Comparison of visual inspection and structural-health monitoring as bridge condition assessment methods

Duzgun Agdas, J. Rice, Justin Martinez, I. Lasa
{"title":"Comparison of visual inspection and structural-health monitoring as bridge condition assessment methods","authors":"Duzgun Agdas, J. Rice, Justin Martinez, I. Lasa","doi":"10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the results of a research project aimed at examining the capabilities and challenges of two distinct but not mutually exclusive approaches to in-service bridge assessment: visual inspection and installed monitoring systems. In this study, the intended functionality of both approaches was evaluated on its ability to identify potential structural damage and to provide decision-making support. Inspection and monitoring are compared in terms of their functional performance, cost, and barriers (real and perceived) to implementation. Both methods have strengths and weaknesses across the metrics analyzed, and it is likely that a hybrid evaluation technique that adopts both approaches will optimize efficiency of condition assessment and ultimately lead to better decision making.","PeriodicalId":21486,"journal":{"name":"Science & Engineering Faculty","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"113","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Engineering Faculty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 113

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a research project aimed at examining the capabilities and challenges of two distinct but not mutually exclusive approaches to in-service bridge assessment: visual inspection and installed monitoring systems. In this study, the intended functionality of both approaches was evaluated on its ability to identify potential structural damage and to provide decision-making support. Inspection and monitoring are compared in terms of their functional performance, cost, and barriers (real and perceived) to implementation. Both methods have strengths and weaknesses across the metrics analyzed, and it is likely that a hybrid evaluation technique that adopts both approaches will optimize efficiency of condition assessment and ultimately lead to better decision making.
目测与结构健康监测作为桥梁状态评估方法的比较
本文介绍了一项研究项目的结果,该项目旨在研究两种不同但并非相互排斥的在用桥梁评估方法的能力和挑战:目视检查和安装监控系统。在本研究中,对这两种方法的预期功能进行了评估,以确定潜在的结构损伤和提供决策支持的能力。检查和监视在功能性能、成本和实现障碍(实际的和可感知的)方面进行比较。两种方法在分析指标时各有优缺点,采用两种方法的混合评估技术可能会优化状态评估的效率,并最终做出更好的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信