EPTAS and Subexponential Algorithm for Maximum Clique on Disk and Unit Ball Graphs

Marthe Bonamy, Édouard Bonnet, N. Bousquet, Pierre Charbit, P. Giannopoulos, Eun Jung Kim, Paweł Rzaͅżewski, F. Sikora, Stéphan Thomassé
{"title":"EPTAS and Subexponential Algorithm for Maximum Clique on Disk and Unit Ball Graphs","authors":"Marthe Bonamy, Édouard Bonnet, N. Bousquet, Pierre Charbit, P. Giannopoulos, Eun Jung Kim, Paweł Rzaͅżewski, F. Sikora, Stéphan Thomassé","doi":"10.1145/3433160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A (unit) disk graph is the intersection graph of closed (unit) disks in the plane. Almost three decades ago, an elegant polynomial-time algorithm was found for MAXIMUM CLIQUE on unit disk graphs [Clark, Colbourn, Johnson; Discrete Mathematics ’90]. Since then, it has been an intriguing open question whether or not tractability can be extended to general disk graphs. We show that the disjoint union of two odd cycles is never the complement of a disk graph nor of a unit (3-dimensional) ball graph. From that fact and existing results, we derive a simple QPTAS and a subexponential algorithm running in time 2Õ(n2/3) for MAXIMUM CLIQUE on disk and unit ball graphs. We then obtain a randomized EPTAS for computing the independence number on graphs having no disjoint union of two odd cycles as an induced subgraph, bounded VC-dimension, and linear independence number. This, in combination with our structural results, yields a randomized EPTAS for MAX CLIQUE on disk and unit ball graphs. MAX CLIQUE on unit ball graphs is equivalent to finding, given a collection of points in R3, a maximum subset of points with diameter at most some fixed value. In stark contrast, MAXIMUM CLIQUE on ball graphs and unit 4-dimensional ball graphs, as well as intersection graphs of filled ellipses (even close to unit disks) or filled triangles is unlikely to have such algorithms. Indeed, we show that, for all those problems, there is a constant ratio of approximation that cannot be attained even in time 2n1−ɛ, unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis fails.","PeriodicalId":17199,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the ACM (JACM)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the ACM (JACM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3433160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

A (unit) disk graph is the intersection graph of closed (unit) disks in the plane. Almost three decades ago, an elegant polynomial-time algorithm was found for MAXIMUM CLIQUE on unit disk graphs [Clark, Colbourn, Johnson; Discrete Mathematics ’90]. Since then, it has been an intriguing open question whether or not tractability can be extended to general disk graphs. We show that the disjoint union of two odd cycles is never the complement of a disk graph nor of a unit (3-dimensional) ball graph. From that fact and existing results, we derive a simple QPTAS and a subexponential algorithm running in time 2Õ(n2/3) for MAXIMUM CLIQUE on disk and unit ball graphs. We then obtain a randomized EPTAS for computing the independence number on graphs having no disjoint union of two odd cycles as an induced subgraph, bounded VC-dimension, and linear independence number. This, in combination with our structural results, yields a randomized EPTAS for MAX CLIQUE on disk and unit ball graphs. MAX CLIQUE on unit ball graphs is equivalent to finding, given a collection of points in R3, a maximum subset of points with diameter at most some fixed value. In stark contrast, MAXIMUM CLIQUE on ball graphs and unit 4-dimensional ball graphs, as well as intersection graphs of filled ellipses (even close to unit disks) or filled triangles is unlikely to have such algorithms. Indeed, we show that, for all those problems, there is a constant ratio of approximation that cannot be attained even in time 2n1−ɛ, unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis fails.
圆盘和单位球图上最大团的EPTAS和亚指数算法
(单位)磁盘图是平面上封闭(单位)磁盘的相交图。大约三十年前,一个优雅的多项式时间算法被发现用于单位磁盘图上的MAXIMUM CLIQUE [Clark, Colbourn, Johnson;[j]。从那时起,可跟踪性是否可以扩展到一般磁盘图一直是一个有趣的开放性问题。我们证明了两个奇环的不相交并既不是圆盘图的补,也不是单位(三维)球图的补。根据这一事实和现有的结果,我们推导了一个简单的QPTAS和一个运行时间为2Õ(n2/3)的亚指数算法,用于磁盘和单位球图上的MAXIMUM CLIQUE。然后,我们得到了一个随机的EPTAS,用于计算两个奇循环不相交并的图作为诱导子图、有界vc维和线性独立数的独立数。这与我们的结构结果相结合,产生了磁盘和单位球图上MAX CLIQUE的随机EPTAS。单位球图上的MAX CLIQUE等价于在R3中给定一个点的集合,求一个直径不超过某个固定值的点的最大子集。与之形成鲜明对比的是,球图和单位四维球图上的MAXIMUM CLIQUE,以及填充椭圆(甚至接近单位圆盘)或填充三角形的相交图不太可能有这样的算法。事实上,我们证明了,对于所有这些问题,存在一个常数的近似比,即使在时间2n1−i中也不能达到,除非指数时间假设失效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信