Investigation of Archiving Techniques for Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimizers

H. Medeiros, E. Goldbarg, M. Goldbarg
{"title":"Investigation of Archiving Techniques for Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimizers","authors":"H. Medeiros, E. Goldbarg, M. Goldbarg","doi":"10.22456/2175-2745.80478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:  The optimization of multi-objective problems from the Pareto dominance viewpoint can lead to huge sets of incomparable solutions. Many heuristic techniques proposed to these problems have to deal with approximation sets that can be limited or not. Usually, a new solution generated by a heuristic is compared with other archived non-dominated solutions generated previously. Many techniques deal with limited size archives, since comparisons within unlimited archives may require significant computational effort. To maintain limited archives, solutions need to be discarded. Several techniques were proposed to deal with the problem of deciding which solutions remain in the archive and which are discarded. Previous investigations showed that those techniques might not prevent deterioration of the archives. In this study, we propose to store discarded solutions in a secondary archive and, periodically, recycle them, bringing them back to the optimization process. Three recycling techniques were investigated for three known methods. The datasets for the experiments consisted of 91 instances of discrete and continuous problems with 2, 3 and 4 objectives. The results showed that the recycling method can benefit the tested optimizers on many problem classes.","PeriodicalId":82472,"journal":{"name":"Research initiative, treatment action : RITA","volume":"6 1","pages":"11-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research initiative, treatment action : RITA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22456/2175-2745.80478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:  The optimization of multi-objective problems from the Pareto dominance viewpoint can lead to huge sets of incomparable solutions. Many heuristic techniques proposed to these problems have to deal with approximation sets that can be limited or not. Usually, a new solution generated by a heuristic is compared with other archived non-dominated solutions generated previously. Many techniques deal with limited size archives, since comparisons within unlimited archives may require significant computational effort. To maintain limited archives, solutions need to be discarded. Several techniques were proposed to deal with the problem of deciding which solutions remain in the archive and which are discarded. Previous investigations showed that those techniques might not prevent deterioration of the archives. In this study, we propose to store discarded solutions in a secondary archive and, periodically, recycle them, bringing them back to the optimization process. Three recycling techniques were investigated for three known methods. The datasets for the experiments consisted of 91 instances of discrete and continuous problems with 2, 3 and 4 objectives. The results showed that the recycling method can benefit the tested optimizers on many problem classes.
进化多目标优化器归档技术研究
摘要:基于Pareto优势的多目标优化问题会产生巨大的不可比较解集。针对这些问题提出的许多启发式技术必须处理可能有限或不有限的近似集。通常,由启发式生成的新解与先前生成的其他存档的非主导解进行比较。许多技术处理有限大小的档案,因为在无限的档案中进行比较可能需要大量的计算工作。为了维护有限的档案,解决方案需要被丢弃。提出了几种技术来处理决定哪些解决方案保留在存档中,哪些解决方案被丢弃的问题。以前的调查表明,这些技术可能无法防止档案的恶化。在本研究中,我们建议将丢弃的解存储在二级存档中,并定期回收它们,将它们带回优化过程。对三种已知方法进行了三种回收技术的研究。实验的数据集包括91个离散和连续问题的实例,分别有2、3和4个目标。结果表明,循环方法可以使被测试的优化器在许多问题类上受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信