Legal Privilege Legislation: Consequences for Patient Safety.

Q3 Medicine
Robson Robert, C. Canfield, D. Horn, Allison Kooijman, N. Oelke, S. Sheps, Ryan Sidorchuk, Fiona MacDonald
{"title":"Legal Privilege Legislation: Consequences for Patient Safety.","authors":"Robson Robert, C. Canfield, D. Horn, Allison Kooijman, N. Oelke, S. Sheps, Ryan Sidorchuk, Fiona MacDonald","doi":"10.12927/hcq.2022.26811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasing awareness of the extent of preventable harm from healthcare has led to efforts to improve patient safety through a variety of efforts, including legislation. Extending legal privilege to quality and safety reviews leads to further harm for many patients, families and healthcare providers. The intentional isolation, silencing and exclusion after the incident undermines trust, prevents learning and impedes an opportunity to heal and recover for all those directly involved. Our case study examines Section 51 of British Columbia's Evidence Act (1996) and concludes that amending this legislation is an urgent and necessary step toward trauma-informed care.","PeriodicalId":39763,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare quarterly (Toronto, Ont.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare quarterly (Toronto, Ont.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcq.2022.26811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Increasing awareness of the extent of preventable harm from healthcare has led to efforts to improve patient safety through a variety of efforts, including legislation. Extending legal privilege to quality and safety reviews leads to further harm for many patients, families and healthcare providers. The intentional isolation, silencing and exclusion after the incident undermines trust, prevents learning and impedes an opportunity to heal and recover for all those directly involved. Our case study examines Section 51 of British Columbia's Evidence Act (1996) and concludes that amending this legislation is an urgent and necessary step toward trauma-informed care.
法律特权立法:对患者安全的影响。
人们越来越认识到医疗保健可预防伤害的程度,从而通过各种努力(包括立法)努力改善患者安全。将法律特权扩展到质量和安全审查会对许多患者、家属和医疗保健提供者造成进一步的伤害。事件发生后故意孤立、沉默和排斥破坏了信任,阻碍了学习,并阻碍了所有直接相关人员康复和康复的机会。我们的案例研究考察了不列颠哥伦比亚省证据法案(1996)的第51条,并得出结论,修改这一立法是朝着创伤知情护理迈出的紧迫而必要的一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare quarterly (Toronto, Ont.)
Healthcare quarterly (Toronto, Ont.) Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Governing boards of healthcare organizations in Canada are accountable for the performance of their organization and provide oversight on their decisions. Traditionally, many healthcare boards have focused on finances and community relations and have deferred responsibility for quality of care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信