Does personality categorization affect intergroup attitudes via moderation of personal values and social identity complexity mediation?

IF 1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Current Issues in Personality Psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5114/cipp/156824
Penprapa Prinyapol, Apitchaya Chaiwutikornwanich, Thipnapa Huansuriya
{"title":"Does personality categorization affect intergroup attitudes via moderation of personal values and social identity complexity mediation?","authors":"Penprapa Prinyapol, Apitchaya Chaiwutikornwanich, Thipnapa Huansuriya","doi":"10.5114/cipp/156824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous research indicated that social categorization increased intergroup attitude. The current study extended research on social categorization by adopting the multiple personality categorization concept to explore whether it would alter intergroup attitudes toward Muslims and Buddhists.</p><p><strong>Participants and procedure: </strong>Study 1 examined multiple personality category perceptions among Buddhist and Muslim students living in the troubled southern provinces. Participants were 382 Thai Buddhist and Muslims students of mean age 20.15 years (<i>SD</i> = 1.01). They took the multiple personality categorization perception scale on outgroup perceived personality. Study 2 evaluated a mediated social identity complexity and a moderated personal value in association between multiple personality categorization and intergroup attitudes. Participants were 150 Thai Buddhists and Muslim students of mean age 20.31 years (<i>SD</i> = 0.94). They took the scales of multiple personality categorization: short version, intergroup attitudes, social identity complexity, and personal values. Descriptive statistics, independent <i>t</i>-tests and SEM were used to test hypotheses.</p><p><strong>Results study 1: </strong>Ten shared traits were identified (creative, smart, objective, talented, generous, kind, curious, resourceful, serious, skeptical) by both groups. This brought up awareness of similarity in shared personalities. Study 2: Multiple personality categorization and personal values were linked positively with intergroup attitudes. Personal values affected the links between multiple personality categorization and intergroup attitudes. However, social identity complexity as a mediator was nonsignificant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Muslim and Buddhist students were stimulated to explore their similarity in personality traits. Educators and policy makers may use the findings on personal values and multiple personality categorization to plan long-term sustainable cooperation between Buddhists and Muslims.</p>","PeriodicalId":43067,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Personality Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11129045/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Personality Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp/156824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous research indicated that social categorization increased intergroup attitude. The current study extended research on social categorization by adopting the multiple personality categorization concept to explore whether it would alter intergroup attitudes toward Muslims and Buddhists.

Participants and procedure: Study 1 examined multiple personality category perceptions among Buddhist and Muslim students living in the troubled southern provinces. Participants were 382 Thai Buddhist and Muslims students of mean age 20.15 years (SD = 1.01). They took the multiple personality categorization perception scale on outgroup perceived personality. Study 2 evaluated a mediated social identity complexity and a moderated personal value in association between multiple personality categorization and intergroup attitudes. Participants were 150 Thai Buddhists and Muslim students of mean age 20.31 years (SD = 0.94). They took the scales of multiple personality categorization: short version, intergroup attitudes, social identity complexity, and personal values. Descriptive statistics, independent t-tests and SEM were used to test hypotheses.

Results study 1: Ten shared traits were identified (creative, smart, objective, talented, generous, kind, curious, resourceful, serious, skeptical) by both groups. This brought up awareness of similarity in shared personalities. Study 2: Multiple personality categorization and personal values were linked positively with intergroup attitudes. Personal values affected the links between multiple personality categorization and intergroup attitudes. However, social identity complexity as a mediator was nonsignificant.

Conclusions: Muslim and Buddhist students were stimulated to explore their similarity in personality traits. Educators and policy makers may use the findings on personal values and multiple personality categorization to plan long-term sustainable cooperation between Buddhists and Muslims.

人格分类是否会通过调节个人价值观和社会认同复杂性中介影响群体间态度?
研究背景以前的研究表明,社会分类会增加群体间的态度。本研究通过采用多重性格分类概念来扩展有关社会分类的研究,探讨它是否会改变对穆斯林和佛教徒的群体间态度:研究 1 调查了生活在动荡不安的南部省份的佛教徒和穆斯林学生对多重性格分类的看法。参与者为 382 名泰国佛教徒和穆斯林学生,平均年龄为 20.15 岁(SD = 1.01)。他们参加了关于外群体感知人格的多重人格分类感知量表。研究 2 评估了多重人格分类与群体间态度之间的中介社会身份复杂性和调节个人价值。参与者为 150 名泰国佛教徒和穆斯林学生,平均年龄为 20.31 岁(SD = 0.94)。他们进行了多重人格分类量表(简版)、群体间态度、社会身份复杂性和个人价值观的测量。使用描述性统计、独立 t 检验和 SEM 检验假设。结果 研究 1:两组学生都发现了十个共同的特质(创造力、聪明、客观、有才华、慷慨、善良、好奇、足智多谋、严肃、怀疑)。这唤起了人们对共同性格相似性的认识。研究 2:多重性格分类和个人价值观与群体间态度呈正相关。个人价值观影响了多重性格分类与群体间态度之间的联系。然而,社会身份复杂性作为中介的作用并不显著:穆斯林和佛教徒学生在人格特质相似性方面的探索受到了激励。教育工作者和政策制定者可以利用有关个人价值观和多重人格分类的研究结果来规划佛教徒和穆斯林之间的长期可持续合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信