Check Your Race in the Box Below

IF 0.3 4区 教育学 Q4 BIOLOGY
W. H. Leonard
{"title":"Check Your Race in the Box Below","authors":"W. H. Leonard","doi":"10.1525/abt.2011.73.7.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The global media regularly categorize people as members of distinct races. Many state and federal government forms ask you to identify your \"race.\" Among the popular options are \"Caucasian,\" \"Hispanic,\" \"Black,\" \"Asian,\" \"Pacific Islander,\" and \"American Indian.\" But I do not check any of those and instead write on the blank provided \"Human.\"\n\nWhy? Because all humans are one race: Homo sapiens . There is absolutely no genetic or evolutionary justification for \"racial\" categories of humans. The concept of race was conceived hundreds of years ago by whites to justify the belief that \"the white race\" was superior to others. For example, in South Africa, the apartheid movement begun in 1948 by the British and Dutch was practiced primarily to separate whites from other ethnic groups and to create a hierarchy of human superiority. This legal form of racial segregation created the categories \"white,\" \"colored\" (i.e., any mix between whites and blacks), and \"black,\" meaning native African. The presumption was that whites were superior to colored and colored superior to blacks. This ridiculous division had no genetic basis and, fortunately, ended in 1993 as a result of the brave efforts of Nelson Mandela and others. \n\nHere is the biological problem with race. The genetic variation within each of the various ethnic groups of Homo sapiens is greater than that between the various ethnic groups. We are one race, just as dogs ( Canis familiaris ), house cats ( Felis domesticus ), and horses ( Equus caballus ) are. Obviously there are many different breeds of all of these animals and they often have striking differences. (Compare a Saint Bernard with a Chihuahua for an analogy of different human ethnic groups.) Furthermore, the origin of breeds or ethnic groups is more …","PeriodicalId":50960,"journal":{"name":"American Biology Teacher","volume":"17 1","pages":"379-380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Biology Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2011.73.7.2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global media regularly categorize people as members of distinct races. Many state and federal government forms ask you to identify your "race." Among the popular options are "Caucasian," "Hispanic," "Black," "Asian," "Pacific Islander," and "American Indian." But I do not check any of those and instead write on the blank provided "Human." Why? Because all humans are one race: Homo sapiens . There is absolutely no genetic or evolutionary justification for "racial" categories of humans. The concept of race was conceived hundreds of years ago by whites to justify the belief that "the white race" was superior to others. For example, in South Africa, the apartheid movement begun in 1948 by the British and Dutch was practiced primarily to separate whites from other ethnic groups and to create a hierarchy of human superiority. This legal form of racial segregation created the categories "white," "colored" (i.e., any mix between whites and blacks), and "black," meaning native African. The presumption was that whites were superior to colored and colored superior to blacks. This ridiculous division had no genetic basis and, fortunately, ended in 1993 as a result of the brave efforts of Nelson Mandela and others. Here is the biological problem with race. The genetic variation within each of the various ethnic groups of Homo sapiens is greater than that between the various ethnic groups. We are one race, just as dogs ( Canis familiaris ), house cats ( Felis domesticus ), and horses ( Equus caballus ) are. Obviously there are many different breeds of all of these animals and they often have striking differences. (Compare a Saint Bernard with a Chihuahua for an analogy of different human ethnic groups.) Furthermore, the origin of breeds or ethnic groups is more …
请在下面的方框中勾选您的比赛
全球媒体经常将人们划分为不同的种族。许多州和联邦政府的表格要求你说明你的“种族”。受欢迎的选项包括“高加索人”、“西班牙人”、“黑人”、“亚洲人”、“太平洋岛民”和“美洲印第安人”。但我没有勾选任何一个,而是在提供的空白栏上写了“人类”,为什么?因为所有的人类都是一个种族:智人。对于人类的“种族”分类,绝对没有遗传或进化上的理由。种族的概念是几百年前白人构思出来的,用来证明“白人种族”比其他种族优越的信念是正确的。例如,在南非,1948年由英国人和荷兰人发起的种族隔离运动主要是为了将白人与其他种族群体分开,并建立一种人类优越的等级制度。这种法律形式的种族隔离造成了“白人”、“有色人种”(即白人和黑人的混血儿)和“黑人”的分类,“黑人”指的是非洲原住民。假定白人比有色人种优越,有色人种比黑人优越。这种荒谬的分裂没有遗传基础,幸运的是,由于纳尔逊·曼德拉和其他人的勇敢努力,这种分裂于1993年结束。这是种族的生物学问题。智人各民族内部的遗传变异大于各民族之间的遗传变异。我们是一个种族,就像狗(Canis familiaris)、家猫(Felis domesticus)和马(Equus caballus)一样。很明显,所有这些动物都有许多不同的品种,它们往往有显著的差异。(比较一下圣伯纳犬和吉娃娃,就可以类比不同的人类族群。)此外,品种或族群的起源更…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Biology Teacher
American Biology Teacher BIOLOGY-EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: The American Biology Teacher is an award winning and peer-refereed professional journal for K-16 biology teachers. Articles include topics such as modern biology content, biology teaching strategies for both the classroom and laboratory, field activities, and a wide range of assistance for application and professional development. Each issue features reviews of books, classroom technology products, and "Biology Today." Published 9 times a year, the journal also covers the social and ethical implications of biology and ways to incorporate such concerns into instructional programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信