant for Peronei’s disease (PD) and malleable penile prostheses (MPPs) have been discouraged. Objective: To share experience of malleable penile implant in younger patients at institute of kidney disease Peshawar in a developing country. Materials and Methods: Total of 24 Patients were included in this study who underwent malleable penile prosthesis surgery from July 2017 till June 2020 were included. They all counseled thoroughly regarding procedure, success statistics, possible complications and post-operative follow up. During follow up any problem if occurred and satisfaction documented. Data analysis done with SPSS version 22. Results: mean age of 31.7 (27-65) years were included. The most common etiology of ED was vasculogenic (n=10, 41.7%). The comorbidities found were diabetes mellitus and hypertension in 12.5% each (n=3), these patients had no comorbidities (n=18, 75%). The mean size of penile prosthesis was 11.79mm (ranged from 9.5-13mm). We had four patients (16.7%) with unconsummated marriage due to ED. The post-operative problems noted were penile numbness (n=4, 16.7%), retarded ejaculation (n=4, 16.7%), penile pain (n=3, 12.55), hematoma (n=1, 4.2%) and lower urinary tract symptoms (n=1, 4.2%). Most of these patients were fully satisfied (n=15, 62.5%), some were partially satisfied (n=7, 29.2%), only two patients were not satisfied (8.3%) while all patients had their partner satisfaction with malleable penile prosthesis. Inappropriately, patients had presented initially to urologist, rest of all 24 patients were initially treated by quacks, general practitioners, homeopaths, spiritual healers, dermatologists, gynecologists and psychiatrists. All patients had no sense about erectile dysfunction. Patients have idea about discussion of specific field consultant. Their doctor only deal with urology, kidney and bladder pathologies. Conclusion: Malleable penile prosthesis has great success rate in end point erectile dysfunction with acceptable complication rate. E.D is a global problem. There has been an incredible ignorance in the public about proper referral and management of Sexual dysfunction. Herbal medications are marginally effective and management of erectile dysfunction.
可塑阴茎植入物与勃起功能障碍终末期单中心体验的结果
背景:充气式阴茎假体(IPP)是治疗Peronei病(PD)的首选假体,而可塑性阴茎假体(mpp)已不受欢迎。目的:分享发展中国家白沙瓦肾病研究所年轻患者可塑阴茎植入术的经验。材料与方法:本研究纳入2017年7月至2020年6月行延展性阴茎假体手术的患者24例。他们都对手术、成功统计、可能的并发症和术后随访进行了彻底的咨询。在跟踪过程中,如果出现任何问题,并记录满意情况。数据分析完成SPSS版本22。结果:平均年龄31.7岁(27-65岁)。ED最常见的病因是血管源性(n=10, 41.7%)。合并糖尿病和高血压的患者各占12.5% (n=3),无合并高血压的患者占18.75% (n=18)。阴茎假体平均尺寸为11.79mm (9.5 ~ 13mm)。我们有4例(16.7%)因勃起功能障碍导致未完成婚姻的患者。术后注意到的问题是阴茎麻木(n=4, 16.7%)、射精迟滞(n=4, 16.7%)、阴茎疼痛(n=3, 12.55)、血肿(n=1, 4.2%)和下尿路症状(n=1, 4.2%)。大多数患者完全满意(n=15, 62.5%),部分满意(n=7, 29.2%),只有2例患者不满意(8.3%),所有患者的伴侣对可塑阴茎假体满意。不恰当的是,患者最初是向泌尿科医生就诊,其余24名患者最初由庸医、全科医生、顺势疗法医生、精神治疗师、皮肤科医生、妇科医生和精神科医生治疗。所有患者均无勃起功能障碍感。患者对具体领域会诊医师的讨论有想法。他们的医生只治疗泌尿科、肾脏和膀胱疾病。结论:可塑阴茎假体治疗终末性勃起功能障碍成功率高,并发症发生率可接受。ed是一个全球性问题。公众对性功能障碍的适当转诊和管理有着令人难以置信的无知。草药治疗勃起功能障碍的效果不明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信