Topical anesthesia with sedation in phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation combined with 2-port pars plana vitrectomy in 105 consecutive cases.

J. Yepez, J. D. de Yepez, O. Azar-Arevalo, J. F. Arevalo
{"title":"Topical anesthesia with sedation in phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation combined with 2-port pars plana vitrectomy in 105 consecutive cases.","authors":"J. Yepez, J. D. de Yepez, O. Azar-Arevalo, J. F. Arevalo","doi":"10.3928/1542-8877-20020701-07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE\nTo evaluate the efficacy of topical anesthesia as an alternative to peribulbar or retrobulbar anesthesia in phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation combined with our modified 2-port pars plana vitrectomy technique (phacovitrectomy).\n\n\nPATIENTS AND METHODS\nPhacovitrectomy using topical anesthesia (4% lidocaine drops) was prospectively performed in 105 eyes with cataract and varied vitreoretinal pathology. In 75 eyes (71.4%), phacovitrectomy was combined with argon laser photocoagulation (endolaser). Preoperative and intraoperative sedation of varying degrees was necessary. Subjective pain and discomfort were graded from 1 (no pain or discomfort) to 4 (severe pain and discomfort).\n\n\nRESULTS\nAll patients had grade 1 pain and discomfort during most of the procedure. All patients had grade 2 (mild) pain and discomfort during pars plana sclerotomies, external bipolar cautery, and conjunctival closure. No patient required additional retrobulbar, peribulbar, or sub-Tenon's anesthesia.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThis technique avoids the risk of globe perforation, retrobulbar hemorrhage, and prolonged postoperative akinesia of the eye. With appropriate case selection, topical anesthesia is a safe and effective alternative to peribulbar or retrobulbar anesthesia in phacovitrectomy.","PeriodicalId":19509,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic surgery and lasers","volume":"64 1","pages":"293-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic surgery and lasers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1542-8877-20020701-07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of topical anesthesia as an alternative to peribulbar or retrobulbar anesthesia in phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation combined with our modified 2-port pars plana vitrectomy technique (phacovitrectomy). PATIENTS AND METHODS Phacovitrectomy using topical anesthesia (4% lidocaine drops) was prospectively performed in 105 eyes with cataract and varied vitreoretinal pathology. In 75 eyes (71.4%), phacovitrectomy was combined with argon laser photocoagulation (endolaser). Preoperative and intraoperative sedation of varying degrees was necessary. Subjective pain and discomfort were graded from 1 (no pain or discomfort) to 4 (severe pain and discomfort). RESULTS All patients had grade 1 pain and discomfort during most of the procedure. All patients had grade 2 (mild) pain and discomfort during pars plana sclerotomies, external bipolar cautery, and conjunctival closure. No patient required additional retrobulbar, peribulbar, or sub-Tenon's anesthesia. CONCLUSION This technique avoids the risk of globe perforation, retrobulbar hemorrhage, and prolonged postoperative akinesia of the eye. With appropriate case selection, topical anesthesia is a safe and effective alternative to peribulbar or retrobulbar anesthesia in phacovitrectomy.
表面麻醉加镇静在超声乳化人工晶状体植入术中联合2孔玻璃体切除105例。
背景与目的评价表面麻醉作为球周或球后麻醉的替代方案在超声乳化和人工晶状体植入术中联合我们改良的2孔玻璃体切割技术(超声玻璃体切除术)的疗效。患者与方法采用表面麻醉(4%利多卡因滴剂)对105只白内障伴不同类型玻璃体视网膜病变的眼行睫状体切除术。75眼(71.4%)白内障玻璃体切除术联合氩激光光凝术。术前及术中给予不同程度的镇静是必要的。主观疼痛和不适从1(无疼痛或不适)到4(严重疼痛和不适)分级。结果所有患者在大部分手术过程中均有1级疼痛和不适。所有患者在planpars巩膜切开术、外双极烧灼术和结膜闭合时均有2级(轻度)疼痛和不适。没有患者需要额外的球后、球周或亚腱麻醉。结论该技术避免了眼球穿孔、球后出血和术后眼动障碍延长的风险。在适当的病例选择下,表面麻醉是一种安全有效的替代球周或球后麻醉的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信