Acoustic analysis of lexical stress in Greek preschool children

Ioannis Papakyritsis, Panagiota Adamopoulou, Ioanna Kerouli, M. Sifaki
{"title":"Acoustic analysis of lexical stress in Greek preschool children","authors":"Ioannis Papakyritsis, Panagiota Adamopoulou, Ioanna Kerouli, M. Sifaki","doi":"10.1558/jmbs.23559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lexical stress carries significant functional load in Greek; there are several pairs and even triplets of words that are differentiated only by stress position. Greek stressed vowels are longer and have a greater amplitude compared to their unstressed counterparts. Lexical stress is also indirectly signalled by pitch movement (Arvaniti, 2007). The trajectory of lexical stress development has received little attention, both in Greek and in the international literature, especially regarding the acoustic analysis of prominence. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the acoustic realisation of stress during Greek acquisition. To that end, 24 typically developing children aged 4;7 to 6;4 (years;months), and 24 adults aged 20 to 25, carried out a word repetition task involving 20 minimal stress pairs (15 real words and five non-words). Duration, intensity and F0 variation, indices of the relative prominence of stressed to unstressed vowels, were calculated. Overall, although the use of the intensity cue for lexical stress did not differ significantly between the two groups, children tended to use the vowel duration cue to a lesser extent than adults to signal lexical stress position. On the other hand, F0 variation indices were significantly higher in the children’s data. Additionally, the acoustic analysis indicated that children utilized the pattern of devoicing unstressed vowels, a specific type of vowel reduction optionally applied in Greek, much more extensively than adults. Finally, although for the most part the word productions carried unequivocal and correct lexical stress, in a few cases children, contrary to adults, had difficulties signalling lexical stress position in a perceptually transparent manner. This study is one of the few attempts to describe the acoustic characteristics of lexical stress in Greek typical development.","PeriodicalId":73840,"journal":{"name":"Journal of monolingual and bilingual speech","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of monolingual and bilingual speech","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/jmbs.23559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lexical stress carries significant functional load in Greek; there are several pairs and even triplets of words that are differentiated only by stress position. Greek stressed vowels are longer and have a greater amplitude compared to their unstressed counterparts. Lexical stress is also indirectly signalled by pitch movement (Arvaniti, 2007). The trajectory of lexical stress development has received little attention, both in Greek and in the international literature, especially regarding the acoustic analysis of prominence. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the acoustic realisation of stress during Greek acquisition. To that end, 24 typically developing children aged 4;7 to 6;4 (years;months), and 24 adults aged 20 to 25, carried out a word repetition task involving 20 minimal stress pairs (15 real words and five non-words). Duration, intensity and F0 variation, indices of the relative prominence of stressed to unstressed vowels, were calculated. Overall, although the use of the intensity cue for lexical stress did not differ significantly between the two groups, children tended to use the vowel duration cue to a lesser extent than adults to signal lexical stress position. On the other hand, F0 variation indices were significantly higher in the children’s data. Additionally, the acoustic analysis indicated that children utilized the pattern of devoicing unstressed vowels, a specific type of vowel reduction optionally applied in Greek, much more extensively than adults. Finally, although for the most part the word productions carried unequivocal and correct lexical stress, in a few cases children, contrary to adults, had difficulties signalling lexical stress position in a perceptually transparent manner. This study is one of the few attempts to describe the acoustic characteristics of lexical stress in Greek typical development.
希腊语学龄前儿童词汇重音的声学分析
词汇重音在希腊语中具有重要的功能负荷;有几个词的成对甚至三联体只通过重音位置来区分。与非重读元音相比,希腊语重读元音更长,振幅更大。词法重音也通过音高运动间接表示(Arvaniti, 2007)。词汇重音发展的轨迹在希腊语和国际文献中都很少受到关注,特别是关于突出音的声学分析。因此,本研究的目的是研究希腊语习得过程中重音的声学实现。为此,24名4岁、7岁到6岁、4岁(岁、月)的正常发育儿童和24名20岁到25岁的成年人进行了一项单词重复任务,涉及20对最小重音对(15个真实单词和5个非单词)。计算了重读元音与非重读元音的相对突出度指标——持续时间、强度和F0变化。总体而言,尽管两组儿童使用强度线索提示词汇重读没有显著差异,但儿童倾向于使用元音持续时间线索提示词汇重读位置的程度低于成人。另一方面,儿童数据中的F0变异指数明显更高。此外,声学分析表明,儿童使用非重读元音的模式,这是希腊语中选择性使用的一种特定类型的元音弱化,比成年人更广泛。最后,尽管在大多数情况下,单词生产带有明确和正确的词汇重音,但在少数情况下,与成人相反,儿童在以感知透明的方式发出词汇重音位置的信号方面存在困难。本研究是描述希腊典型发展中词汇重音声学特征的少数尝试之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信