Comparison of Mortality and Therapy in Community Acquired Pneumonia

Gina Maki, D. Moreno, A. Harris, S. Lawrence, A. Masica, L. Lamerato, M. Zervos
{"title":"Comparison of Mortality and Therapy in Community Acquired Pneumonia","authors":"Gina Maki, D. Moreno, A. Harris, S. Lawrence, A. Masica, L. Lamerato, M. Zervos","doi":"10.18297/JRI/VOL2/ISS2/5/","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Community associated pneumonia (CAP) is one the most common causes of hospital admissions, exceeding more than one million per year in the United States, contributing to 3.4% of inpatient mortality. Our objective was to compare 30-day mortality using therapies recommended for treatment of CAP. Methods: A multicenter retrospective analysis from four different hospitals was assessed from 2008 to 2013. The data was obtained from electronic medical records which included more than 70,000 patients. CAP patients were identified using discharge diagnostic codes during the years 2008-2013, as well as receiving therapy with ceftriaxone and azithromycin or a respiratory fluoroquinolone. Demographic data, antibiotic therapy, and Charlson comorbidity score was obtained to compare the study groups. Results: A total of 21,800 patients met the inclusion criteria for CAP. 1,740 patients were excluded as they received both beta-lactams and fluoroquinolones. The study included 20,600 patients. 11,201 patients (55.84%) received ceftriaxone with azithromycin, and 8,859 (44.16%) received fluoroquinolone therapy. The mortality rate for patients who received fluoroquinolone therapy was lower compared to the patients who received ceftriaxone plus azithromycin (3.56% vs 6.71%, p-value <0.001). Conclusions: Our study showed statistically significant lower 30-day mortality using fluoroquinolone therapy compared to ceftriaxone plus azithromycin for treatment of CAP. Prospective blinded randomized control trials would be needed to support this evidence. DOI: 10.18297/jri/vol2/iss2/5 Received Date: July 20, 2018 Accepted Date: August 9, 2018 Website: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/jri Copyright: ©2018 the author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Affiliations: 1Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit MI 2Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 3Washington University, St. Louis, MO 4Baylor Scott & White Health, Dallas, TX 5Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI *Correspondence To: Gina Maki, DO Work Address: Department of Internal Medicine Henry Ford Hospital 2799 West Grand Boulevard Detroit, Michigan, USA. Work Email: gmaki1@hfhs.org Work Phone: 313-916-3623 19 ULJRI Vol 2, (2) 2018 ORIGINAL RESEARCH hospital length of stay, readmission status, and mortality within 30 days was collected from each of the four hospitals’ electronic medical records (EMR). Information was obtained from each participating centers’ EMR which was then entered into a single database. This database included approximately 70,000 patients. Data was de-identified and coded using explicit data specifications and uploaded into one large database. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) at each participating institution. Teleconferences, enrollments reports, and data audits were conducted between the four study sites to ensure uniform data collection. All hospitalized patients in these hospitals between January 1, 2008 and December 30, 2012 with a discharge diagnosis of pneumonia were identified. Patients were included in the present study if: 1) They were aged ≥18 years; 2) They had received either ceftriaxone plus azithromycin, levofloxacin, or moxifloxacin for the duration of the hospitalization with no other antibiotics administered. Exclusion criteria included: 1) Patients who received other antimicrobial agents; 2) Patients with diagnosis of pneumonia with no information on therapy; 3) Patients who received both therapies. The primary outcome of the study was 30-day all-cause mortality. In hospital mortality was used as a marker for 30-day mortality, as our database was unable to assess 30-day mortality. The patients’ severity of comorbidities was assessed using Charlson comorbidity index. Statistical Methods Univariate statistical analysis was used to test the association of demographic and clinical characteristics with all-cause discharge mortality. Categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables were analyzed using an unpaired t-test. All variables with a p-value < 0.05 in the univariate analysis were included into the multivariate logistic regression. The stepwise selection method was performed to generate the final model (P≤0.05 required for variable entry, P≤0.10 required for variable removal). All p-values were two-sided. Analyses were performed by using SAS 9.4.","PeriodicalId":91979,"journal":{"name":"The University of Louisville journal of respiratory infections","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The University of Louisville journal of respiratory infections","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18297/JRI/VOL2/ISS2/5/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Community associated pneumonia (CAP) is one the most common causes of hospital admissions, exceeding more than one million per year in the United States, contributing to 3.4% of inpatient mortality. Our objective was to compare 30-day mortality using therapies recommended for treatment of CAP. Methods: A multicenter retrospective analysis from four different hospitals was assessed from 2008 to 2013. The data was obtained from electronic medical records which included more than 70,000 patients. CAP patients were identified using discharge diagnostic codes during the years 2008-2013, as well as receiving therapy with ceftriaxone and azithromycin or a respiratory fluoroquinolone. Demographic data, antibiotic therapy, and Charlson comorbidity score was obtained to compare the study groups. Results: A total of 21,800 patients met the inclusion criteria for CAP. 1,740 patients were excluded as they received both beta-lactams and fluoroquinolones. The study included 20,600 patients. 11,201 patients (55.84%) received ceftriaxone with azithromycin, and 8,859 (44.16%) received fluoroquinolone therapy. The mortality rate for patients who received fluoroquinolone therapy was lower compared to the patients who received ceftriaxone plus azithromycin (3.56% vs 6.71%, p-value <0.001). Conclusions: Our study showed statistically significant lower 30-day mortality using fluoroquinolone therapy compared to ceftriaxone plus azithromycin for treatment of CAP. Prospective blinded randomized control trials would be needed to support this evidence. DOI: 10.18297/jri/vol2/iss2/5 Received Date: July 20, 2018 Accepted Date: August 9, 2018 Website: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/jri Copyright: ©2018 the author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Affiliations: 1Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit MI 2Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 3Washington University, St. Louis, MO 4Baylor Scott & White Health, Dallas, TX 5Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI *Correspondence To: Gina Maki, DO Work Address: Department of Internal Medicine Henry Ford Hospital 2799 West Grand Boulevard Detroit, Michigan, USA. Work Email: gmaki1@hfhs.org Work Phone: 313-916-3623 19 ULJRI Vol 2, (2) 2018 ORIGINAL RESEARCH hospital length of stay, readmission status, and mortality within 30 days was collected from each of the four hospitals’ electronic medical records (EMR). Information was obtained from each participating centers’ EMR which was then entered into a single database. This database included approximately 70,000 patients. Data was de-identified and coded using explicit data specifications and uploaded into one large database. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) at each participating institution. Teleconferences, enrollments reports, and data audits were conducted between the four study sites to ensure uniform data collection. All hospitalized patients in these hospitals between January 1, 2008 and December 30, 2012 with a discharge diagnosis of pneumonia were identified. Patients were included in the present study if: 1) They were aged ≥18 years; 2) They had received either ceftriaxone plus azithromycin, levofloxacin, or moxifloxacin for the duration of the hospitalization with no other antibiotics administered. Exclusion criteria included: 1) Patients who received other antimicrobial agents; 2) Patients with diagnosis of pneumonia with no information on therapy; 3) Patients who received both therapies. The primary outcome of the study was 30-day all-cause mortality. In hospital mortality was used as a marker for 30-day mortality, as our database was unable to assess 30-day mortality. The patients’ severity of comorbidities was assessed using Charlson comorbidity index. Statistical Methods Univariate statistical analysis was used to test the association of demographic and clinical characteristics with all-cause discharge mortality. Categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables were analyzed using an unpaired t-test. All variables with a p-value < 0.05 in the univariate analysis were included into the multivariate logistic regression. The stepwise selection method was performed to generate the final model (P≤0.05 required for variable entry, P≤0.10 required for variable removal). All p-values were two-sided. Analyses were performed by using SAS 9.4.
社区获得性肺炎死亡率与治疗的比较
背景:社区相关性肺炎(CAP)是最常见的住院原因之一,在美国每年超过100万人,占住院患者死亡率的3.4%。我们的目的是比较使用推荐的治疗方法治疗CAP的30天死亡率。方法:对2008年至2013年来自四家不同医院的多中心回顾性分析进行评估。这些数据是从电子病历中获得的,其中包括7万多名患者。在2008-2013年期间使用出院诊断代码识别CAP患者,并接受头孢曲松和阿奇霉素或呼吸用氟喹诺酮类药物治疗。获得人口学数据、抗生素治疗和Charlson合并症评分来比较研究组。结果:共有21800例患者符合CAP的纳入标准,1740例患者因同时接受β -内酰胺类药物和氟喹诺酮类药物而被排除在外。该研究包括20,600名患者。头孢曲松联合阿奇霉素治疗11,201例(55.84%),氟喹诺酮治疗8,859例(44.16%)。氟喹诺酮类药物组的死亡率低于头孢曲松联合阿奇霉素组(3.56% vs 6.71%, p值<0.001)。结论:我们的研究显示,与头孢曲松加阿奇霉素治疗CAP相比,氟喹诺酮类药物治疗的30天死亡率具有统计学意义。需要前瞻性盲法随机对照试验来支持这一证据。DOI: 10.18297/jri/vol2/iss2/5收稿日期:2018年7月20日接收日期:2018年8月9日网站:https://ir.library.louisville.edu/jri版权所有:©2018作者。这是一篇在知识共享署名4.0国际许可协议(CC BY 4.0)下发布的开放获取文章,该协议允许在任何媒体上不受限制地使用、分发和复制,前提是要注明原作者和来源。隶属单位:1密歇根州底特律亨利福特医院传染病科医学部2马里兰州巴尔的摩马里兰大学医学院流行病学和公共卫生系3密苏里州圣路易斯华盛顿大学4德克萨斯州达拉斯市贝勒斯科特与怀特健康中心5密歇根州底特律韦恩州立大学医学院*通讯作者:Gina Maki工作地址:美国密歇根州底特律西格兰大道2799号亨利福特医院内科工作邮箱:gmaki1@hfhs.org工作电话:313-916-3623 19 ULJRI Vol 2, (2) 2018 ORIGINAL RESEARCH从四家医院的电子病历(EMR)中收集住院时间、再入院状态和30天内的死亡率。从每个参与中心的电子病历中获得信息,然后将其输入单个数据库。该数据库包括大约7万名患者。使用明确的数据规范对数据进行去识别和编码,并将其上传到一个大型数据库中。研究方案由各参与机构的机构审查委员会(IRB)批准。在四个研究地点之间进行了电话会议、登记报告和数据审计,以确保统一的数据收集。对2008年1月1日至2012年12月30日期间所有出院诊断为肺炎的住院患者进行了鉴定。纳入本研究的患者符合以下条件:1)年龄≥18岁;2)他们在住院期间接受头孢曲松加阿奇霉素、左氧氟沙星或莫西沙星治疗,未使用其他抗生素。排除标准包括:1)使用过其他抗菌药物的患者;2)诊断为肺炎但无治疗信息的患者;3)同时接受两种治疗的患者。该研究的主要结果是30天全因死亡率。住院死亡率被用作30天死亡率的标记,因为我们的数据库无法评估30天死亡率。采用Charlson合并症指数评价患者合并症的严重程度。统计学方法采用单因素统计分析,检验人口学和临床特征与全因出院死亡率的关系。分类变量分析使用卡方检验或费雪精确检验。使用非配对t检验对连续变量进行分析。单因素分析中p值< 0.05的所有变量均纳入多因素logistic回归。采用逐步选择法生成最终模型(变量输入要求P≤0.05,变量移除要求P≤0.10)。所有的p值都是双面的。采用SAS 9.4软件进行分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信