Productivity and the Dairy Industry

IF 0.3 Q4 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
A. Watson
{"title":"Productivity and the Dairy Industry","authors":"A. Watson","doi":"10.22004/AG.ECON.126554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Productivity measurement is useful in some circumstances but not others. Measured productivity is poor for the Australian dairy industry as a whole. This finding is consistent across a range of studies and is confirmed by other information and analysis.It is useful to explore reasons for this poor performance because some public policy questions are related to overall industry performance. In particular, productivity measurement concentrates attention on industry-based research and extension programs.Production (and exports) have increased rapidly in the dairy industry but input use has increased faster. The major change has been increased grain feeding. Both increased purchases of grain and a higher proportion of exports exacerbate the financial risks of dairy farming. Recent drought and associated water shortages in irrigated dairying areas have compounded these systematic changes. By definition, estimates of average productivity in the whole dairy industry have little to say about what is happening on individual farms. Moreover, productivity is measured using annual data on inputs and outputs. While day-to-day technical and management skills are important, many of the crucial economic decisions by farmers are long-term. Aggregate productivity analysis is a useful first step in analysing industry performance. A next step is disaggregating the data to identify inputs, regions or time periods of particular interest. The time path of prices, policy changes and the weather continue to have most effect on the dairy industry. A conclusion that follows from recent experience is that the change to increased grain feeding has not been well understood in its scientific dimension, nor well executed at the farm level. Furthermore, expected gains from specialisation in manufacturing milk production following deregulation have not been realised for technical reasons, presumably related to poor reproductive performance. In particular, it appears that farmers have been given poor information on the difference between the marginal costs and marginal benefits of concentrate feeding in different time periods and circumstances. Nor have the financial consequences been properly considered in advice that has been given to farmers. Production is not the same as productivity. Increased production and exports should not be promoted as such by dairy companie","PeriodicalId":41561,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Agribusiness Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Agribusiness Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.126554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Productivity measurement is useful in some circumstances but not others. Measured productivity is poor for the Australian dairy industry as a whole. This finding is consistent across a range of studies and is confirmed by other information and analysis.It is useful to explore reasons for this poor performance because some public policy questions are related to overall industry performance. In particular, productivity measurement concentrates attention on industry-based research and extension programs.Production (and exports) have increased rapidly in the dairy industry but input use has increased faster. The major change has been increased grain feeding. Both increased purchases of grain and a higher proportion of exports exacerbate the financial risks of dairy farming. Recent drought and associated water shortages in irrigated dairying areas have compounded these systematic changes. By definition, estimates of average productivity in the whole dairy industry have little to say about what is happening on individual farms. Moreover, productivity is measured using annual data on inputs and outputs. While day-to-day technical and management skills are important, many of the crucial economic decisions by farmers are long-term. Aggregate productivity analysis is a useful first step in analysing industry performance. A next step is disaggregating the data to identify inputs, regions or time periods of particular interest. The time path of prices, policy changes and the weather continue to have most effect on the dairy industry. A conclusion that follows from recent experience is that the change to increased grain feeding has not been well understood in its scientific dimension, nor well executed at the farm level. Furthermore, expected gains from specialisation in manufacturing milk production following deregulation have not been realised for technical reasons, presumably related to poor reproductive performance. In particular, it appears that farmers have been given poor information on the difference between the marginal costs and marginal benefits of concentrate feeding in different time periods and circumstances. Nor have the financial consequences been properly considered in advice that has been given to farmers. Production is not the same as productivity. Increased production and exports should not be promoted as such by dairy companie
生产力与乳业
生产率度量在某些情况下是有用的,但在其他情况下则不然。对整个澳大利亚乳制品行业来说,衡量的生产率很低。这一发现在一系列研究中是一致的,并得到了其他信息和分析的证实。探究这种糟糕表现的原因是有用的,因为一些公共政策问题与整体行业绩效有关。特别是,生产率测量将注意力集中在基于行业的研究和推广计划上。乳制品行业的生产(和出口)增长迅速,但投入使用增长更快。主要的变化是增加了粮食的饲养。谷物购买量的增加和出口比例的提高都加剧了奶牛业的金融风险。最近的干旱和与之相关的灌溉奶牛场缺水加剧了这些系统性变化。根据定义,对整个乳制品行业的平均生产率的估计几乎不能说明个别农场的情况。此外,生产率是用投入和产出的年度数据来衡量的。虽然日常技术和管理技能很重要,但农民的许多关键经济决策都是长期的。总生产率分析是分析行业绩效的有用的第一步。下一步是分解数据,以确定输入、区域或特别感兴趣的时间段。价格的时间路径、政策变化和天气继续对乳制品行业产生最大影响。从最近的经验中得出的结论是,增加粮食喂养的变化在科学层面上没有得到很好的理解,在农场层面上也没有得到很好的执行。此外,由于技术原因(可能与较差的繁殖性能有关),放松管制后牛奶生产专业化的预期收益尚未实现。特别是,对于不同时期和情况下精料饲养的边际成本和边际效益之间的差异,农民似乎没有得到足够的信息。在给农民的建议中也没有适当考虑到经济后果。生产不等于生产力。奶制品公司不应该这样宣传增产和出口
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Agribusiness Review
Australasian Agribusiness Review AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信