Evaluating Perception of Farmers towards the Health Effect of Pesticides: A Cross- Sectional Study in the Oil Palm Plantations of Papar, Malaysia

Shameer Khan, Y. Ibrahim, M. S. Jeffree
{"title":"Evaluating Perception of Farmers towards the Health Effect of Pesticides: A Cross- Sectional Study in the Oil Palm Plantations of Papar, Malaysia","authors":"Shameer Khan, Y. Ibrahim, M. S. Jeffree","doi":"10.4172/2329-955X.1000196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: \nAgriculture is an important occupation in Malaysia that generates a major portion of the national revenue. Similar to elsewhere in the world, pesticides are used to boost agricultural production in Malaysian farms. However, chemical pesticides are associated with human health hazard and are not environmentfriendly as they persist in nature for long periods of time. \nMaterials and methods: \nIn this cross-sectional study, we surveyed 19 palm oil plantations in the Sabah district of Malaysia and evaluated the perception of the workers towards pesticide use and their awareness regarding the health effects associated with pesticide exposure. \nResults and discussion: \nOur analysis shows that most of the workers among the 270 respondents were 30-year-old males with average education, and belonged to the low income group. Majority opined that they were aware of the health hazards of pesticide use and suffered from symptoms (with mean duration of three days) such as vomiting, diarrhea, skin irritation, and dizziness. Surprisingly, the opinion was almost equally divided on whether they perceived pesticides to be the cause of their health problems, and a major percentage did not avail of medical help. Most of the workers responded that they did not receive any training in pesticide handling. Interestingly, they would not read the safety material even if it was provided. \nConclusion: \nWe concluded that the farmers should also be educated about alternative and eco-friendly ways of farming. Finally, the plantation management should intervene and proactively advocate the use of safe farming practices.","PeriodicalId":16817,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plant Physiology & Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plant Physiology & Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-955X.1000196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Agriculture is an important occupation in Malaysia that generates a major portion of the national revenue. Similar to elsewhere in the world, pesticides are used to boost agricultural production in Malaysian farms. However, chemical pesticides are associated with human health hazard and are not environmentfriendly as they persist in nature for long periods of time. Materials and methods: In this cross-sectional study, we surveyed 19 palm oil plantations in the Sabah district of Malaysia and evaluated the perception of the workers towards pesticide use and their awareness regarding the health effects associated with pesticide exposure. Results and discussion: Our analysis shows that most of the workers among the 270 respondents were 30-year-old males with average education, and belonged to the low income group. Majority opined that they were aware of the health hazards of pesticide use and suffered from symptoms (with mean duration of three days) such as vomiting, diarrhea, skin irritation, and dizziness. Surprisingly, the opinion was almost equally divided on whether they perceived pesticides to be the cause of their health problems, and a major percentage did not avail of medical help. Most of the workers responded that they did not receive any training in pesticide handling. Interestingly, they would not read the safety material even if it was provided. Conclusion: We concluded that the farmers should also be educated about alternative and eco-friendly ways of farming. Finally, the plantation management should intervene and proactively advocate the use of safe farming practices.
评估农民对农药对健康影响的认知:马来西亚帕帕岛油棕种植园的横断面研究
简介:农业是马来西亚一个重要的职业,产生了国家收入的主要部分。与世界其他地方类似,马来西亚农场使用杀虫剂来提高农业产量。然而,化学农药危害人体健康,且长期存在于自然界中,不利于环境保护。材料和方法:在这项横断面研究中,我们调查了马来西亚沙巴地区的19个棕榈油种植园,并评估了工人对农药使用的看法以及他们对农药暴露对健康影响的认识。结果与讨论:我们的分析显示,在270名受访者中,大多数是30岁的男性,受教育程度一般,属于低收入群体。大多数人认为,他们意识到使用农药对健康的危害,并出现呕吐、腹泻、皮肤刺激和头晕等症状(平均持续时间为三天)。令人惊讶的是,在他们是否认为农药是他们健康问题的原因这一问题上,意见几乎平分,而且很大一部分人没有利用医疗帮助。大多数工人回答说,他们没有接受过任何农药处理方面的培训。有趣的是,即使提供了安全材料,他们也不会阅读。结论:我们的结论是,农民也应该接受关于替代和环保耕作方式的教育。最后,种植园管理部门应介入并积极倡导使用安全耕作方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信