Exploring how cultural and structural elements relate to communal coping for separated Latina/o/x immigrant families

IF 0.8 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Roselia Mendez Murillo, Jennifer A. Kam
{"title":"Exploring how cultural and structural elements relate to communal coping for separated Latina/o/x immigrant families","authors":"Roselia Mendez Murillo, Jennifer A. Kam","doi":"10.1093/joc/jqac048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Family immigration-related separation is incredibly stressful; however, Latina/o/x separated families might engage in communal coping to help mitigate those stressors. Utilizing the extended theoretical model of communal coping, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 family triads (i.e., separated parent, separated child, primary caregiver) who were experiencing or had recently experienced immigration-related family separation. We explored cultural and structural elements associated with communally or individually coping, and we considered why family members, all of whom experienced separation stress, might cope differently. Among the different types of family members, gender norms were related to communally coping, relying on extended family for support, and protective buffering. Physical distance, as well as limited technology access and literacy also hindered communal coping. When exploring within-family-triad experiences, three themes were apparent: (a) one-sided communal coping, (b) protective buffering at the cost of one’s own needs, and (c) communal coping impeded by relational strain. Our findings emphasize the importance of considering the multidimensional nature of a stressor (i.e., family separation) when determining whether people are communally coping; how cultural and structural elements relate to coping; and including multiple family members’ perspectives.","PeriodicalId":53925,"journal":{"name":"Fonseca-Journal of Communication","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fonseca-Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Family immigration-related separation is incredibly stressful; however, Latina/o/x separated families might engage in communal coping to help mitigate those stressors. Utilizing the extended theoretical model of communal coping, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 family triads (i.e., separated parent, separated child, primary caregiver) who were experiencing or had recently experienced immigration-related family separation. We explored cultural and structural elements associated with communally or individually coping, and we considered why family members, all of whom experienced separation stress, might cope differently. Among the different types of family members, gender norms were related to communally coping, relying on extended family for support, and protective buffering. Physical distance, as well as limited technology access and literacy also hindered communal coping. When exploring within-family-triad experiences, three themes were apparent: (a) one-sided communal coping, (b) protective buffering at the cost of one’s own needs, and (c) communal coping impeded by relational strain. Our findings emphasize the importance of considering the multidimensional nature of a stressor (i.e., family separation) when determining whether people are communally coping; how cultural and structural elements relate to coping; and including multiple family members’ perspectives.
探索文化和结构因素如何与分离的拉丁/o/x移民家庭的公共应对有关
与家庭移民有关的分离是令人难以置信的压力;然而,拉丁/o/x离散家庭可能会参与共同应对,以帮助减轻这些压力源。利用公共应对的扩展理论模型,我们对20个正在经历或最近经历过与移民有关的家庭分离的家庭三元组(即分离的父母、分离的孩子、主要照顾者)进行了半结构化访谈。我们探索了与集体或个人应对相关的文化和结构因素,并考虑了为什么所有经历过分离压力的家庭成员可能会以不同的方式应对。在不同类型的家庭成员中,性别规范与社区应对、依赖大家庭支持和保护性缓冲有关。物理距离,以及有限的技术获取和读写能力也阻碍了社区应对。当探索家庭三合一的经历时,有三个主题是明显的:(a)片面的共同应对,(b)以自己的需求为代价的保护性缓冲,以及(c)受关系紧张阻碍的共同应对。我们的研究结果强调了在确定人们是否能够共同应对时,考虑压力源(即家庭分离)的多维性的重要性;文化和结构因素如何影响应对;包括多个家庭成员的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信