On the slow implementation of pilot projects: Suspected causes from the perspective of statutory health insurance funds / Zur zögerlichen Umsetzung von Modellvorhaben: vermutete Ursachen aus Sicht der gesetzlichen Krankenkassen

M. Wessels, Dorith Geuen
{"title":"On the slow implementation of pilot projects: Suspected causes from the perspective of statutory health insurance funds / Zur zögerlichen Umsetzung von Modellvorhaben: vermutete Ursachen aus Sicht der gesetzlichen Krankenkassen","authors":"M. Wessels, Dorith Geuen","doi":"10.2478/ijhp-2018-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background The system of nursing care in Germany is currently changing. For years, a further development of cooperation in the health care sector has been discussed. And thus a change in the distribution of tasks between health care professions. In 2008, the legislature introduced the introduction of pilot projects for the transfer of medicinal tasks to nurses according to § 63 para. 3c Social Code V. The implementation is very sluggish. The aim of the study was to analyze the reasons for this sluggish implementation from the perspective of the statutory health insurance funds. Methods Quantitative survey of all statutory health insurance funds (n=124) in Germany. Results To ensure supply, 94 % of health insurance companies consider the transfer of medical tasks to non-medical care providers as a sensible approach. Also 96 % consider this to be very important in order to ensure care. Although 96 % of health insurance funds support the implementation of pilot projects, only 8 % are in fact involved in such contracts; 71 % do not plan own pilot projects for the future. In the view of the statutory health insurance funds, legal obstacles (90 %), resistance by medical representatives (84 %), unresolved financing (74 %) and liability issues (70 %) as well as non-applicable regulations in G-BA-directive (79 %) and the law (85 %). Less than half (46 %) of the health insurance companies suspect high costs causing the slow implementation. Discussion The amendments adopted by the legislature in the current reform of the law on care professions can be described as appropriate; in particular the fact that statutory health insurance funds should implement and carry out appropriate pilot projects by 31 December 2020.","PeriodicalId":91706,"journal":{"name":"International journal of health professions","volume":"200 1","pages":"64 - 71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of health professions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ijhp-2018-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background The system of nursing care in Germany is currently changing. For years, a further development of cooperation in the health care sector has been discussed. And thus a change in the distribution of tasks between health care professions. In 2008, the legislature introduced the introduction of pilot projects for the transfer of medicinal tasks to nurses according to § 63 para. 3c Social Code V. The implementation is very sluggish. The aim of the study was to analyze the reasons for this sluggish implementation from the perspective of the statutory health insurance funds. Methods Quantitative survey of all statutory health insurance funds (n=124) in Germany. Results To ensure supply, 94 % of health insurance companies consider the transfer of medical tasks to non-medical care providers as a sensible approach. Also 96 % consider this to be very important in order to ensure care. Although 96 % of health insurance funds support the implementation of pilot projects, only 8 % are in fact involved in such contracts; 71 % do not plan own pilot projects for the future. In the view of the statutory health insurance funds, legal obstacles (90 %), resistance by medical representatives (84 %), unresolved financing (74 %) and liability issues (70 %) as well as non-applicable regulations in G-BA-directive (79 %) and the law (85 %). Less than half (46 %) of the health insurance companies suspect high costs causing the slow implementation. Discussion The amendments adopted by the legislature in the current reform of the law on care professions can be described as appropriate; in particular the fact that statutory health insurance funds should implement and carry out appropriate pilot projects by 31 December 2020.
关于试点项目执行缓慢:从法定健康保险基金的角度看可疑的原因/ Zur zögerlichen国家健康保险基金委员会:vermutete Ursachen aus Sicht der gesetzlichen Krankenkassen
摘要背景德国的护理体系正在发生变化。多年来,双方一直在讨论进一步发展卫生保健部门的合作。因此,医疗保健专业之间的任务分配发生了变化。2008年,立法机关根据第63条第1款引入了将医疗任务移交给护士的试点项目。3c社会准则五、执行迟缓。本研究的目的是从法定医疗保险基金的角度分析这种执行迟缓的原因。方法对德国124家法定医疗保险基金进行定量调查。结果94%的健康保险公司认为将医疗任务转移给非医疗服务提供者是保证医疗服务供应的合理途径。96%的人认为这是非常重要的,以确保护理。虽然96%的健康保险基金支持试点项目的实施,但实际上只有8%参与了这类合同;71%的受访者没有为未来规划自己的试点项目。在法定健康保险基金方面,存在法律障碍(90%)、医疗代表的抵制(84%)、未解决的融资问题(74%)和责任问题(70%),以及不适用g - ba指令中的规定(79%)和法律(85%)。不到一半(46%)的健康保险公司怀疑高成本导致实施缓慢。立法会在现行护理专业法例改革中所采纳的修订,可以说是适当的;特别是法定医疗保险基金应在2020年12月31日前实施和开展适当的试点项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信