Sex-disaggregated data matters: tracking the impact of COVID-19 on the health of women and men.

IF 1.4 4区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Economia Politica Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-20 DOI:10.1007/s40888-021-00254-4
Sarah Hawkes, Athena Pantazis, Anna Purdie, Abhishek Gautam, Sylvia Kiwuwa-Muyingo, Kent Buse, Sonja Tanaka, Kakoli Borkotoky, Sneha Sharma, Ravi Verma
{"title":"Sex-disaggregated data matters: tracking the impact of COVID-19 on the health of women and men.","authors":"Sarah Hawkes, Athena Pantazis, Anna Purdie, Abhishek Gautam, Sylvia Kiwuwa-Muyingo, Kent Buse, Sonja Tanaka, Kakoli Borkotoky, Sneha Sharma, Ravi Verma","doi":"10.1007/s40888-021-00254-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sex and gender matter to health outcomes, but despite repeated commitments to sex-disaggregate data in health policies and programmes, a persistent and substantial absence of such data remains especially in lower-income countries. This represents a missed opportunity for monitoring and identifying gender-responsive, evidence-informed solutions to address a key driver of the pandemic. In this paper we review the availability of national sex-disaggregated surveillance data on COVID-19 and examine trends on the testing-to-outcome pathway. We further analyse the availability of data according to the economic status of the country and investigate the determinants of sex differences, including the national gender inequality status (according to a global index) in each country. Results are drawn from 18 months of global data collection from over 200 countries. We find differences in COVID-19 prevention behaviours and illness outcomes by sex, with lower uptake of vaccination and testing plus an elevated risk of severe disease and death among men. Supporting and maintaining the collection, collation, interpretation and presentation of sex-disaggregated data requires commitment and resources at subnational, national and global levels, but provides an opportunity for identifying and taking gender-responsive action on health inequities. As a first step the global health community should recognise, value and support the importance of sex-disaggregated data for identifying and tackling an inequitable pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":44858,"journal":{"name":"Economia Politica","volume":"8 1","pages":"55-73"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8773398/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economia Politica","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-021-00254-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sex and gender matter to health outcomes, but despite repeated commitments to sex-disaggregate data in health policies and programmes, a persistent and substantial absence of such data remains especially in lower-income countries. This represents a missed opportunity for monitoring and identifying gender-responsive, evidence-informed solutions to address a key driver of the pandemic. In this paper we review the availability of national sex-disaggregated surveillance data on COVID-19 and examine trends on the testing-to-outcome pathway. We further analyse the availability of data according to the economic status of the country and investigate the determinants of sex differences, including the national gender inequality status (according to a global index) in each country. Results are drawn from 18 months of global data collection from over 200 countries. We find differences in COVID-19 prevention behaviours and illness outcomes by sex, with lower uptake of vaccination and testing plus an elevated risk of severe disease and death among men. Supporting and maintaining the collection, collation, interpretation and presentation of sex-disaggregated data requires commitment and resources at subnational, national and global levels, but provides an opportunity for identifying and taking gender-responsive action on health inequities. As a first step the global health community should recognise, value and support the importance of sex-disaggregated data for identifying and tackling an inequitable pandemic.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

按性别分列的数据很重要:跟踪COVID-19对男女健康的影响。
性别和社会性别对健康成果至关重要,但尽管一再承诺在卫生政策和规划中提供按性别分列的数据,但这种数据的长期和严重缺乏,特别是在低收入国家。这意味着错过了监测和确定促进性别平等和循证解决办法的机会,以解决这一大流行病的一个主要驱动因素。在本文中,我们回顾了COVID-19国家按性别分列的监测数据的可用性,并研究了从检测到结果途径的趋势。我们根据国家的经济状况进一步分析了数据的可用性,并调查了性别差异的决定因素,包括每个国家的国家性别不平等状况(根据全球指数)。结果来自于18个月来从200多个国家收集的全球数据。我们发现,不同性别的COVID-19预防行为和疾病结果存在差异,男性接种疫苗和检测的比例较低,患严重疾病和死亡的风险较高。支持和维持按性别分列的数据的收集、整理、解释和呈现,需要在次国家、国家和全球各级作出承诺并提供资源,但也提供了一个机会,可以查明卫生不平等现象并采取促进性别平等的行动。作为第一步,全球卫生界应承认、重视和支持按性别分列的数据对于查明和处理不公平的大流行病的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Economia Politica
Economia Politica ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: This journal publishes peer-reviewed articles that link theory and analysis in political economy, promoting a deeper understanding of economic realities and more effective courses of policy action. Established in 1984, the journal has kept pace with the times in disseminating high-quality and influential research aimed at establishing fruitful links between theories, approaches and institutions. With this relaunch (which combines Springer’s worldwide scientific scope with the Italian cultural roots of il Mulino and Fondazione Edison, whose research has been published by the two mentioned publishers for many years), the journal further reinforces its position in the European and international economic debate and scientific community. Furthermore, this move increases its pluralistic attention to the role that – at the micro, sectoral, and macro level – institutions and innovation play in the unfolding of economic change at different stages of development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书