The effect of adjacent vegetation on fire severity in Afrotemperate forest along the southern Cape coast of South Africa

Brandon Giddey, J. Baard, Lufuno M. Vhengani, T. Kraaij
{"title":"The effect of adjacent vegetation on fire severity in Afrotemperate forest along the southern Cape coast of South Africa","authors":"Brandon Giddey, J. Baard, Lufuno M. Vhengani, T. Kraaij","doi":"10.2989/20702620.2021.1936686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently two large wildfires (around the towns of Knysna in 2017 and George in 2018) jointly burnt over 80 000 ha in the southern Cape, South Africa. Here, patches of closed-canopy Afrotemperate forest occur within a matrix of fire-prone (native) fynbos shrublands or adjacent to commercial plantations of invasive alien Pinus trees (a transformed state). We compared the distances that fire penetrated into forest margins adjacent to fynbos to those adjacent to plantations. Furthermore, we used a satellite-derived index of fire severity, the differenced Normalised Burn Ratio (dNBR), to compare fire severity in forest margins adjacent to fynbos to those adjacent to plantations. Results were inconsistent between the two fires. In the Knysna fire, no significant difference was noted in fire penetration into forest, while forest margins adjacent to plantations burnt at significantly lower severity than those adjacent to fynbos. In the George fire, penetration into and fire severity in forest margins adjacent to plantations were significantly greater than in those adjacent to fynbos. Not only were fire severity and penetration in forest margins with plantations adjacent dissimilar between the George and Knysna fires, but variability in fire severity was greater in forest margins with plantation adjacent than in those with fynbos adjacent. Our study provides evidence that fire severity in forest margins is associated with the adjacent vegetation type and that plantations potentially expose forests to greater variability in fire severity and extent than the forest may experience under natural conditions. Other important factors that may affect the severity and extent of burn in forest margins are forest patch size and topographical position, the nature of the ecotone between forest and the adjacent vegetation, and the fuel load and structure of the adjacent vegetation which varies considerably in relation to stand age and management practices in plantations.","PeriodicalId":21939,"journal":{"name":"Southern Forests: a Journal of Forest Science","volume":"46 1","pages":"225 - 230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Forests: a Journal of Forest Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2021.1936686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Recently two large wildfires (around the towns of Knysna in 2017 and George in 2018) jointly burnt over 80 000 ha in the southern Cape, South Africa. Here, patches of closed-canopy Afrotemperate forest occur within a matrix of fire-prone (native) fynbos shrublands or adjacent to commercial plantations of invasive alien Pinus trees (a transformed state). We compared the distances that fire penetrated into forest margins adjacent to fynbos to those adjacent to plantations. Furthermore, we used a satellite-derived index of fire severity, the differenced Normalised Burn Ratio (dNBR), to compare fire severity in forest margins adjacent to fynbos to those adjacent to plantations. Results were inconsistent between the two fires. In the Knysna fire, no significant difference was noted in fire penetration into forest, while forest margins adjacent to plantations burnt at significantly lower severity than those adjacent to fynbos. In the George fire, penetration into and fire severity in forest margins adjacent to plantations were significantly greater than in those adjacent to fynbos. Not only were fire severity and penetration in forest margins with plantations adjacent dissimilar between the George and Knysna fires, but variability in fire severity was greater in forest margins with plantation adjacent than in those with fynbos adjacent. Our study provides evidence that fire severity in forest margins is associated with the adjacent vegetation type and that plantations potentially expose forests to greater variability in fire severity and extent than the forest may experience under natural conditions. Other important factors that may affect the severity and extent of burn in forest margins are forest patch size and topographical position, the nature of the ecotone between forest and the adjacent vegetation, and the fuel load and structure of the adjacent vegetation which varies considerably in relation to stand age and management practices in plantations.
邻近植被对南非南开普海岸非温带森林火灾严重程度的影响
最近,两场大型野火(2017年在Knysna镇周围,2018年在George镇周围)在南非南部开普省共烧毁了8万多公顷的土地。在这里,封闭冠层的非温带森林斑块出现在易发生火灾的(本地)芬博斯灌丛的基质中,或邻近外来入侵松树的商业人工林(一种转化状态)。我们比较了林火渗透到靠近芬博斯的森林边缘和靠近人工林的森林边缘的距离。此外,我们使用卫星衍生的火灾严重程度指数,即差异归一化燃烧比(dNBR),来比较靠近林带和靠近人工林的森林边缘的火灾严重程度。两次火灾的结果不一致。在Knysna火灾中,火灾渗入森林的程度没有显著差异,而与人工林相邻的森林边缘燃烧的严重程度明显低于与fynbos相邻的森林边缘。在乔治林火中,邻近人工林的林缘渗透度和火灾严重程度显著大于邻近林缘的林缘。乔治林场和克尼斯纳林场在林缘与人工林相邻的林缘,不仅火灾的严重程度和渗透程度不同,而且与人工林相邻的林缘,火灾严重程度的变异性大于与林缘毗邻的林缘。我们的研究提供的证据表明,森林边缘的火灾严重程度与邻近的植被类型有关,人工林可能使森林暴露于比自然条件下森林可能经历的火灾严重程度和程度更大的变化。其他可能影响森林边缘燃烧的严重程度和程度的重要因素是森林斑块的大小和地形位置,森林和邻近植被之间的过渡带的性质,以及邻近植被的燃料负荷和结构,这与林龄和人工林的管理做法有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信