Logic Diagnosis with Hybrid Fail Data

I. Pomeranz, M. E. Amyeen
{"title":"Logic Diagnosis with Hybrid Fail Data","authors":"I. Pomeranz, M. E. Amyeen","doi":"10.1145/3433929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Yield improvement requires information about the defects present in faulty units. This information is derived by applying a logic diagnosis procedure to the fail data collected by a tester from faulty units. It is typical in the early stages of yield learning to find faulty units that produce excessive volumes of fail data. The current practice is to terminate the fail data collection and possibly discard the fail data already collected for the unit. An earlier study shows that a faulty unit may produce excessive volumes of fail data for some tests but not for others. Based on this observation, a possible solution is to collect full fail data only for tests where this is feasible and pass/fail information for other tests. For this approach to be practical, it is necessary to be able to perform logic diagnosis with hybrid fail data that consists of full fail data for some tests and only pass/fail information for other tests. The main challenge in designing such a procedure is to balance the use of the two types of data to produce accurate logic diagnosis results. This article describes a logic diagnosis procedure, from the class of procedures used by commercial tools, that addresses this challenge. Experimental results for benchmark circuits demonstrate the importance of pass/fail information in this scenario.","PeriodicalId":6933,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems (TODAES)","volume":"22 1","pages":"1 - 13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems (TODAES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3433929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Yield improvement requires information about the defects present in faulty units. This information is derived by applying a logic diagnosis procedure to the fail data collected by a tester from faulty units. It is typical in the early stages of yield learning to find faulty units that produce excessive volumes of fail data. The current practice is to terminate the fail data collection and possibly discard the fail data already collected for the unit. An earlier study shows that a faulty unit may produce excessive volumes of fail data for some tests but not for others. Based on this observation, a possible solution is to collect full fail data only for tests where this is feasible and pass/fail information for other tests. For this approach to be practical, it is necessary to be able to perform logic diagnosis with hybrid fail data that consists of full fail data for some tests and only pass/fail information for other tests. The main challenge in designing such a procedure is to balance the use of the two types of data to produce accurate logic diagnosis results. This article describes a logic diagnosis procedure, from the class of procedures used by commercial tools, that addresses this challenge. Experimental results for benchmark circuits demonstrate the importance of pass/fail information in this scenario.
混合故障数据的逻辑诊断
良率的提高需要有缺陷部件中存在缺陷的信息。该信息是通过对测试人员从故障单元收集的故障数据应用逻辑诊断程序而得到的。在产量学习的早期阶段,发现产生过多故障数据的故障单元是典型的。目前的做法是终止故障数据收集,并可能丢弃已经为该单元收集的故障数据。早期的一项研究表明,一个有故障的单元可能会对某些测试产生过多的失败数据,而对其他测试则不会。根据这一观察结果,一个可能的解决方案是仅为可行的测试收集完整的失败数据,并为其他测试收集通过/失败信息。为了使这种方法具有实用性,必须能够使用混合故障数据执行逻辑诊断,混合故障数据由某些测试的完整故障数据和其他测试的仅通过/失败信息组成。设计这种程序的主要挑战是平衡两种类型数据的使用,以产生准确的逻辑诊断结果。本文描述了一个逻辑诊断过程,它来自商业工具所使用的过程类,可以解决这个问题。基准电路的实验结果证明了在这种情况下通过/失败信息的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信