Validation of Methods for Determining Consumer Smoked Cigarette Yields from Cigarette Filter Analysis

CJ Shepperd, F. S. St Charles, M. Lien, M. Dixon
{"title":"Validation of Methods for Determining Consumer Smoked Cigarette Yields from Cigarette Filter Analysis","authors":"CJ Shepperd, F. S. St Charles, M. Lien, M. Dixon","doi":"10.2478/CTTR-2013-0826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Methods based on the analyses of cigarette filters have been used to estimate ‘tar’ and nicotine yields to smokers. These methods rely on the measurement of filtration efficiencies (FEs). However FEs may be influenced by both cigarette design features e.g., type of filter and levels of filter ventilation, and human smoking behaviour factors such as puff flow-rates and cigarette butt lengths. Two filter analysis methods are considered in our study. One is based on the analysis of whole filters using average values of FEs obtained from a range of machine smoking regimes. The other, a ‘part filter’ method, analyses a 10 mm section from the mouth end of the filter where the FE remains relatively constant irrespective of puff flow rates and butt lengths. Human puffing behaviour records were obtained from 10 smokers, each smoking six commercial cigarettes ranging from 1 mg to 12 mg ‘tar’ yields [International Standard (ISO) values]. These records were used to drive a human smoke duplicator and the resulting ‘tar’ and nicotine yields obtained from duplication were compared with the estimates obtained from ‘whole’ and ‘part filter’ analysis. The results indicated that whilst both filter methods gave good correlations with nicotine and ‘tar’ yields obtained from smoke duplication, the ‘part filter’ method was less susceptible to the effect of nicotine condensation and changes in FEs and hence gave a more accurate assessment of yields than the ‘whole filter’ method.","PeriodicalId":10723,"journal":{"name":"Contributions to Tobacco & Nicotine Research","volume":"3 1","pages":"176 - 184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contributions to Tobacco & Nicotine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/CTTR-2013-0826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

Abstract Methods based on the analyses of cigarette filters have been used to estimate ‘tar’ and nicotine yields to smokers. These methods rely on the measurement of filtration efficiencies (FEs). However FEs may be influenced by both cigarette design features e.g., type of filter and levels of filter ventilation, and human smoking behaviour factors such as puff flow-rates and cigarette butt lengths. Two filter analysis methods are considered in our study. One is based on the analysis of whole filters using average values of FEs obtained from a range of machine smoking regimes. The other, a ‘part filter’ method, analyses a 10 mm section from the mouth end of the filter where the FE remains relatively constant irrespective of puff flow rates and butt lengths. Human puffing behaviour records were obtained from 10 smokers, each smoking six commercial cigarettes ranging from 1 mg to 12 mg ‘tar’ yields [International Standard (ISO) values]. These records were used to drive a human smoke duplicator and the resulting ‘tar’ and nicotine yields obtained from duplication were compared with the estimates obtained from ‘whole’ and ‘part filter’ analysis. The results indicated that whilst both filter methods gave good correlations with nicotine and ‘tar’ yields obtained from smoke duplication, the ‘part filter’ method was less susceptible to the effect of nicotine condensation and changes in FEs and hence gave a more accurate assessment of yields than the ‘whole filter’ method.
从香烟过滤嘴分析中测定消费者吸烟香烟产率方法的验证
基于香烟过滤嘴分析的方法已被用于估计吸烟者的“焦油”和尼古丁产量。这些方法依赖于过滤效率(FEs)的测量。然而,FEs可能受到香烟设计特征(如过滤嘴类型和过滤嘴通风水平)和人类吸烟行为因素(如烟流量和烟头长度)的影响。在我们的研究中考虑了两种过滤分析方法。一种是基于对整个过滤器的分析,使用从一系列机器吸烟制度中获得的FEs平均值。另一种是“部分过滤器”方法,从过滤器的嘴端分析10毫米的部分,其中FE保持相对恒定,而不考虑喷流速率和对接长度。从10名吸烟者那里获得了人类吸烟行为记录,每位吸烟者吸烟6支“焦油”含量为1毫克至12毫克的商业香烟[国际标准值]。这些记录被用于驱动人体烟雾复制器,并将从复制中获得的“焦油”和尼古丁产量与从“整体”和“部分过滤器”分析中获得的估计值进行比较。结果表明,虽然两种过滤方法都与尼古丁和从烟雾重复中获得的“焦油”产量具有良好的相关性,但“部分过滤”方法不太容易受到尼古丁凝结和FEs变化的影响,因此比“整体过滤”方法给出了更准确的产量评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信