Modelling Genetic Benefits and Financial Costs of Integrating Biobanking into the Captive Management of Koalas.

Q4 Medicine
Lachlan G Howell, Stephen D Johnston, Justine K O'Brien, Richard Frankham, John C Rodger, Shelby A Ryan, Chad T Beranek, John Clulow, Donald S Hudson, Ryan R Witt
{"title":"Modelling Genetic Benefits and Financial Costs of Integrating Biobanking into the Captive Management of Koalas.","authors":"Lachlan G Howell, Stephen D Johnston, Justine K O'Brien, Richard Frankham, John C Rodger, Shelby A Ryan, Chad T Beranek, John Clulow, Donald S Hudson, Ryan R Witt","doi":"10.3390/ani12080990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Zoo and wildlife hospital networks are set to become a vital component of Australia's contemporary efforts to conserve the iconic and imperiled koala (<i>Phascolarctos cinereus</i>). Managed breeding programs held across zoo-based networks typically face high economic costs and can be at risk of adverse genetic effects typical of unavoidably small captive colonies. Emerging evidence suggests that biobanking and associated assisted reproductive technologies could address these economic and genetic challenges. We present a modelled scenario, supported by detailed costings, where these technologies are optimized and could be integrated into conservation breeding programs of koalas across the established zoo and wildlife hospital network. Genetic and economic modelling comparing closed captive koala populations suggest that supplementing them with cryopreserved founder sperm using artificial insemination or intracytoplasmic sperm injection could substantially reduce inbreeding, lower the required colony sizes of conservation breeding programs, and greatly reduce program costs. Ambitious genetic retention targets (maintaining 90%, 95% and 99% of source population heterozygosity for 100 years) could be possible within realistic cost frameworks, with output koalas suited for wild release. Integrating biobanking into the zoo and wildlife hospital network presents a cost-effective and financially feasible model for the uptake of these tools due to the technical and research expertise, captive koala colonies, and <i>ex situ</i> facilities that already exist across these networks.</p>","PeriodicalId":50832,"journal":{"name":"Aktuelle Neurologie","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9028793/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aktuelle Neurologie","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12080990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Zoo and wildlife hospital networks are set to become a vital component of Australia's contemporary efforts to conserve the iconic and imperiled koala (Phascolarctos cinereus). Managed breeding programs held across zoo-based networks typically face high economic costs and can be at risk of adverse genetic effects typical of unavoidably small captive colonies. Emerging evidence suggests that biobanking and associated assisted reproductive technologies could address these economic and genetic challenges. We present a modelled scenario, supported by detailed costings, where these technologies are optimized and could be integrated into conservation breeding programs of koalas across the established zoo and wildlife hospital network. Genetic and economic modelling comparing closed captive koala populations suggest that supplementing them with cryopreserved founder sperm using artificial insemination or intracytoplasmic sperm injection could substantially reduce inbreeding, lower the required colony sizes of conservation breeding programs, and greatly reduce program costs. Ambitious genetic retention targets (maintaining 90%, 95% and 99% of source population heterozygosity for 100 years) could be possible within realistic cost frameworks, with output koalas suited for wild release. Integrating biobanking into the zoo and wildlife hospital network presents a cost-effective and financially feasible model for the uptake of these tools due to the technical and research expertise, captive koala colonies, and ex situ facilities that already exist across these networks.

建立将生物库纳入考拉圈养管理的遗传效益和财务成本模型。
动物园和野生动物医院网络将成为澳大利亚保护濒危考拉(Phascolarctos cinereus)的重要组成部分。基于动物园网络的管理繁育计划通常面临着高昂的经济成本,并且可能面临着因圈养群规模过小而不可避免地产生不利遗传效应的风险。新的证据表明,生物库和相关的辅助生殖技术可以解决这些经济和遗传方面的挑战。我们提出了一个模型方案,并辅以详细的成本计算,在该方案中,这些技术得到了优化,并可被整合到动物园和野生动物医院网络的考拉保护繁殖计划中。对封闭的人工饲养考拉种群进行遗传和经济建模比较后发现,利用人工授精或卵胞浆内单精子注射技术补充低温保存的始祖精子,可以大大减少近亲繁殖,降低保护性繁殖项目所需的种群规模,并大大降低项目成本。在现实的成本框架内,雄心勃勃的基因保留目标(100 年内保持 90%、95% 和 99% 的源种群杂合度)是可能实现的,产出的考拉适合野外放归。由于动物园和野生动物医院网络拥有技术和研究专长、圈养考拉群落和异地设施,因此将生物库纳入动物园和野生动物医院网络为这些工具的采用提供了一个具有成本效益和经济可行性的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aktuelle Neurologie
Aktuelle Neurologie 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cessation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信