Time-related processes in time-based prospective memory and in time-interval production

M. Labelle, P. Graf, S. Grondin, Laurent Gagné-Roy
{"title":"Time-related processes in time-based prospective memory and in time-interval production","authors":"M. Labelle, P. Graf, S. Grondin, Laurent Gagné-Roy","doi":"10.1080/09541440802031000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Time-based prospective memory tasks require the retrieval of previously formed plans (e.g., call me on my mobile phone) either at a specified time (e.g., at 3 p.m.) or after a specified period of time has elapsed (e.g., in 3 min). In the present study, we investigated whether the same time-related processes are recruited for a short-duration time-based prospective memory task and for a time-interval production task. In a dual-task paradigm, we required young adult participants to make category-membership decisions, while they were simultaneously engaged either in a time-based prospective memory tasks or in a time-interval production task. Under one set of conditions, participants were instructed to allocate attention equally to the two tasks, whereas in another set of conditions, they allocated attention primarily to the time-relevant task. The findings revealed that time estimates were not affected by the attention allocation manipulation, although it influenced performance on the concurrent category membership decision making task, and as expected time estimates were more accurate on the prospective memory task than on the time-production task. Based on the preponderance of the findings, we suggest that timing is managed by different mechanisms and/or strategies on time-interval production tasks and on short-duration time-based prospective memory tasks.","PeriodicalId":88321,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of cognitive psychology","volume":"21 1","pages":"501 - 521"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of cognitive psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440802031000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Time-based prospective memory tasks require the retrieval of previously formed plans (e.g., call me on my mobile phone) either at a specified time (e.g., at 3 p.m.) or after a specified period of time has elapsed (e.g., in 3 min). In the present study, we investigated whether the same time-related processes are recruited for a short-duration time-based prospective memory task and for a time-interval production task. In a dual-task paradigm, we required young adult participants to make category-membership decisions, while they were simultaneously engaged either in a time-based prospective memory tasks or in a time-interval production task. Under one set of conditions, participants were instructed to allocate attention equally to the two tasks, whereas in another set of conditions, they allocated attention primarily to the time-relevant task. The findings revealed that time estimates were not affected by the attention allocation manipulation, although it influenced performance on the concurrent category membership decision making task, and as expected time estimates were more accurate on the prospective memory task than on the time-production task. Based on the preponderance of the findings, we suggest that timing is managed by different mechanisms and/or strategies on time-interval production tasks and on short-duration time-based prospective memory tasks.
基于时间的前瞻记忆和时间间隔生产中的时间相关过程
基于时间的前瞻记忆任务需要在指定时间(例如下午3点)或在指定时间(例如3分钟)后检索先前形成的计划(例如,打电话给我的移动电话)。在本研究中,我们调查了在短时间基于时间的前瞻记忆任务和时间间隔产生任务中是否会招募相同的时间相关过程。在双任务范式中,我们要求年轻的成年参与者在同时从事基于时间的前瞻性记忆任务和时间间隔生产任务时做出类别归属决策。在一组条件下,参与者被要求将注意力平均分配给两个任务,而在另一组条件下,他们主要将注意力分配给与时间相关的任务。结果表明,时间估计不受注意分配操作的影响,但注意分配操作会影响并发类别隶属性决策任务的表现,并且预期时间估计在前瞻记忆任务上比在时间产生任务上更准确。基于这些研究结果的优势,我们建议在时间间隔生产任务和短时间基于时间的前瞻记忆任务中,时间是由不同的机制和/或策略来管理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信