Long-Term Dynamics of Institutions: Using ABM as a Complementary Tool to Support Theory Development in Historical Studies

M. Dehkordi, A. Ghorbani, Giangiacomo Bravo, M. Farjam, R. V. Weeren, Anders Forsman, T. Moor
{"title":"Long-Term Dynamics of Institutions: Using ABM as a Complementary Tool to Support Theory Development in Historical Studies","authors":"M. Dehkordi, A. Ghorbani, Giangiacomo Bravo, M. Farjam, R. V. Weeren, Anders Forsman, T. Moor","doi":"10.18564/jasss.4706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Historical data are valuable resources for providing insights into general sociological patterns in the past. However, thesedataofteninformusatthemacro-levelofanalysisbutnotabouttheroleofindividuals’behavioursin the emergence of long-term patterns. Therefore, it is difficult to infer ‘how’ and ‘why’ certain patterns emerged in the past. Historians use various methods to draw hypotheses about the underlying reasons for emerging patterns and trends, but since the patterns are the results of hundreds if not thousands of years of human behaviour, these hypotheses can never be tested in reality. Our proposition is that simulation models and specifically, agent-based models (ABMs) can be used as complementary tools in historical studies to support hypothesis building. The approach that we propose and test in this paper is to design and configure models in such a way as to generate historical patterns, consequently aiming to find individual-level explanations for the emerging pattern. In this work, we use an existing, empirically validated, agent-based model of common pool resource management to test hypotheses formulated based on a historical dataset. We first investigate whether the model can replicate various patterns observed in the dataset, and second, whether it can contribute to a better understanding of the underlying mechanism that led to the observed empirical trends. We showcase how ABM can be used as a complementary tool to support theory development in historical studies. Finally, we provide some guidelines for using ABM as a tool to test historical hypotheses","PeriodicalId":14675,"journal":{"name":"J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.4706","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Historical data are valuable resources for providing insights into general sociological patterns in the past. However, thesedataofteninformusatthemacro-levelofanalysisbutnotabouttheroleofindividuals’behavioursin the emergence of long-term patterns. Therefore, it is difficult to infer ‘how’ and ‘why’ certain patterns emerged in the past. Historians use various methods to draw hypotheses about the underlying reasons for emerging patterns and trends, but since the patterns are the results of hundreds if not thousands of years of human behaviour, these hypotheses can never be tested in reality. Our proposition is that simulation models and specifically, agent-based models (ABMs) can be used as complementary tools in historical studies to support hypothesis building. The approach that we propose and test in this paper is to design and configure models in such a way as to generate historical patterns, consequently aiming to find individual-level explanations for the emerging pattern. In this work, we use an existing, empirically validated, agent-based model of common pool resource management to test hypotheses formulated based on a historical dataset. We first investigate whether the model can replicate various patterns observed in the dataset, and second, whether it can contribute to a better understanding of the underlying mechanism that led to the observed empirical trends. We showcase how ABM can be used as a complementary tool to support theory development in historical studies. Finally, we provide some guidelines for using ABM as a tool to test historical hypotheses
制度的长期动态:利用ABM作为支持历史研究理论发展的补充工具
历史数据是洞察过去一般社会学模式的宝贵资源。然而,这些数据通常是宏观层面的分析,而不是关于长期模式出现时个人行为的信息。因此,很难推断过去某些模式是“如何”和“为什么”出现的。历史学家使用各种方法对新出现的模式和趋势的潜在原因提出假设,但由于这些模式是数百年(如果不是数千年的话)人类行为的结果,因此这些假设永远无法在现实中得到验证。我们的主张是,仿真模型,特别是基于主体的模型(ABMs)可以作为历史研究的补充工具,以支持假设的建立。我们在本文中提出和测试的方法是以这样一种方式来设计和配置模型,以生成历史模式,从而旨在为新出现的模式找到个人层面的解释。在这项工作中,我们使用一个现有的、经验验证的、基于代理的公共池资源管理模型来检验基于历史数据集制定的假设。我们首先研究了该模型是否可以复制数据集中观察到的各种模式,其次,它是否有助于更好地理解导致观察到的经验趋势的潜在机制。我们展示了如何将ABM作为一种辅助工具来支持历史研究中的理论发展。最后,我们提供了一些使用ABM作为工具来检验历史假设的指导方针
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信