Chemical Angioplasty with Nitroglycerin for Vasospasm after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Case Series and Review

IF 0.1 Q4 SURGERY
L. Gatto, B. Gallo, G. Koppe, Zeferino Demartini
{"title":"Chemical Angioplasty with Nitroglycerin for Vasospasm after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Case Series and Review","authors":"L. Gatto, B. Gallo, G. Koppe, Zeferino Demartini","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1740196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Vasospasm is a common and potentially devastating complication in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, causing high morbidity and mortality. There is no effective and consistent way to prevent or treat cerebral vasospasm capable of altering the morbidity and mortality of this complication. Animal and human studies have attempted to show improvement in aneurysmal vasospasm. Some sought their prevention; others, the treatment of already installed vasospasm. Some achieved only angiographic improvement without clinical correlation, others achieved both, but with ephemeral duration or at the expense of very harmful associated effects. Endovascular techniques allow immediate and aggressive treatment of cerebral vasospasm and include methods such as mechanical and chemical angioplasty. These methods have risks and benefits. Objectives To analyze the results of chemical angioplasty using nitroglycerin (GTN). In addition, to perform a comprehensive review and analysis of aneurysmal vasospasm. Methods We describe our series of 77 patients treated for 8 years with angioplasty for vasospasm, either mechanical (with balloon), chemical (with GTN) or both. Results Eleven patients received only balloon; 37 received only GTN; 29 received both. Forty-four patients (70.1%) evolved with delayed cerebral ischemia and 19 died (mortality of 24.7%). Two deaths were causally related to the rupture of the vessel by the balloon. The only predictors of poor outcome were the need for external ventricular drainage in the first hours of admission, and isolated mechanical angioplasty. Conclusions Balloon angioplasty has excellent results, but it is restricted to proximal vessels and is not without complications. Chemical angioplasty using nitroglycerin has reasonable but short-lived results and further research is needed about it. It is restricted to vasospasm angioplasties only in hospitals, like ours, where better and more potent vasodilator agents are not available.","PeriodicalId":42205,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Neurosurgery-Arquivos Brasileiros de Neurocirurgia","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Neurosurgery-Arquivos Brasileiros de Neurocirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Vasospasm is a common and potentially devastating complication in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, causing high morbidity and mortality. There is no effective and consistent way to prevent or treat cerebral vasospasm capable of altering the morbidity and mortality of this complication. Animal and human studies have attempted to show improvement in aneurysmal vasospasm. Some sought their prevention; others, the treatment of already installed vasospasm. Some achieved only angiographic improvement without clinical correlation, others achieved both, but with ephemeral duration or at the expense of very harmful associated effects. Endovascular techniques allow immediate and aggressive treatment of cerebral vasospasm and include methods such as mechanical and chemical angioplasty. These methods have risks and benefits. Objectives To analyze the results of chemical angioplasty using nitroglycerin (GTN). In addition, to perform a comprehensive review and analysis of aneurysmal vasospasm. Methods We describe our series of 77 patients treated for 8 years with angioplasty for vasospasm, either mechanical (with balloon), chemical (with GTN) or both. Results Eleven patients received only balloon; 37 received only GTN; 29 received both. Forty-four patients (70.1%) evolved with delayed cerebral ischemia and 19 died (mortality of 24.7%). Two deaths were causally related to the rupture of the vessel by the balloon. The only predictors of poor outcome were the need for external ventricular drainage in the first hours of admission, and isolated mechanical angioplasty. Conclusions Balloon angioplasty has excellent results, but it is restricted to proximal vessels and is not without complications. Chemical angioplasty using nitroglycerin has reasonable but short-lived results and further research is needed about it. It is restricted to vasospasm angioplasties only in hospitals, like ours, where better and more potent vasodilator agents are not available.
硝酸甘油化学血管成形术治疗蛛网膜下腔出血后血管痉挛:病例系列与回顾
血管痉挛是蛛网膜下腔出血患者常见且具有潜在破坏性的并发症,具有很高的发病率和死亡率。目前还没有有效和一致的方法来预防或治疗脑血管痉挛,从而改变这种并发症的发病率和死亡率。动物和人体研究都试图显示动脉瘤性血管痉挛的改善。有些人寻求预防;另外,治疗已安装血管痉挛。有些仅获得血管造影改善而没有临床相关性,有些两者都获得,但持续时间短暂或以牺牲非常有害的相关影响为代价。血管内技术允许立即和积极治疗脑血管痉挛,包括机械和化学血管成形术等方法。这些方法有风险也有好处。目的分析硝酸甘油(GTN)化学血管成形术的效果。此外,对动脉瘤性血管痉挛进行全面的回顾和分析。方法:我们对77例血管痉挛患者进行了8年的血管成形术治疗,包括机械(球囊)、化学(GTN)或两者兼用。结果11例患者仅接受球囊治疗;37只接受GTN;29人两者都得到了。44例(70.1%)发展为迟发性脑缺血,19例死亡(死亡率24.7%)。有两人的死亡与气球破裂血管有因果关系。预后不良的唯一预测因素是入院前几个小时内需要外心室引流和孤立的机械血管成形术。结论球囊血管成形术效果良好,但仅限于近端血管,并不是没有并发症。硝酸甘油化学血管成形术效果合理,但寿命较短,有待进一步研究。它仅限于在医院进行血管痉挛血管成形术,像我们这样的医院,那里没有更好更有效的血管扩张剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信