‘Orgies in the Garden of Heaven’ – the pornographic playground of Alan Moore and Melinda Gebbie’s Lost Girls

IF 0.7 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. Brown, Jude Roberts
{"title":"‘Orgies in the Garden of Heaven’ – the pornographic playground of Alan Moore and Melinda Gebbie’s Lost Girls","authors":"M. Brown, Jude Roberts","doi":"10.1080/14735784.2021.1955719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this article we situate Alan Moore and Melinda Gebbie's Lost Girls as a ‘pornographic playground' arguing that it is through ‘play' that the text is able to position itself as serious and not-serious simultaneously, something central to its navigation of the ethics of its pornographic mode. Contextualising our analysis by considering the relative absence of ‘sex' as an example of ‘play' in scholarly texts, as well as the debates around the porn-wars, we argue Lost Girls uses a playful mode as part of its subversive reiteration of pornography, and as an attempt to render pornography ‘feminine’. In doing this, it nevertheless creates a space of tacit exclusion, creating a sexual playground predicated upon class privilege. However, it is as a space of play that the text navigates the ethics of representation – something particularly important to its dealing with serious themes including sexual assault, incest and paedophilia – by insisting upon the simultaneous connection and separation between the actual and imaginary, the real-world and not-real-image/text/imagination. Speaking back to wider debates around pornography, the text positions the navigation of such ambiguity as central not only to the ethics of texts, but also to the creation of spaces of play.","PeriodicalId":43943,"journal":{"name":"Culture Theory and Critique","volume":"2 1","pages":"223 - 248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture Theory and Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2021.1955719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this article we situate Alan Moore and Melinda Gebbie's Lost Girls as a ‘pornographic playground' arguing that it is through ‘play' that the text is able to position itself as serious and not-serious simultaneously, something central to its navigation of the ethics of its pornographic mode. Contextualising our analysis by considering the relative absence of ‘sex' as an example of ‘play' in scholarly texts, as well as the debates around the porn-wars, we argue Lost Girls uses a playful mode as part of its subversive reiteration of pornography, and as an attempt to render pornography ‘feminine’. In doing this, it nevertheless creates a space of tacit exclusion, creating a sexual playground predicated upon class privilege. However, it is as a space of play that the text navigates the ethics of representation – something particularly important to its dealing with serious themes including sexual assault, incest and paedophilia – by insisting upon the simultaneous connection and separation between the actual and imaginary, the real-world and not-real-image/text/imagination. Speaking back to wider debates around pornography, the text positions the navigation of such ambiguity as central not only to the ethics of texts, but also to the creation of spaces of play.
“天堂花园的狂欢”——艾伦·摩尔和梅林达·格比的《迷失的女孩》中的色情游乐场
在本文中,我们将艾伦·摩尔和梅林达·格比的《迷失的女孩》定位为一个“色情游乐场”,认为正是通过“游戏”,文本能够同时将自己定位为严肃和不严肃,这是其色情模式伦理导航的核心。通过将“性”的相对缺失作为学术文本中“游戏”的例子,以及围绕色情战争的辩论,将我们的分析置于背景中,我们认为,《迷失的女孩》使用了一种游戏模式,作为其颠覆性重申色情的一部分,并试图使色情“女性化”。然而,在这样做的过程中,它创造了一个隐性排斥的空间,创造了一个基于阶级特权的性游乐场。然而,正是作为一个游戏空间,文本通过坚持现实与想象、现实世界与非现实图像/文本/想象之间的同时联系和分离,来引导表现的伦理——这对处理包括性侵犯、乱伦和恋童癖在内的严肃主题尤为重要。回到关于色情的更广泛的争论,文本不仅将这种模糊性定位为文本伦理的核心,而且还将其定位为游戏空间的创造。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Culture Theory and Critique
Culture Theory and Critique HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信