Atmospheric production of nitrous oxide from excited ozone and its significance

Sheo S. Prasad , Edward C. Zipf
{"title":"Atmospheric production of nitrous oxide from excited ozone and its significance","authors":"Sheo S. Prasad ,&nbsp;Edward C. Zipf","doi":"10.1016/S1465-9972(00)00037-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Today our understanding of the sources and sinks of nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) may be at a turning point. Currently, it is believed that there are no atmospheric photochemical sources of N<sub>2</sub>O and that microbial activity at the earth's surface (soil, lake, ocean, etc.) is the major source of atmospheric N<sub>2</sub>O. Anthropogenic activities are thought to release N<sub>2</sub>O into the atmosphere, but their magnitude is uncertain and probably minor. Here we present estimates of atmospheric production of N<sub>2</sub>O from excited ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) based on comprehensive laboratory experiments. These experiments covered a large range of pressures from 1 to 1000 torr to distinguish between the various possibilities on the basis of their pressure dependencies, and used two reaction vessels of widely varying surface-to-volume ratios to distinguish between surface and gas phase reactions. Never before in the history of the experimental studies of N<sub>2</sub>O under atmospherically significant conditions has such a comprehensive coverage of the parameter space been attempted. From this data, the atmospheric production is substantial, being around 40% of its “classical” source strength. In order to put the atmospheric production in proper perspective, we also present those considerations that led us to look into the atmospheric sources. If we accept the IPCC’s 1990 position on the N<sub>2</sub>O source-sink inventory, then the atmospheric production of N<sub>2</sub>O bridges the source deficits. On the other hand, if the later IPCC positions of a nearly balanced inventory is accepted, then the new source means that either the post-1990 IPCC methodology for establishing national inventories of greenhouse gas emissions overestimates N<sub>2</sub>O emissions or there exists some hitherto unrecognized sinks of N<sub>2</sub>O.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100235,"journal":{"name":"Chemosphere - Global Change Science","volume":"2 3","pages":"Pages 235-245"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1465-9972(00)00037-4","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemosphere - Global Change Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1465997200000374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Today our understanding of the sources and sinks of nitrous oxide (N2O) may be at a turning point. Currently, it is believed that there are no atmospheric photochemical sources of N2O and that microbial activity at the earth's surface (soil, lake, ocean, etc.) is the major source of atmospheric N2O. Anthropogenic activities are thought to release N2O into the atmosphere, but their magnitude is uncertain and probably minor. Here we present estimates of atmospheric production of N2O from excited ozone (O3) based on comprehensive laboratory experiments. These experiments covered a large range of pressures from 1 to 1000 torr to distinguish between the various possibilities on the basis of their pressure dependencies, and used two reaction vessels of widely varying surface-to-volume ratios to distinguish between surface and gas phase reactions. Never before in the history of the experimental studies of N2O under atmospherically significant conditions has such a comprehensive coverage of the parameter space been attempted. From this data, the atmospheric production is substantial, being around 40% of its “classical” source strength. In order to put the atmospheric production in proper perspective, we also present those considerations that led us to look into the atmospheric sources. If we accept the IPCC’s 1990 position on the N2O source-sink inventory, then the atmospheric production of N2O bridges the source deficits. On the other hand, if the later IPCC positions of a nearly balanced inventory is accepted, then the new source means that either the post-1990 IPCC methodology for establishing national inventories of greenhouse gas emissions overestimates N2O emissions or there exists some hitherto unrecognized sinks of N2O.

受激臭氧在大气中产生氧化亚氮及其意义
今天,我们对一氧化二氮(N2O)的来源和汇的理解可能正处于一个转折点。目前认为大气中不存在N2O的光化学来源,地球表面(土壤、湖泊、海洋等)的微生物活动是大气N2O的主要来源。人类活动被认为向大气中释放了一氧化二氮,但其强度不确定,可能很小。在这里,我们提出了基于综合实验室实验的受激臭氧(O3)在大气中产生N2O的估计。这些实验涵盖了从1到1000托的大范围压力,以根据其压力依赖性来区分各种可能性,并使用两个表面积与体积比变化很大的反应容器来区分表面和气相反应。在大气显著条件下的N2O实验研究历史上,从未尝试过如此全面地覆盖参数空间。从这些数据来看,大气产生的能量是巨大的,大约是其“经典”源强度的40%。为了正确地看待大气的产生,我们还提出了导致我们研究大气源的那些考虑。如果我们接受IPCC 1990年关于N2O源汇清单的立场,那么大气中N2O的产生弥补了源赤字。另一方面,如果接受IPCC后来关于接近平衡清单的立场,那么新的来源意味着,要么是1990年后IPCC建立国家温室气体排放清单的方法高估了N2O排放量,要么是存在一些迄今为止未被认识到的N2O汇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信