The framing effect of the media in the regulation of GMOs: a case study of Russia

Q1 Social Sciences
Eleni Galata Bickell
{"title":"The framing effect of the media in the regulation of GMOs: a case study of Russia","authors":"Eleni Galata Bickell","doi":"10.1080/19409419.2019.1678348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Despite the rapid adoption of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) in agriculture, countries like Russia, have developed restrictive procedures for their approval (i.e. mandatory labeling). The country, which recently banned GMOs, had a relatively approving regulation up until 2010. In order to provide context to the 2016 GMOs ban, this paper examines whether there was a media-framing effect, before and after the 2010 regulation shift. The findings suggest that before 2010, the tone was more positive, and it became more negative during the years leading to the 2016 ban. Additionally, the frames describing GMOs also changed from emphasizing Science and Business to focusing on Concerns. Since only the changes in Frames were significant, our work suggests that media-related factors, and other economic and political factors may have influenced the major policy shift in 2016 – from being more accessible in 2010 to becoming more restrictive in 2016. Our findings add to the literature of the inter-relationship of the mass media coverage and the regulation around GMOs.","PeriodicalId":53456,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Communication","volume":"23 11 1","pages":"240 - 252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19409419.2019.1678348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Despite the rapid adoption of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) in agriculture, countries like Russia, have developed restrictive procedures for their approval (i.e. mandatory labeling). The country, which recently banned GMOs, had a relatively approving regulation up until 2010. In order to provide context to the 2016 GMOs ban, this paper examines whether there was a media-framing effect, before and after the 2010 regulation shift. The findings suggest that before 2010, the tone was more positive, and it became more negative during the years leading to the 2016 ban. Additionally, the frames describing GMOs also changed from emphasizing Science and Business to focusing on Concerns. Since only the changes in Frames were significant, our work suggests that media-related factors, and other economic and political factors may have influenced the major policy shift in 2016 – from being more accessible in 2010 to becoming more restrictive in 2016. Our findings add to the literature of the inter-relationship of the mass media coverage and the regulation around GMOs.
媒体在转基因生物监管中的框架效应:以俄罗斯为例
尽管转基因生物(GMOs)在农业中的应用迅速,但像俄罗斯这样的国家已经制定了限制性的批准程序(即强制性标签)。该国最近禁止了转基因生物,直到2010年才出台了相对批准的法规。为了提供2016年转基因生物禁令的背景,本文考察了在2010年监管转变之前和之后是否存在媒体框架效应。研究结果表明,在2010年之前,人们的语气更为积极,而在2016年禁令出台前的几年里,人们的语气变得更加消极。此外,描述转基因生物的框架也从强调科学和商业转变为关注问题。由于只有框架的变化是显著的,我们的研究表明,媒体相关因素以及其他经济和政治因素可能影响了2016年的主要政策转变——从2010年的更容易获得到2016年的更严格限制。我们的发现增加了大众媒体报道与转基因生物监管之间相互关系的文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Russian Journal of Communication
Russian Journal of Communication Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Russian Journal of Communication (RJC) is an international peer-reviewed academic publication devoted to studies of communication in, with, and about Russia and Russian-speaking communities around the world. RJC welcomes both humanistic and social scientific scholarly approaches to communication, which is broadly construed to include mediated information as well as face-to-face interactions. RJC seeks papers and book reviews on topics including philosophy of communication, traditional and new media, film, literature, rhetoric, journalism, information-communication technologies, cultural practices, organizational and group dynamics, interpersonal communication, communication in instructional contexts, advertising, public relations, political campaigns, legal proceedings, environmental and health matters, and communication policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信