Adaptation of the legal regulation of labor, civil, tax relations to the gig economy

IF 0.3 Q4 LAW
S. Mironova, D. V. Kozhemyakin, A. Ponomarchenko
{"title":"Adaptation of the legal regulation of labor, civil, tax relations to the gig economy","authors":"S. Mironova, D. V. Kozhemyakin, A. Ponomarchenko","doi":"10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(4).314-329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of the article is impact the gig economy to the legal regulation of labor, civil, tax relations.The purpose of the article is to identify the problems of legal regulation of relations between gig workers and digital platforms in the gig economy and suggest ways to improve it.The methodology includes systematic approach, comparative method, formal-logical method, formal-legal method, analysis, synthesis.The main results of the research. The transition from a “classic” industrial employment relationship between an employer and an employee to one based on the gig economy, using digital platforms to link the employee to their job, has created problems in classifying employment arrangements in labor law. In the current situation, the state needs to do a lot of work: (1) the sphere of the gig economy requires the compilation of clear terminology, as well as the analysis and identification of the functions of digital platforms and gig workers, then it requires amendments to labor legislation; (2) it is necessary to develop criteria for gig workers or independent contractors, one of the criteria can be proposed: the performance of work by a gig worker without the control of the hiring firm. The hiring firm's control should be limited to accepting or rejecting the results a gig worker achieves, not how they achieve them; (3) It is necessary to delimit the sphere of regulation of hired labor from the sphere of regulation of gig-employment, to withdraw gig-employment from the regulation of labor legislation.An analysis of the current legislation and law enforcement practice shows that the cornerstone of legal regulation in the field of the gig economy is the issue of legal registration of relations between digital platforms and their partners. Thus, with a rigid approach that identifies these relations with labor relations, the gig economy loses its specificity, digital platforms lose their competitive advantages in many ways, and in some cases, their ability to function. At the same time, the current relations in the field of employment of individuals on digital platforms allow us to speak about the presence of certain differences between such relations and labor relations, which are manifested mainly in greater freedom on the side of the \"employee\" and less control on the part of the employer – the digital platform, and also the unstable nature of this form of employment and its subsidiarity to more traditional forms. The specificity of the relationship between platforms and its counterparties also raises the question of the need to reform the provisions on civil liability, aimed at formulating special grounds for the responsibility of digital platforms, the distribution of this responsibility between them and their partners. Such provisions may be based on the existing norms on the liability of the employer for harm caused by his employee.Conclusions. The change of labor relations between employees and the employer to the relationship between the digital platform and gig workers predetermines the transformation of tax legal relations, in terms of the following aspects: what taxes should a gig worker pay, should there be any special tax regime; how the issue of paying insurance premiums should be resolved, whether they should be mandatory or voluntary; what role digital platforms will play in tax relations, whether they should act as tax agents or data providers; what requirements for gig workers, as taxpayers, should be imposed by tax legislation in terms of record keeping and reporting; how tax control should be exercised over gig workers and digital platforms. ","PeriodicalId":40342,"journal":{"name":"Pravoprimenenie-Law Enforcement Review","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pravoprimenenie-Law Enforcement Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(4).314-329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subject of the article is impact the gig economy to the legal regulation of labor, civil, tax relations.The purpose of the article is to identify the problems of legal regulation of relations between gig workers and digital platforms in the gig economy and suggest ways to improve it.The methodology includes systematic approach, comparative method, formal-logical method, formal-legal method, analysis, synthesis.The main results of the research. The transition from a “classic” industrial employment relationship between an employer and an employee to one based on the gig economy, using digital platforms to link the employee to their job, has created problems in classifying employment arrangements in labor law. In the current situation, the state needs to do a lot of work: (1) the sphere of the gig economy requires the compilation of clear terminology, as well as the analysis and identification of the functions of digital platforms and gig workers, then it requires amendments to labor legislation; (2) it is necessary to develop criteria for gig workers or independent contractors, one of the criteria can be proposed: the performance of work by a gig worker without the control of the hiring firm. The hiring firm's control should be limited to accepting or rejecting the results a gig worker achieves, not how they achieve them; (3) It is necessary to delimit the sphere of regulation of hired labor from the sphere of regulation of gig-employment, to withdraw gig-employment from the regulation of labor legislation.An analysis of the current legislation and law enforcement practice shows that the cornerstone of legal regulation in the field of the gig economy is the issue of legal registration of relations between digital platforms and their partners. Thus, with a rigid approach that identifies these relations with labor relations, the gig economy loses its specificity, digital platforms lose their competitive advantages in many ways, and in some cases, their ability to function. At the same time, the current relations in the field of employment of individuals on digital platforms allow us to speak about the presence of certain differences between such relations and labor relations, which are manifested mainly in greater freedom on the side of the "employee" and less control on the part of the employer – the digital platform, and also the unstable nature of this form of employment and its subsidiarity to more traditional forms. The specificity of the relationship between platforms and its counterparties also raises the question of the need to reform the provisions on civil liability, aimed at formulating special grounds for the responsibility of digital platforms, the distribution of this responsibility between them and their partners. Such provisions may be based on the existing norms on the liability of the employer for harm caused by his employee.Conclusions. The change of labor relations between employees and the employer to the relationship between the digital platform and gig workers predetermines the transformation of tax legal relations, in terms of the following aspects: what taxes should a gig worker pay, should there be any special tax regime; how the issue of paying insurance premiums should be resolved, whether they should be mandatory or voluntary; what role digital platforms will play in tax relations, whether they should act as tax agents or data providers; what requirements for gig workers, as taxpayers, should be imposed by tax legislation in terms of record keeping and reporting; how tax control should be exercised over gig workers and digital platforms. 
适应零工经济对劳动、民事、税务关系的法律规制
本文的主题是零工经济对劳动、民事、税务关系的法律规制的影响。本文的目的是确定零工经济中零工工人与数字平台之间关系的法律监管问题,并提出改进方法。方法论包括系统法、比较法、形式-逻辑法、形式-法律法、分析法、综合法。本研究的主要成果。从雇主和雇员之间的“经典”工业雇佣关系转变为基于零工经济的雇佣关系,利用数字平台将雇员与他们的工作联系起来,这在劳动法中对雇佣安排进行分类方面产生了问题。在目前的情况下,国家需要做的工作有很多:(1)零工经济领域需要编写明确的术语,以及对数字平台和零工工人的功能进行分析和识别,然后需要修改劳动立法;(2)有必要制定零工或独立承包商的标准,其中一个标准可以提出:在没有招聘公司控制的情况下,零工工人的工作表现。招聘公司的控制权应该局限于接受或拒绝零工员工取得的成果,而不是他们如何取得这些成果;(3)有必要将雇佣劳动的规制范围与零工就业的规制范围划清界限,将零工就业从劳动立法规制中抽离出来。对当前立法和执法实践的分析表明,零工经济领域法律监管的基石是数字平台及其合作伙伴之间关系的法律登记问题。因此,如果将这些关系与劳动关系等同起来,那么零工经济就失去了特殊性,数字平台在许多方面失去了竞争优势,在某些情况下失去了运作能力。同时,从目前数字平台上个人雇佣领域的关系来看,这种关系与劳动关系存在着一定的差异,主要表现在“雇员”一方拥有更大的自由,而雇主——数字平台的控制更少,同时这种雇佣形式的不稳定性及其对更传统形式的从属性。平台及其交易对手之间关系的特殊性也提出了需要改革民事责任规定的问题,旨在为数字平台的责任制定特殊理由,并在它们及其合作伙伴之间分配这种责任。这种规定可以根据雇主对其雇员所造成损害的责任的现行规范。从员工与雇主之间的劳动关系到数字平台与零工之间的劳动关系的变化,预先决定了税收法律关系的转变,具体表现在以下几个方面:零工应该缴纳哪些税,是否有特殊的税收制度;如何解决缴纳保险费的问题,是强制缴纳还是自愿缴纳;数字平台将在税收关系中扮演什么角色,它们应该充当税务代理还是数据提供者;税收立法应该在记录保存和报告方面对作为纳税人的零工工人提出哪些要求?如何对零工和数字平台实施税收管制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
66.70%
发文量
79
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信