Power, Emotion, and Privilege: “Discomfort” as Resistance to Transgender Student Affirmation

Abstract

Context: This research contributes to a growing body of scholarship on affirming and accommodating transgender and gender-diverse students in elementary school spaces by exploring how institutional resistance to gender-inclusive practices manifested in a single rural school district. Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study: The study was shaped by the following questions: (1) How is “successful” support of a transgender child defined by the educators who worked with a child as her gender identity and expression changed? (2) What were the educators’ strategies for facilitating the student’s in-school transition? (3) What (if any) actions were taken to recognize or affirm gender diversity? This article focuses on one educator advocate’s experiences navigating a district administrator’s expressions of discomfort with transgender inclusion, which he deployed in situations in which he believed proposals for gender-inclusive policies and practices were “running wild” and too far from the institutional status quo. Participants: Interview participants were school personnel, including administrators, teachers, and counselors, who worked in the school while the child was in kindergarten through third grade, and the student’s mother. Research Design: Eleven interviews were conducted. Limited observation included a school assembly focused on learning to accept differences and observation of gendered images throughout the school building. A semi-structured interview protocol was used that included questions about (1) first learning of the presence of a transgender child; (2) the process for learning about transgender identity; (3) implementing procedures for including and accommodating the transgender student; (4) integrating gender differences into the curriculum; (5) discussing gender differences with students; and (6) perceptions of the school district’s success in working with the transgender student and her family. Interview questions were designed to encourage descriptive accounts in which participants describe what happened, their interpretation of the events, and their understanding of their own positions within the events. Conclusions: This study addresses how discomfort serves as a socially acceptable narrative for school personnel to prioritize the (actual or perceived) feelings of cisgender adults and children over the needs of transgender students.